• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Inequality in the UK.

Extracts from this document...


Inequality in the UK The Oxford English Dictionary defines inequality as "the quality of being unequal or uneven". The instance of being unequal may arise from the disparity of distribution or opportunity and spans all social dogmas including: gender, race, political or religious persuasion. There are many forms of measuring inequality wealth, consumption and opportunity but there are problems inherent in each. Perhaps the most effective way of measuring inequality is comparing income earned, as there is sufficient raw data, it is easily conceptualised and it does not entail normative statements or value judgements. The most widely used measure of income inequality in society is the Gini co-efficient. It is a precise way of measuring the position of the Lorenz curve (see diagram below), a graph that shows, for the bottom x% of households, the percentage y% of the total income which they have. To compute the Gini Coefficient, the area between the Lorenz Curve and the 45 degree equality line is measured. This area is divided by the entire area below the 45 degree line (which is always exactly a 1/2). The quotient is the Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality, expressed as a percentage or as the numerical equivalent of that percentage, which is always between 0 and 1. The higher the figure for the Gini co-efficient, the greater is the degree between high and lower income households. ...read more.


Therefore, households partly or wholly dependent on welfare assistance see their relative incomes fall over time. Those who are unemployed must rely on these state handouts and subsequently they fall further behind those employed in terms of income levels. Twice since 1980, mass unemployment has affected Britain resulting in a large rise in relative poverty. To compound this income tax rates have fallen, specifically those targeting high income earners; during the 1980's the top rate of tax was cut from 80% to 40%. These tax reductions have worsened relative poverty as people in work are able to keep a higher proportion of what they earned. Ultimately cuts in any form of direct taxation will tend to disproportionately favour the better off. Other factors that affect inequality in society include the composition of the household. Although an individual may be a high income earner, supporting a large family will mean the income per person in the household is relatively low. Conversely a household where all members of the family are earning a wage despite the fact it is low may have a high household income. Subsequently inequalities differ depending on whether they are being measured per individual or per household. Generally it is accepted by the government that income inequality constitutes market failure as the market mechanism produces an allocation of resources which is sub optimal. ...read more.


Essentially free market economists claim that redistribution policies employed by the government will lead to increased unemployment which will inevitably lead to lower economic growth. They argue that income inequality cannot be improved without producing significant negative effects on the National economy and therefore reason it is impractical to narrow the gap between poor and rich. Instead they argue that income differentials should be widened through low taxation, minimal government legislation in the private sector and the bare minimum of state provision, in order to improve the welfare of those less fortunate in society i.e. to improve poverty. Although the poor may lose out in state benefits they will be more than compensated through increased growth which in theory should 'trickle down' from the better off in society to the less fortunate. Although inequality rises it can be argued that being better off is a matter of absolute quantities rather than relative quantities. Through this theoretical mechanism a system is created where wealth in society will benefit not just the rich but also the poor, particularly those who are unable to work. As it can be seen from free market theory inequality is not necessarily a bad thing, but rather it acknowledges that poverty, a symptom of inequality must be addressed. However it must be questioned whether the use of increased economic growth to tackle poverty is sustainable or indeed viable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    Similarly, the underlying advisory support in the form of online chat facility and dedicated email facility for existing and prospective investors has created an investor friendly image. A FICCI Study on, " Impediments to Investment" (January 2002) has acknowledged that the Central level FIPB clearances have been successfully streamlined.

  2. Is the Welfare State Desirable?

    However, he does not have the vicious inside him for him to fulfil this ambition "I fear thy nature is too full o' th' milk of human nature". It is evident that Lady Macbeth has a clear idea of what Macbeth is and is not able to do; making it

  1. Living Wage

    $21 in Switzerland, $15 in Japan and $14 in Germany to about � 30-35 in Pakistan, Madagascar, Kenya, Indonesia and China, a range of 70 to 1 mirroring the 80 to 1 spread of gross national product per capita4. How can labor and businesses in the industrial countries withstand competition from low-labor cost producers?

  2. Liberalization: where it has lead us and where it is headed

    Unfortunately, the Indian government won't get out of the way, at least not to the extent it should, because that's not the nature of bureaucracy. A cartoon by Laxman, everyone's favorite Indian newspaper cartoonist, shows a Babu sitting in his office in North Block with a group of his subordinates reading a newspaper, and saying: "Cut red tape??

  1. Measurement of National Income, Strengths and Weaknesses of National Income Statistics.

    For example, in the case of a German-owned car factory operating in the US, the profits from the factory would be counted as part of German GNP rather than US GNP because the capital used in production (the factory, machinery, etc.)

  2. Split Votes: A Nation Divided on the Marijuana/Drug Legalization Debate

    The alcohol prohibition of the 1920's is the most similar event to the marijuana prohibition of today. Analyzing that era could show what would happen if marijuana was legalized. There is one notable acceptation: alcohol was popular and legal before it was outlawed, unlike marijuana.

  1. To what extent is income tax in the UK progressive? Discuss the likely effect ...

    Last year 200,000 top earners contributed �15.3 billion in income tax to the Government. People earning �50,000 or more made a total payment of �27.8 billion to the Exchequer. The number of people falling into the top rates of tax has grown over time - in part because of rising national wealth.

  2. Why has income inequality in the UK and US increased so rapidly in recent ...

    will specialise in the production of skill intensive goods, because it has a relative abundance of skilled labour giving it a comparative advantage in this good, and the less developed economy (India) will, for a similar reason, specialise in producing goods that are not skill intensive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work