• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

Enron Case Analysis

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Enron Case Analysis Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 3 2.0 Company History 4 3.0 Organizational Mission 4 4.0 Market Conditions 5 5.0 Accounting Practices 6 5.1 Bonus Program 6 5.2 Mark to Market System 6 6.0 Culture 7 6.1 Financial 7 6.2 Supervision 8 7.0 Affects on the Local Community 8 7.1 Worldwide Effects: 8 7.2 Effects in the Industry 9 8.0 Underlying Issues 10 9.0 What went Wrong 11 9.1 Recommendations 11 10.0 Works Cited 13 Executive Summary This case analysis will talk about the local, state, national, and global effects of Enron's corporate decisions that led to the company's bankruptcy in 2001. The case will give an in depth discussion about Enron and their business practices. It will also explain the social environment the company faced and what caused the decisions that led to Enron's demise. The case will first give a background of Enron and the electricity industry, then go on to explain how they got into the situation they faced. The case will then describe the corporate culture of the company as well as the major cohorts involved in decision making. Some of these cohorts include the top executives, shareholders, and board members. The case will then discuss Enron's accounting practices and their financial statements. It will explain why Enron made certain decisions and who benefited from making these decisions. Then the paper will discuss the underlying issues involved in the Enron scandal. Finally, the paper is wrapped up by personal reflections and recommendations for the company and others involved. ...read more.

Middle

Instead of using actual numbers, most of their numbers they used were estimates of future cash flows. Since they also rewarded bonuses according to these numbers, the numbers tended to be inflated. This is the reason Enron reported gains from 1997 to 2000 when it was later reported that they actually lost 600 million during this period. [7] The culture of the company for the most part supported these accounting practices, but when there was a conflict or someone spoke up, that person was removed from their position. [6] This left little opposition to their faulty business practices. 6.0 Culture Enron over the years created a very distinct culture that actually rewarded unethical behavior. Instead of hiring managers for their management skills, they hired aggressive young candidates right out of college, so they could instill their values upon them. [6] Most of these people knew little about management, but were smart, bold, and aggressive. These were the type of managers Enron wanted to create deals and expand the company at all costs. 6.1 Financial Much of the company's finances were done by Arthur Anderson accounting firm. [2] This meant that the corruption ran deep within the company. For every new deal being made was supposed to be reviewed by the legal department of the manager, the corporate legal department, the chief risk officer and chief accounting officer (Arthur Anderson). [6] But in practice many of these people were often skipped. When Carl Bass of Arthur Anderson spoke out about an unethical business deal being made in 1997, he was quickly demoted and taken off that project. ...read more.

Conclusion

9.1 Recommendations Even though Enron went bankrupt the company is still around. They have been forced to sell off many of their assets, including their corporate office in Houston, but they company itself is not completely erased. [7] Enron should continue to liquidate all assets that do not pertain to their core business, the natural gas industry. They have to in essence start over again as a small gas company. This will allow them to slowly regain their customer base and eventually build back their once proud name. By expanding so quickly in so many areas Enron lost focus on their core business of supplying customers with natural gas. They must regain this focus by producing and distributing low cost natural gas. Also, Enron must make sure that all corrupt company officials are terminated and basically start with a new top management team. This team must be built with not only strong ideas, but also strong ethical beliefs. For Enron to continue on they must do absolutely everything by the numbers, because their books are going to be continuously reviewed for the next five to ten years and they will not be able to withstand any further mistakes. Enron will never regain the prominence it had in the late 1990's, however with hard work and a lot of luck, Enron may land back on their feet within a few years. Enron must make ethical decisions and make socially responsible actions, for all eyes are on Enron to see if they can survive. If they can gratify their creditors and regain their business they can eventually begin to grow again. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Accounting & Finance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Accounting & Finance essays

  1. Hampton Machine Tools Company Case

    Disbusements 1544 1370.25 1020.25 2551.25 Net Cash flow -860 302.75 -241.25 -947.25 Beginning Cash 1559 699 1001.75 760.5 Ending Cash 699 1001.75 760.5 -186.75 Required financing 0 0 0 186.75 Exhibit B.3. Cash budget with payment on principal made on installment and dividend payment moved to next year September October

  2. Comsat case

    This is due to greater degrees of risk for different types of investments. Comparable Companies When a company has not used debt financing to determine a cost of debt, instead of using the risk-free rate as a substitute, a firm can look to comparable companies as a possible alternative.

  1. Compare and contrast the approach of the US and UK financial regulatory bodies and ...

    If the SEC allow foreign companies to adopt the IASs which are different from those U.S. companies adopted, SEC would immediately come under pressure, to allow U.S. companies have the same right. Otherwise, as ZEFF (1998) claims that US companies may go "offshore," i.e., relocate headquarters in elsewhere outside

  2. Free essay

    planning personal finances

    When you earn money you are given an amount which is tax free. If you want to calculate how much of the money you earn goes towards the Inland Revenue you have t follow certain steps. This will be shown below.

  1. Financial Analysis of Matalan PLC

    M&S: 2716.7 / 7693.4 = 40%. Marks and Spencers have a lower debt ratio than Matalan. Matalan have to be careful as creditors prefer lower debt ratios which imply greater protection against losses if bankruptcy occurs. Profitability Ratios: Return on Capital Employed.

  2. This report has been produced as evidence for Unit 9 - 'Financial Services' - ...

    you can take up too 25% as a tax free lump sum). An annuity is basically an insurance policy for the rest of your life - it will pay out for however long you go on to live. An annuity is the way in which you convert the money you

  1. Unit 5 Introduction to Accounting

    should need to bring some money to increase the amount of capital available. Shares A unit of ownership interest in a corporation or financial asset. While owning shares in a business does not mean that the shareholder has direct control over the business's day-to-day operations, being a shareholder does entitle

  2. Exploring business purposes

    (I got this data from the B-TECH book). Year Primary (%) Secondary (%) Tertiary (%) 1993 4.1 28.9 67.0 1998 4.0 28.7 67.3 2000 3.5 26.5 70 2003 3.1 22.5 74.4 2005 3 22 75 * Approximation share in Britain output by sector.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work