• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain Join the Euro?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

One of the primary arguments against joining is that there are severe structural differences between the members' economies. These may well undermine the success of the project, meaning Britain would do well to stay out. There is no guarantee that the Euro will be successful, and this is a key issue to consider when assessing whether or not Britain should join at this stage. Britain has already had her fingers burnt by the disastrous entry into the doomed European Exchange Rate Mechanism, the previous attempt to fix European currencies against each other which collapsed, plunging Britain into recession. Another key argument against entry is the loss of economic independence that would be seen from Euro membership. If Britain were to join the Euro, our interest rates, currently the tool used for control of inflation by the Bank of England, would be set by the European Central Bank (ECB). Since being given independence the Bank of England has been successful in controlling inflation in this way. Problems could well arise if Britain loses interest rates as a tool for its own economic objectives. ...read more.

Middle

This may hit small to medium sized businesses very hard. However this is very short-termist and I don't feel it is a significant argument against joining. The main argument for membership is that of the benefits that removing exchange rate uncertainty will bring. If there was a common currency within Europe, businesses could be more confident about investment, as they wouldn't need to worry about what effects fluctuating exchange rates would have on them. This should lead to greater investment in the Euro area and flourishing intra-European trade. A single currency also allows freer movement of labour between member states. This, again, should lead to greater investment and trade in the Euro region and greater overall European prosperity. By getting in early Britain can have greater political and economic influence in the creation and inevitable modification of the Euro zone. This would allow that the terms of the system are made as beneficial to her as possible. There is a danger that if Britiain is not actively involved and committed at this early stage, other nations will benefit from having created the terms of the union in their favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe our culture to be strong enough to retain a real identity without the pound. Britain has many strengths, economically and culturally, that should enable her to grow and become more prosperous. But this would undoubtedly be made easier by membership in a successful Euro zone. However, whether or not this is attainable is really the issue - can the differences between the member's economies be overcome? Is convergence possible? Will the Euro be successful? I would tentatively suggest that the answer to these questions is, in the long term, yes. On this basis I suggest that it is best for Britain to join soon. There is a real risk of failure and there will undoubtedly be problems in the short to medium term, but I feel it is worth the risk. In short, I think in principle Britain should join, but only when measures have been taken to ensure convergence and economic stability. I think the idea of tests before entry is a sound one, but unfortunately it seems they have been designed for use as a political tool. I can only hope that Gordon Brown and Tony Blair fully appreciate how much more important this decision is than whether or not Labour are re-elected. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Would It Be Economically Beneficial to Britain to Introduce An Obesity Tax?

    5 star(s)

    But how have these costs and benefits changed over the past century? One theory that has been put forward by two researchers at the University of Chicago (Tomas Philipson and Richard Posner) is that "the cost of expending calories has risen enormously over the course of the 20th century".

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    For example, McDonalds and Metro set up their own supplky chains when they entered India. They have adopted the same international standards for their Indian supply chain as they have elsewhere over the world. Investment in Technology: Technology in Indian Retailing is still at nascent levels.

  1. Analysis of some fundamental arguments claimed by Albert Hirschman and Gunnar Myrdal

    The fact that more capital will be spent in the advanced regions will enhance regional inequalities. As far as trade is concerned, the industrial advantage of the more developed regions will stimulate all trade activities, and hence the industries of weaker regions will be dissatisfied, resulting once more, in the generation of regional inequalities.

  2. Liberalization: where it has lead us and where it is headed

    To take some examples, its philosophical and religious tradition informed the teachings of Buddha. Buddhism, of course, became the most influential philosophic and religious tradition of Asia. The system of numbering we use today came from India, although we call it "Arabic" because it came to Renaissance Italy via the Arabs of North Africa.

  1. "The British Government made a major mistake in not joining the Euro at its ...

    The strategy may also correspond to the preferences of Europe's biggest power namely Germany however this has yet to materialise as the ECB did not cut interest rates at Germany's request. The ECB is also an unelected body so we cannot remove the president if we disapprove of his policies.

  2. Should the UK join the Euro?

    "the first solid indication that British exclusion from the single currency is having a direct and avoidable, economic impact", (Financial Times May 30, 2000). However these figures appear to clash with a report by the governments Invest in Britain Bureau, which claim that record investment levels have been achieved.

  1. UK Membership of the European Monetary Union.

    The shift to euro-dominated securities will reduce the cost of capital for euro firms. As a new world currency, the euro would make securitisation more competitive within its area than for the pound sterling in the UK acting outside and alone.

  2. Entry criteria to the Euro

    economic structures compatible so that we and others could live comfortably with euro interest rates on a permanent basis? * Flexibility - If problems emerge is there sufficient flexibility to deal with them? * Investment - Would joining EMU create better conditions for firms making long-term decisions to invest in Britain?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work