• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Drug Testing in the Workplace

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Drug Testing in the Workplace Throughout her experiences as a low-wage earner in the book Nickel and Dimed, Barbara Ehrenreich attempts to provide a social commentary on the many hardships faced as a result of being underemployed. Among these she includes problems she confronted in regards to the availability and costs of housing, food, and clothing, as well as the unavailability of jobs that pay enough to provide for all of her living expenses. She attempts to place herself in the position of someone who can hardly make ends meet in order to get a real feel for what it's like to be broke. One problem she runs into during the course of her observation, and the subsequent overcoming of this obstacle, does not fit into an accurate application of her experiment. Before being hired, Ehrenreich must submit to a drug test. She knows that she will test positive, and decides to purchase a detoxification product that will clean out her system. This alternative to failing the drug test would not be viable if Ehrenreich were actually living as if she was poor. Whatever the case may be, the drug testing that Ehrenreich submitted to has become exceedingly popular in the private sector, and has slowly started to infiltrate the public business realm as well. Drug testing is not a new development, but its intrusion in the workplace has become much greater since the years that testing was first implemented in the private workplace during the Reagan Administration. ...read more.

Middle

The Due Process clause in the Fourth Amendment protects against this type of discrimination (DeCrese, et al., 16). A pre-employment drug screening defies due process by not allowing the potential employee to challenge the test. The job seeker is not considered for employment without even knowing that it was the result of a positive drug test. In a case where an applicant failed a drug test based on something he was prescribed, the candidate would have no opportunity to explain himself because he would not be considered for the job solely based on his testing positive for drugs (DeCrese, et al., 17). Because of these constitutional discrepancies related to drug screening, the court systems have been packed with cases relating to the legality of testing. It is unclear whether opponents of drug testing will ever gain an advantage over those who support tests due to the vague application of the Constitution to cases involving the privacy of individuals submitting to tests. Corporate supporters of workplace drug testing often substantiate their support based on any liability that may happen if measures weren't taken to ensure the sobriety of their employees. The companies feel that since they can be held accountable for actions of an employee, even if that employee is under the influence of drugs, they should have the opportunity to prevent this from happening by way of drug tests (Gilliom, 36). ...read more.

Conclusion

But based on this research, it is easy to see that the idea of drug testing has become more and more mainstream, and whether or not a company actually decides to use it, it will remain an option. Barbara Ehrenreich sees drug testing as a minor obstacle in becoming employed, and argues that it shouldn't be used, but she does not make her claim on the ethics behind the test. Her disapproval comes from a questioning of the notion that drug use decreases total productivity among workers citing an ACLU report that supports this idea. Had she argued against drug screening on the basis of the illegality of the issue and fought to protect her unalienable rights given to her by the Constitution, she may have been able to persuade the reader into believing that drug tests shouldn't be used. Instead, her presumptuous attitude toward the tests makes it seem as though she only feels it is a nuisance that makes her spend $30 that she shouldn't have to. But then again, if she really were to put herself in a position close to the poverty line she would not have the luxury of spending that money in the first place. She would have to either quit doing drugs, or find a job that wouldn't make her prove she wasn't doing them. Politics Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE People in Business section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE People in Business essays

  1. Report: Type of ownership of J-Sainsbury

    The management style, culture and structure of J-Sainsbury's will have a significant impact on its performance. The values, attitudes and beliefs of the business flow down from the top of the business and affect everyone who works for J-Sainsbury's and who comes into contact with J-Sainsbury's.

  2. As a short-term business Consultant, I have been hired by Alton Towers PLC to ...

    Each of them are now explained below: > Autocratic, This style matches role culture. It exists when a business has functional areas. Each of the employees is told what to do and the manager is the only person who has a say with the decisions made.

  1. Stress in the Work-Place

    While it may seem like yet another expense tugging at your straining purse strings, consider the words of a prominent member of our business community - "the cost of doing nothing is far greater... If you haven't got an EAP, look into it.

  2. Diversity in the Workplace

    The plural organisation is more inclusive of the minorities, although their representatives are still predominantly in non-managerial roles. The driving force behind the integration, is a strategy of affirmative action, an approach that ultimately leads to great inter-group conflict. While discrimination and prejudice are reduced in the plural organisation, minority groups are still expected to assimilate into the majority culture.

  1. Stress In the Workplace

    The situation here shows that cholesterol in the blood rises gradually with constant exposure to stress. There is also strong evidence for the causal relationship between stress and infectious disease. Woolfolk was able to show that employees that are very fatigue (a symptom of stress) were more susceptible to infections.

  2. Diversity and Ethics in the Workplace

    A HRM needs to remain neutral at all times, setting aside their own believes and opinions. When hiring new staff a HRM cannot treat one applicant differently than another based on race or gender.

  1. Ark Housing

    The choice of work is unbalanced. * Social Services take a back seat when people come in. * Not all the residents go to adult training centres 1.7 Suggestions for Potential Solutions Caring for a resident with a learning disability is a lifelong commitment, which continues even when the person is living away from the family home.

  2. Diversity in the Corporate Workplace

    Workplace diversity is a multi-faceted concept that continues to evolve as more industries move toward a global marketplace. Most people believe that every human being is of equal worth, and that he or she is entitled to the same privileges and opportunities, without regard to race, gender, disability, or age.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work