• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Is it necessary that there is a consensus among citizens if the general will is to prevail?"

Extracts from this document...


"Is it necessary that there is a consensus among citizens if the general will is to prevail?" First a broad definition of consensus which may later be modified. Defined as the "concord of different parts or organs of the body"1 the application to the members of any system seems natural. Defined secondarily as "the collective unanimous opinion of a number of persons"2 we have to consider very carefully about what extent and kinds of consensus we are talking about. A further definitional point this time from Rousseau himself. Rousseau sees an individual under the social contract as playing two roles at once. The individual as a citizen is a member of and indivisible from the sovereign. This can be seen in light of the other role of the individual which is as a member of the state, a subject. "Those who are associated in [the public body] take the name of a people, and call themselves individually citizens, in that they share in the sovereign power, and subjects that they put themselves under the laws of the state" What comprises this 'general will' on which Rousseau bases his quest for the 'Principles of political right'? The general will can be seen as distinct from a sum of coinciding private interests. ...read more.


(Levine Engaging Political Philosophy p87.) The general interest then can exists separate form the wants of any or all members of the body politic. If this is the case then the general will prevails only if it is 'discovered' by a relevantly high majority of the people in any given decision. Levine uses the analogy of a jury in court case. The jurors opinion about what they may want to happen independent of whether he/she is guilty or not, but these must be put aside and the case judged against a yardstick of truth on a matter of fact. A consensus opinion about what is in the general interest in this case may or may not be a correct one and therefore may not be the general interest - theoretically even unanimity is no absolute guarantee of a correct decision. A form of consensus is a necessary not a sufficient condition for the general will to prevail in such circumstances. Rousseau deals with this problem by "promoting a politics that forges the kind of community in which there is a strong consensus on ends, a community in which citizens do discover general interests"(Levine p87) In this community we can return to the idea of the general will as producing a consensus in itself. ...read more.


In our system of representative government it is not the people who are sovereign, but rather parliament. This makes a consensus of the people less important than a consensus of the representatives in parliament and in particular the parties. As well as parliamentary sovereignty we operate an adversarial system. Whether this would allow the kind of consensus necessary for the general will to prevail. The acceptance that the 'loosing side' is wrong is not always feature of our system of democracy. The opposition party are defeated on nearly every issue in the House of ommons. Having said this there is a strong tradition of adherence to the rule of law by both sides of any argument. Consensus is not always the symptom of a prevailing general will the example of the Hobbesian sovereign single actor does not constitute the general will. In Rousseau's society the general will would be represented by a consensus, but in a modern democracy the general will is hard to discern due to the preferential rather than the 'jury' nature of the system described above. If it was to prevail in the long run however the appearance would be one of consensus. Notes : 1. OED 2. OED ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Review of Strong Interest Inventory.

    Based on the pattern of scores, a client may be helped to identify specific types of occupations he/she might explore further, based on the consistency of his/her interests with those of satisfied workers in those jobs.

  2. A Comparative Discussion of Different Approaches to Entrepreneurship.

    Social context also emphasizes an obvious difference from economic one. Reynolds differentiates in his works with four contexts in relation to entrepreneurial opportunity: social network, life course stage, ethnic identification, and population ecology stage (Virtanen, 1997). For the entrepreneur, involvement in causal informal networks may produce a major advantage (Reynolds, 1991, Granovetter, 1973).

  1. Liberalization: where it has lead us and where it is headed

    In the last thirty years, more and more countries have participated and generally have grown economically in rough proportion to the extent they have freed their markets. India has largely failed to participate in this process of building wealth since independence, because of the Swadeshi socialist path its government chose.

  2. Scarcity and Unlimited Wants.

    interest paid on loans; * insurance payments in case of accidents * money put aside to replace work-out machines and vehicles sometime in the future (depreciation). Average Cost Average cost, AC or unit is the cost of producing one item and is calculated by dividing total costs by total output.

  1. Split Votes: A Nation Divided on the Marijuana/Drug Legalization Debate

    This means drug suppliers and users . . . gain at the expense of taxpayers generally, rather than contributing their fair share" (Legalization 2-3). Instead of spending billions of dollars on a policy that has not been effective, the U.S.

  2. The un-utopian issue

    In some ways, this virtually eliminates scarcity for that product since everyone gets the same shares of it. Therefore they can't demand for more. This system was widely used especially in the Second World War countries, at that era, and it proved to be an effective scarcity removal.

  1. It was suggested by Adam Smith in 1776 that individuals led by self interest, ...

    to encourage school leavers to train in the trades it requires for the future. It may also subsidise businesses that it believes may be experiencing a temporary fluctuation in the market. Inflation Many believe that inflation can be looked at as another market failure, particularly wild fluctuations of the level of inflation.

  2. The Quest for Optimal Asset Allocation Strategies in Integrating Europe.

    * Is the recent shift in asset allocation strategy observed in practice justified from an academic perspective? 3. MODERN PORTFOLIO THEORY: Financial economists typically model investment as a problem of constrained optimisation under uncertainty. The expected utility framework shows the theoretical relationship between the elements of this problem: the portfolio

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work