• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Britain Join the Euro?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

One of the primary arguments against joining is that there are severe structural differences between the members' economies. These may well undermine the success of the project, meaning Britain would do well to stay out. There is no guarantee that the Euro will be successful, and this is a key issue to consider when assessing whether or not Britain should join at this stage. Britain has already had her fingers burnt by the disastrous entry into the doomed European Exchange Rate Mechanism, the previous attempt to fix European currencies against each other which collapsed, plunging Britain into recession. Another key argument against entry is the loss of economic independence that would be seen from Euro membership. If Britain were to join the Euro, our interest rates, currently the tool used for control of inflation by the Bank of England, would be set by the European Central Bank (ECB). Since being given independence the Bank of England has been successful in controlling inflation in this way. Problems could well arise if Britain loses interest rates as a tool for its own economic objectives. ...read more.

Middle

This may hit small to medium sized businesses very hard. However this is very short-termist and I don't feel it is a significant argument against joining. The main argument for membership is that of the benefits that removing exchange rate uncertainty will bring. If there was a common currency within Europe, businesses could be more confident about investment, as they wouldn't need to worry about what effects fluctuating exchange rates would have on them. This should lead to greater investment in the Euro area and flourishing intra-European trade. A single currency also allows freer movement of labour between member states. This, again, should lead to greater investment and trade in the Euro region and greater overall European prosperity. By getting in early Britain can have greater political and economic influence in the creation and inevitable modification of the Euro zone. This would allow that the terms of the system are made as beneficial to her as possible. There is a danger that if Britiain is not actively involved and committed at this early stage, other nations will benefit from having created the terms of the union in their favour. ...read more.

Conclusion

I believe our culture to be strong enough to retain a real identity without the pound. Britain has many strengths, economically and culturally, that should enable her to grow and become more prosperous. But this would undoubtedly be made easier by membership in a successful Euro zone. However, whether or not this is attainable is really the issue - can the differences between the member's economies be overcome? Is convergence possible? Will the Euro be successful? I would tentatively suggest that the answer to these questions is, in the long term, yes. On this basis I suggest that it is best for Britain to join soon. There is a real risk of failure and there will undoubtedly be problems in the short to medium term, but I feel it is worth the risk. In short, I think in principle Britain should join, but only when measures have been taken to ensure convergence and economic stability. I think the idea of tests before entry is a sound one, but unfortunately it seems they have been designed for use as a political tool. I can only hope that Gordon Brown and Tony Blair fully appreciate how much more important this decision is than whether or not Labour are re-elected. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Would It Be Economically Beneficial to Britain to Introduce An Obesity Tax?

    5 star(s)

    VAT by up to 25%, excise duty by up to 10%). In contrast, direct taxes can only be changed in the annual budget. One advantage of indirect taxes is that they can be used explicitly to correct market failure caused by the obese population as externalities occur when the social costs of production or consumption exceed the state costs.

  2. Should Britain join the Euro?

    Euro, though it should be noted here that if we were to join the Euro, these Business' would lose out on revenue themselves. At the moment there are floating exchange rates between the Pound and the Euro, this makes it hard for a business dealing in imports and exports to

  1. Entry criteria to the Euro

    if membership of a larger financial market reduced the cost of finance. These costs could fall for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in particular if joining EMU lowers the barriers which prevent SMEs accessing Eurozone financial markets and lowers the cost of bank lending.

  2. Should we join the Euro?

    However, it has been over two years and they still not have pulled out. In order for the UK to join the Euro, it can take over 2 years to transfer all the money-related systems. Small British businesses would have to face a �6.2 billion cost for the transition metals.Tescos'

  1. Economics of European Integration

    The following classes can be distinguished: - Companies active in the manufacturing industry, where electricity represents a significant portion of total production costs; - Companies active in the service industry, where electricity only represents a minor cost; - Companies active in the primary sector and supplying raw materials (like coal)

  2. Assess weather or not the United Kingdom should join the single currency.

    Ease of trade would also increase and price transparency2 would occur causing prices to fall, at the moment Britain has been dubbed "rip-off Britain" due to its continuous high prices and costs of living. However if prices of necessities like food and clothing would fall people would have more to spend on luxury goods therefore quality of living would increase.

  1. UK Membership of the European Monetary Union.

    A perverse consequence of the implementation of the euro is that it will promote a greater level of specialisation, thus increasing the chance of asymmetric shocks. The live question is whether the diminution if national sovereignty is worth the gains of labour and market flexibility, and low interest rates.

  2. The Quest for Optimal Asset Allocation Strategies in Integrating Europe.

    The spanning test compares the whole set of efficient portfolios and tests whether the addition of the other set of indices (eg adding industries to a current portfolio of country-indices) gives significantly better portfolios. A rejection of the spanning test means that the country indices do not span the universe

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work