Environmental Analysis Of Landis Lund.

Authors Avatar

Organisations, Competition & Environment                Assignment 2 – Environmental Analysis

M.Crangle

Environmental

Analysis

Of

Landis Lund

By Martin Crangle


Table of Contents

Introduction

1        Stakeholder Analysis

1.1 Who are stakeholders?

1.1.1 Primary stakeholders

1.1.2 Secondary stakeholders

1.2 What is a stakeholder analysis?

1.3 Chosen stakeholders

1.3.1 Stakeholder analysis of suppliers

1.3.2 Stakeholder analysis of employees

1.3.3 Stakeholder analysis of agents

2        Economic Systems

2.1 Types of Economic Systems

2.1.1 Capitalism

2.1.2 Socialism

2.1.3 Mixed economy

3        Market Structures

3.1 Types of markets

3.1.1 Monopolies

3.1.2 Duopoly

3.1.3 Oligopolies

3.1.4 Perfect competition

3.2 Market characteristics

3.2.1 Entry barriers

3.2.2 Exit barriers

3.2.3 Number and types of sellers

3.2.4 Product differentiation

3.2.5 Numbers and types of buyers

3.3 Landis Lund market environment and characteristics

4        Market Forces

4.1 What are market forces?

4.2 Impact on Landis Lund

4.3 Response to market forces

4.3.1 Establish a presence in China

4.3.2 Sell to Tier 2 suppliers

4.3.3 Conform to EU legislation

  1. Competitive advantage

5.1 Competitive advantage

5.2 Competitive disadvantages

5.2.1 Exchange rates

5.2.2 Technology

5.3 Product differentiation

5.4 Steps to gain competitive advantage

5.4.1 Technological advantage

5.4.2 Proven quality advantage

5.4.3 Cost reductions

6        Roles of the State

6.1 Government policy 1

6.1.1 Sustainable growth

6.1.2 Low inflation

6.1.3 Falling unemployment or full employment

6.1.4 Balance of payment equilibrium

6.2 Government policy 2

6.2.1 Fiscal policy

6.2.2 Monetary policy

6.2.3 Industrial Policy

6.2.4 Social Policy

6.3 Types of governments and their economic influence.

6.4 How does the State influence Landis Lund

7         Assignment Task 2 Presentation and Handouts

8        Bibliography


Introduction

This report is designed to give a comprehensive environmental analysis of my current employees Landis Lund.

It will outline:

  • Stakeholder objectives
  • The economic system in which it operates
  • The market structures in which it operates
  • Response to market forces
  • Competitive advantage
  • Implications from the State

Landis Lund design and manufacture high precision grinding machines for the automotive industry. An American company UNOVA INC owns us. We also have a sister company in the US who distribute solely to the North American Market, leaving Landis Lund to sell to the rest of the world.


Chapter 1

Stakeholder Analysis

1.1 Who are stakeholders?

A stakeholder is any person, group or institution that has an interest in a company.

Stakeholders can be divided into two groups:

1.1.1 Primary stakeholders

Those who are ultimately affected, i.e. who expect to benefit from or be adversely affected by the intervention.

1.1.2 Secondary stakeholders

Those with some intermediary role: Banks, local government, export promotion agencies, business service providers.

Stakeholders can be any of the following:

Customers – Reasonable quality goods at a reasonable price

Employees – Fair pay, fair working conditions

Environment – The companies processes should be as environmentally friendly as possible

Management – Do what’s in the interest of the business, not for a personal gain or the advantage of one particular stakeholder

Shareholders – Want a good return on investment, can be a quick gain or a more strategic long term gain

State – Provides laws and regulations that businesses must adhere to and will receive funding in the form of taxes.

Suppliers – Provide services and products in return for payment

Depending on the type of business the above will either be primary or secondary stakeholders


1.2 What is a stakeholder analysis?

A Stakeholder analysis aims to:

  • Identify and define the characteristics and objectives of key stakeholders;

  • Assess the manner in which they might affect or be affected by the project outcome;

  • Understand the relations between stakeholders, including an assessment of the real or potential conflicts of interest and expectation between stakeholders;

  • Assess the capacity of different stakeholders to participate.

1.3 Chosen Stakeholders

The three stakeholders I have chosen for my analysis are:

  • Suppliers
  • Employees
  • Agents

1.3.1 Stakeholder analysis of suppliers

The basic stakeholder objectives of any supplier are to be paid for providing a product or service, but the objectives are usually more complex than this.

Our suppliers can be categorised into suppliers that serve the business needs (paper, stationary, car hire), and those that serve the product (grinding wheels, gauges, sensors).

The suppliers we use for the business don’t really get changed that often as we generally use standard products. Unless the supplier introduces an unjustified price increase, we will remain with that supplier.

With the advent of the Internet I feel we could reduce costs if consumables within Landis Lund. As well as there being many price comparison websites, that allow you to choose, there are also sites that are basically mail order via the web, they don’t incur high labour costs as they don’t have any high street shops to finance. This approach has been mentioned to senior management but they feel, at this moment in time, the administrative costs to Landis Lund to setup an new supplier account, set up payment terms etc, do not justify the time spent searching for a cheaper alternative than what we already use.

