• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do We Need Government Intervention To Ensure An Efficient Allocation of Resources?

Extracts from this document...


Do We Need Government Intervention To Ensure An Efficient Allocation of Resources? The Government as according to this article, is not the solution to a problem, it is the problem. While a government's intervention may seem helpful during the start, it does however distort the workings of the market system, hence leading to an inefficient allocation of resources. Policy proposals such as privatisation and compulsory competitive tendering are all examples of the application which has been described as the orthodox economic belief. The notion of economic or allocative efficiency is in way, the economic Holy Grail. As the basic problem of economics is scarcity, the allocation of resources most efficiently is the aim of an economist. The market system, in the majority of situations is the most effective mechanism to achieve allocative efficiency which can be shown from the earliest of times when flint axes would have been traded for fish. Trade would continue until both communities have gained the combination of goods which they want. ...read more.


Governments also exist to fill the gaps where markets do not, or can not exist, such as defence where the goods are non-rival and non-excludable and a free market would not be able to provide such public goods to a socially acceptable level. In many cases factor mobility has the problems of occupational immobility where skills can't be transferred and geographical immobility where jobs can't be transferred, government can intervene here by doing things like training. A final source of market failure shows that without government intervention, widespread and extreme inequalities are likely to emerge. A final conclusion states that for both, an efficient economy and a society in which we want to live require some government intervention. Why Would Public Goods Not Be Accurately Provided By A Free Market? Public goods which are provided by the government are actually not goods, but services and these services are amongst those which are non-rival, non- excludable and non-rejectable. ...read more.


There are the grey areas in the public goods. A perfect example of this would be knowledge. Is knowledge a public good? By one person knowing something that doesn't stop anybody else from knowing the same thing. As long as the knowledge is part of the public domain, no one can be stopped from leaning it. But not all knowledge is known. There are government cover-ups to all sorts of things causing an exclusion of knowledge. In conclusion, we see that although the economist's definition of a public good seems simple and precise, there are a few problems. The free-riders problem for one which explains that many socially desirable goods and services would be under provided in the private sector, as well as this there are many goods which only fit the definition of a public good, partially, and yet are treated as a public good. There is a simple answer to the question of can public goods be provided adequately in the free market, and the free-rider problem means that the free market would not be able to provide public goods. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. The mixed market economy and the allocation of resources.

    But the command economy idea is not completely useless, because it is more objective, since with this allocation of resources (theoretically)

  2. Outline the reasons why the process of industrialization in developing countries might require government ...

    As an example of the effect of investment on economic growth we can look at Botswana. Before independence Botswana suffered from an appalling lack of investment in anything, except perhaps diamond mining. (Botswana is called 'the gem of Africa') yet since its independence in the 60's it has invested wisely

  1. The efficient market (socially desirable) equilibrium levels of price and output. What action might ...

    But consumption of tobacco can harm individuals around the smoker due to second hand smoking event, yielding in a negative externality. An externality is the impact of one person's actions on the wellbeing of a bystander and an adverse impact causes a negative externality (Gans, et al. 2003, p. 198).

  2. How do different economic systems ration scarce resources? To what extent it is ...

    The production of more and more clothing will involve growing marginal cost: ever increasing amounts of food have to be sacrificed for each additional unit of clothing produced. So governments would analyse and determine what is the best to produce to satisfy the habitants.

  1. The Quest for Optimal Asset Allocation Strategies in Integrating Europe.

    Until a few years ago, it was common practice among portfolio managers to follow a top-down approach to asset selection. The first step of the top-down approach involved deciding on a country allocation grid, effectively placing first priority on an adequate geographical diversification of portfolios.

  2. Every business experiences external influences which they need to manage properly.

    Quality is also one of the main factors that Tesco competes with. To attract more customers and to try and keep its existing customers Tesco tries to provide good looking and good quality packaging with its own brand products. It sells products with famous logos and brand names.

  1. Analysis of some fundamental arguments claimed by Albert Hirschman and Gunnar Myrdal

    He disagreed with Hirschman however on the fundamental point of whether the trickle down outweighed the polarisation effects. Hirschman described Myrdal's ideas as being overly-dismal but Myrdal based his conclusions on the principle of circular and cumulative causation, a type of vicious circle which saw the more advanced regions become more advanced while the peripheral regions fell further behind.

  2. Liberalization: where it has lead us and where it is headed

    world-the other three being Mesopotamia, China and Egypt-where there was what we consider civilization, complete with plumbing superior to that of many Indian villages today, sophisticated mathematical knowledge, and active trade relations with the other centers. For centuries beginning roughly 600 B.C., India was the mother lode of philosophical and mathematical thought for many other peoples.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work