• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain Join the Euro?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

One of the primary arguments against joining is that there are severe structural differences between the members' economies. These may well undermine the success of the project, meaning Britain would do well to stay out. There is no guarantee that the Euro will be successful, and this is a key issue to consider when assessing whether or not Britain should join at this stage. Britain has already had her fingers burnt by the disastrous entry into the doomed European Exchange Rate Mechanism, the previous attempt to fix European currencies against each other which collapsed, plunging Britain into recession. Another key argument against entry is the loss of economic independence that would be seen from Euro membership. If Britain were to join the Euro, our interest rates, currently the tool used for control of inflation by the Bank of England, would be set by the European Central Bank (ECB). Since being given independence the Bank of England has been successful in controlling inflation in this way. Problems could well arise if Britain loses interest rates as a tool for its own economic objectives. ...read more.

Middle

This may hit small to medium sized businesses very hard. However this is very short-termist and I don't feel it is a significant argument against joining. The main argument for membership is that of the benefits that removing exchange rate uncertainty will bring. If there was a common currency within Europe, businesses could be more confident about investment, as they wouldn't need to worry about what effects fluctuating exchange rates would have on them. This should lead to greater investment in the Euro area and flourishing intra-European trade. A single currency also allows freer movement of labour between member states. This, again, should lead to greater investment and trade in the Euro region and greater overall European prosperity. By getting in early Britain can have greater political and economic influence in the creation and inevitable modification of the Euro zone. This would allow that the terms of the system are made as beneficial to her as possible. There is a danger that if Britiain is not actively involved and committed at this early stage, other nations will benefit from having created the terms of the union in their favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe our culture to be strong enough to retain a real identity without the pound. Britain has many strengths, economically and culturally, that should enable her to grow and become more prosperous. But this would undoubtedly be made easier by membership in a successful Euro zone. However, whether or not this is attainable is really the issue - can the differences between the member's economies be overcome? Is convergence possible? Will the Euro be successful? I would tentatively suggest that the answer to these questions is, in the long term, yes. On this basis I suggest that it is best for Britain to join soon. There is a real risk of failure and there will undoubtedly be problems in the short to medium term, but I feel it is worth the risk. In short, I think in principle Britain should join, but only when measures have been taken to ensure convergence and economic stability. I think the idea of tests before entry is a sound one, but unfortunately it seems they have been designed for use as a political tool. I can only hope that Gordon Brown and Tony Blair fully appreciate how much more important this decision is than whether or not Labour are re-elected. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Would It Be Economically Beneficial to Britain to Introduce An Obesity Tax?

    5 star(s)

    But how have these costs and benefits changed over the past century? One theory that has been put forward by two researchers at the University of Chicago (Tomas Philipson and Richard Posner) is that "the cost of expending calories has risen enormously over the course of the 20th century".

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    The most important incentive for retailers is the market potential and the competitive scenario rather than external factors like incentives. The government can make better use of these funds in the development and modernization of infrastructure. 7.4 Regulating FDI in Retail Even as governments in emerging markets dole out such

  1. Analysis of some fundamental arguments claimed by Albert Hirschman and Gunnar Myrdal

    Myrdal also pointed to the prejudicial factors which developed against such peripheral regions as being another obstacle to progress. Both Myrdal and Hirschman agreed on the importance of political forces in creating convergence on a regional and national level. Hirschman examined unbalanced growth in its geographical form as he built on Perroux's theory of Growth Poles.

  2. Liberalization: where it has lead us and where it is headed

    Most importantly, it is stable politically. India has been a multi-party democracy since its independence in 1947, with only a short interruption during the 1970s. In 1996, the voters turned the Congress Party, which had governed India for all but two brief periods since 1947, out of office.

  1. UK Membership of the European Monetary Union.

    By joining the single currency Britain would lose the ability to set interest rates and in future could have to endure rates quite inappropriate to the phase in its economic cycle (too high in times of recession or too low in times of boom).

  2. Entry criteria to the Euro

    There is a risk that the longer membership of the euro is delayed, the longer the potential gains in terms of increased inward investment are postponed. If sustainable and durable convergence is achieved, then we can be confident that the quantity and quality of investment would increase ensuring that the investment test was met.

  1. The un-utopian issue

    Substitution and stockpiling can more effectively over-come the scarcity problem. When these fail, traditional economies can - and have- also resorted to another solution: trade. Commerce can be a core instrument since it opens windows to other products (substitutes), which can dearly replenish a traditional economy's scarce product or service.

  2. "The British Government made a major mistake in not joining the Euro at its ...

    Significantly the ECB, with a strong German influence has no growth target whatsoever but focuses its monetary policy on ensuring that inflation within the Eurozone remains stable. The Euro is a deflationary project and is only concerned with low prices.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work