The objectives then of our business suppliers are to receive regular business from Landis Lund as we stay in business, the amount of revenue they will generate is not really dependant on busy we are, just as long as we are in business…

The business objectives of the product based suppliers differ in the fact that the more machines we produce, the more business they will receive from us.

Their objectives are to produce reliable goods for Landis Lund so we will continue to use their product. We have very few reliability problems with suppliers as they are also providing complex equipment, so the investment and research into these products is of a very high standard.

Our product dependant suppliers are either chosen by our engineers or chosen by our customers. As machines are always variations on a theme, the knowledge of supplier’s components is high so our engineers can design assemblies using products they know. Headaches can occur when a new supplier insists we use their preferred supplier that we have never used before. The functions of the components this new supplier provides will usually be the same, but if they are cosmetically different then some reengineering has to be done.

Landis Lund has in the region of six hundred and fifty, but only around fifty are vital to the company.

These fifty are responsible for supplying the key equipment for our machines, equipment that has had huge investments in the form of R&D. Over the years we have built up excellent partnerships with our main suppliers and we both benefit from them prototyping their products on our machines.

The prototyping allows the suppliers to recreate real life scenarios, in which to evaluate their products. These suppliers are market leaders in their industries, allowing Landis Lund to capitalise on being the first users of such products and maintain our technological advantage.

Unfortunately the budget for R&D has been slashed in order to reduce costs, while we are still out in front in terms of technical superiority we are losing orders to low bid.

The reduction in our R&D budget has meant that the prototyping has to be done on “live” projects, resulting in some embarrassing longevity problems once the machines are out in the field.

While the majority of these live tests are serving us well, it may only be a matter of time until they cause a serious headache for the customer and ultimately a loss of future orders.

The supplier payment process has recently been changed as well. What was happening was that the Financial Director was only allowing a fixed amount per month to be allocated to supplier invoices. The purchase clerk always sorted invoices into supplier name order, and worked through the invoices until the allocated amount had been reached resulting in suppliers starting A, B, C etc getting paid every month. This process continued until we got put on stop from some major suppliers with company names lower down the alphabet.

While some suppliers are chosen for us through customer specifications, our continued collaboration with our preferred suppliers is vital for Landis Lund’s survival.

1.3.2 Stakeholder analysis of employees

While our partnership with major suppliers is vital to our technological leadership, it’s the employees within Landis Lund that enable this synergy to be created.

The objectives of Landis Lund employees is the same of a supplier; they expect to be paid for the service they provide to the company.

Again, this needs to be expanded. Different employees have different objectives:

Some employees want to do as little as possible, go through the day doing only what is asked of them, and at the end of the week collect their wage. Others feel like they have more to offer and a better work ethic, they seek ways in which to improve the company, they understand that if they can be more efficient and productive, the company will become more efficient and productive, while very few see Landis Lund as a stepping stone to greater things, using Landis Lund to gain experience and knowledge that they will use elsewhere.

Every single manager apart form the Finance Director has completed a Landis Lund apprenticeship. This allows the continued evolution of grinding machine know-how to be passed down.

The technical knowledge of our engineers has resulted in many machine tool related patents being accredited to Landis Lund.

The excellent working conditions and wages that Landis Lund provides results in a very low rate of staff turnover. The highest rate of staff turnover is during the apprenticeship when you know one way or the other if a life of engineering is for you.

Landis Lund is always quick to implement any new legislation regarding employee welfare, this maybe to do with being influenced by our US parent company, where the blame culture there can result in employees suing their employers for failure to provide the latest safety equipment. Landis Lund provides free eye tests for VDU operators, free safety glasses, free protective clothing and footwear depending on risk.

While the current crop of managers and engineers will stand Landis Lund in good stead for at least a generation, the recruitment of apprentices whose passion is engineering is slowly declining. Indeed we have lost several key apprentices lately who wanted to pursue a university degree as well as still working at Landis Lund. But in their wisdom senior management failed to see the value add that this extra knowledge can provide and made them choose, hardly surprising that they opted for university.

Apprentices are usually split into craft and technicians, craft apprentices are trained up to work in the machine shop, while technicians are trained up to work as service engineers or in the drawing office. If the UK manufacturing industry keeps reducing the way it is, both types of apprentice could become scarce. The craft through outsourcing to low labour countries and the technicians could not be as high calibre as is required.

Join now!

Landis Lund employees objectives are fulfilled across the workforce, for those that are here just to get paid, providing they complete what is asked of them, they are OK. If you want to better yourself and the company, training is available where appropriate (workers in the machine shop do not get funding for IT courses and accounts staff don't get trained on the fork lift truck).

1.3.3 Stakeholder analysis of Overseas Sales agents

Agents play a pivotal role in the customer relations process. They are mainly used in countries where English is not the primary language. We have ...

This is a preview of the whole essay