• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the assertion that the concentration of economic power in the public sector undermines the foundations of economic growth.

Extracts from this document...


Economics 'S' Paper Assignment Discuss the assertion that the concentration of economic power in the public sector undermines the foundations of economic growth. In this essay, the concentration of economic growth in the public sector will be taken to mean the proportion of the economy that is governed by public ownership in the production of goods and services. Foundations of economic growth refer to the potential for the economy to expand, and hence this would be represented by an outward shift of the Production Possibility Curve. Therefore we shall discuss how a higher proportion of the economy that the government is directly involved in leads to a diminishing potential for future progress of the economy. How can the public sector hinder economic growth? Economic growth is determined by the potential of the country to produce additional outputs of goods and services. This is in turn dependent on two factors- availability of resources and productivity. Therefore if the public sector influences these two factors negatively, then it would undermine the foundations of economic growth The government can affect the capital aspect of resources. Assuming ceteris paribus (other factors like land, natural resources- oil, timber, etc are also rigid), it is commonly recognized that heavy involvement of the public sector could hinder capital generation. This is since with majority of the workforce employed by the public sector, there are few entrepreneurs and the extent of free enterprise is limited. ...read more.


Hence numerous state funded factories came into operation under the supervision of the Jurong Town Council. Ship building industry was also developed and Jurong island was a site for agglomeration of similar factories. This government initiated move proved that coordination was efficient and the factories enjoyed economies of scale, sharing and quick assimilation of knowledge, lower transport costs, shared infrastructure, etc that promoted economic growth. Engaging in manufacturing also tapped on the latent potential of labour at that time. Unemployment dropped drastically and per capita incomes rose due to the employment of cheap labour in the public sector, and these were indicators of strong economic growth. With the revenue generated from manufacturing, state control of funds allowed the government to best use the funds to expand economic growth. Infrastructure was rapidly developed and improved and the foundations for economic growth were built up. The public sector was responsible for the managing of key infrastructure and services and this included previously known as city council - PUB (power and water), SingTel (telecommunications), SIA (airlines), Temasek Holdings (trading), NOL (shipping), DBS (banking). These facilities further consolidated Singapore's entrepot status, as well as persuaded many foreign investors to invest in Singapore, being the most developed nation in the region whilst enjoying cheap labour at that time. The installation of this key infrastructure by the public was the crux for Singapore's strong economic growth in the 1980s. The public sector had immense economic power during that early period of Singapore's development and contrary to the stated assertion, did not undermine the foundations of economic growth but instead, promoted rapid economic growth. ...read more.


Without such basic infrastructure, investors are reluctant to invest in the country. Secondly, the public sector is responsible for undertaking the task of goods and services with high start up costs. This includes telecommunications and subway system, which led to the rise of SingTel and MRT. Other new services include cable television and this is undertaken by Starhub. With such high costs involved, the public sector steps in with government funding to provide these value-added facilities that indirectly promote economic growth. Note that once these firms have been established, the role of the public sector has diminished, with MRT being privatized with the merging of SBS and MRT to SMRT and the deregulation of the telecommunications industry with the introduction of M1 and Starhub. Furthermore, the public sector is responsible of promoting economic growth by providing merit goods. Such goods are socially desirable but often under produced because their worth is under valued. This includes education for youths, Research and Development for firms and industries, as well as retraining for existing workforce. All these services provided by the public sector are crucial to the sustained economic growth of Singapore. Therefore in conclusion, a temporal scale must be considered with this assertion. In the early stages of development, the concentration of economic power in the public sector actually promotes economic growth. But in the later stages of development, the assertion is true that the concentration of economic power in the public sector undermines the foundations of economic growth, though it must be stressed an appropriate size of public sector must exist to ensure economic growth. ~End~ Done by: Shawn Quek 2AHR ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. The Role of the Informal Sector in the National Economy.

    But to what extent is the question asked by many. It is clear that there is a lot of controversy associated with the rising of the informal sector. As Hansenne in Dhemba (1999) succinctly points out; "there are many different point of views from which one can observe the informal sector.

  2. China and Economic growth, Case Study

    Despite rising employment, the average rate of growth was close to 8% per annum. This is due to the Chinese economy 'pump priming' its economy. Globalisation has boosted growth, resulting in more production and therefore more jobs. However, due to the Global Financial Crisis, some sectors suffered major structural unemployment causing the figures to rise.

  1. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    after the US. FDI in China in 2002 amounted to USD52.7 billion, a 20% increase from 2001. Up to September 2002, 41% of FDI was attributed to investments from Hong Kong and Taiwan, while investments from the US, Japan and Korea amounted to 22%.

  2. Discuss the view that the free market economy encourages negative externalities and thus the ...

    Furthermore, if firms are taxed for polluting, the tax acts as an incentive for firms to find cleaner and greener methods of production. On the other hand, different firms have different levels of production and thus will causes varying degrees and different negative externalities.

  1. Case Study: The Home Depot

    It handles with the weight of the items. Also the total must be 1, meaning that some of the items will have to be adjusted. The third (rating) column is the same as for the EFAS and IFAS. Most of the ratings will be the same as in the EFAS and IFAS, although this is not always the case.

  2. Why is economic growth desirable?

    education system. Another aspect of economic growth is that the government will have much more money to spend because there will be more firms paying higher taxes and more spending would mean more taxes from goods.

  1. The Desirability of Economic Growth.

    This is usually seen as a sign of growing affluence. However, as car usage rates have increased, air pollution has worsened, global warming worsened and dramatic climatic change stimulated. For example more airborne pollution is blamed for increasing asthma rates.

  2. Contrasting Economic Value Systems in Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard

    It is as if they live in two different worlds and belong to two different paradigms of economic thinking; they talk past one another and never truly converse. Lopakhin sees the practicality of the business plan, which would secure the Ranevskys a good and stable source of income, and at the same time, sustained ownership of the property.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work