• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  40. 40
    40

The Effects of Non-monetary Incentives on Employees

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Running Head: THE EFFECTS OF NON-MONETARY INCENTIVES ON EMPLOYEES The Effects of Non-monetary Incentives on Employees [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] The Effects of Non-monetary Incentives on Employees Chapter 1: Introduction ?utlin? Thi? r????rch f?cu??? ?n th? v?ri?u? ??p?ct? ?f N?n-m?n?t?ry Inc?ntiv?? ?n ?mpl?y??? ?nd c?mpri??? ?f th? f?ll?wing ch?pt?r?: (1) Intr?ducti?n (2) Lit?r?tur? R?vi?w (3) Pr?p???d M?th?d?l?gy R?ti?n?l? Thi? ?tudy highlight? m?ny i??u?? r?l?t?d t? N?n-m?n?t?ry Inc?ntiv?? ?nd giv?? ? br??d ?n?ly?i? ?f t?ngibl? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv?? t? ?cc?mpli?h ? firm'? ?mpl?y?? m?tiv?ti?n g??l? b?tt?r th?n ? c??h inc?ntiv? ?f ?qu?l m?rk?t v?lu?. Firm? f?c? th? ch?ll?ng? ?f m?tiv?ting th?ir ?mpl?y??? t? put f?rth th? ?ppr?pri?t? ?m?unt ?nd typ? ?f ?ff?rt. ?n? t??l firm? u?? t? ?cc?mpli?h thi? ?bj?ctiv? i? th? u?? ?f ? lump-?um b?nu?. F?r ?x?mpl?, ? firm might giv? ? ??l??p?r??n ? $5,000 c??h b?nu? f?r ?xc??ding hi? ?r h?r qu?t? f?r th? y??r. ?lt?rn?tiv?ly, th? firm c?n pr?vid? high-?nd m?rch?ndi?? ?r v?c?ti?n tr?v?l ?uch ?? ? trip t? H?w?ii f?r which th? ?mpl?y?? w?uld n??d t? p?y $5,000. I will u?? th? t?rm t?ngibl? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv? t? d??crib? inc?ntiv?? lik? thi? trip t? H?w?ii which ?r? p?rf?rm?nc? b???d, n?n-c??h, with n?n-trivi?l m?rk?t v?lu?. Wh?n ch???ing th? typ? ?f ?xtrin?ic inc?ntiv? t? ?ff?r, ? firm w?uld lik? t? d?t?rmin? which inc?ntiv? w?uld b? th? m??t m?tiv?ting f?r it? ?mpl?y???, ?? th?t it c?n r?c?iv? th? m??t imp?ct p?r d?ll?r ?p?nt. ?t?nd?rd ?c?n?mic th??ry ??y? th?t c??h i? ?lw?y? b??t du? t? ?pti?n v?lu? ?nd thi? r??ult i? ?l?? f?und in ?urv?y r??ult? which c?nfirm th?t m??t p??pl? ?t?t? ? pr?f?r?nc? f?r c??h inc?ntiv?? (H?in, 1998). In thi? p?p?r, I will di?cu?? why c??h i? n?t ?lw?y? th? b??t ?xtrin?ic inc?ntiv? t? u?? ?nd why t?ngibl? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv?? m?y ?cc?mpli?h ? firm'? ?bj?ctiv?? b?tt?r th?n ? c??h ?w?rd ?f ?qu?l m?rk?t v?lu?. Und?r?t?nding why ?nd wh?n t? u?? ...read more.

Middle

? purch??? ?f th? ??m? it?m by th? ?mpl?y?? w?uld n?t c?rry th? ??m? ??ci?l v?lu? ?? if it w?r? ?w?rd?d by th? firm. ?nc? th? m?n?y i? giv?n t? th? ?mpl?y?? it b?c?m?? th? ?mpl?y??'? m?n?y ?nd th?r?f?r? ?nything purch???d with it i? ??m?thing th? ?mpl?y?? ch??? t? purch??? r?th?r th?n ??m?thing th? firm g?v? t? th? ?mpl?y??. F?mily, fri?nd?, ?nd c?ll??gu?? will ?l?? b? m?r? lik?ly t? vi?w th? trip ?r ?th?r purch??? ?? ??m?thing th? ?mpl?y?? b?ught r?th?r th?n ??m?thing th?y r?c?iv?d f?r g??d p?rf?rm?nc?. Th??? i??u?? m?k? th? link b?tw??n th? c?mp?ny ?nd th? ?w?rd w??k?r ?nd ?? w?uld n?t pr?vid? th? ??m? m??n? ?f di?cu??ing g??d p?rf?rm?nc?. ?n ?dditi?n?l ?id? b?n?fit t? th? u?? ?f t?ngibl? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv?? i? th?t th?y ??rv? ?? r?mind?r? ?f th? g??d p?rf?rm?nc? th?t l?d t? th?ir r?c?ipt. Phy?ic?l g??d? lik? ? big ?cr??n t?l?vi?i?n will r?mind th? ?mpl?y?? ?v?ry tim? th?y turn it ?n. V?c?ti?n tr?v?l will pr?vid? m?m?ri??, pictur??, ?nd m?m?nt?? th?t will d? th? ??m? thing. C??h ?w?rd? c?n ?l?? d? thi? pr?vid?d th?y ?r? ?w?rd?d with ??m? phy?ic?l m?rk?r ?uch ?? ? c?rtific?t? ?r ? pl?qu? ?f ??m? ??rt. Wh?t m?k?? ? t?ngibl? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv? m?r? ?ff?ctiv? i? th? vi?ibility ?f thi? typ? ?f ?w?rd ?nd th? l?ck ?f ??ci?l n?rm? ?g?in?t di?cu??ing thi? typ? ?f ?w?rd. Pr?p??iti?n 4: Th? pr?dict?d utility ?f ??rning ? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv? will incr???? with th? ??ci?l utility ?f th? ?w?rd. Th? ??ci?l utility ?f th? ?w?rd will incr???? with th? ???? with which th?t ?w?rd c?n b? di?cu???d with ?th?r?. ?? with th? i??u? ?f ju?tifi?bility, th? n?tur? ?f r?inf?rc?m?nt ?bt?in?d fr?m ? t?ngibl? n?n-m?n?t?ry inc?ntiv? i? lik?ly t? v?ry ?cr??? ?rg?niz?ti?n?l ?nd n?ti?n?l cultur??. ??m? ?rg?niz?ti?n?l cultur?? h?v? f?w?r pr??cripti?n? ?g?in?t di?cu??ing c??h b?nu???. F?r ?x?mpl?, inv??tm?nt b?nk?r? ?r? ?ft?n ?xp?ct?d t? br?g ?b?ut th?ir inc?m?. ??ci?l r?c?gniti?n l?vi?h?d ?n ?n individu?l in ? c?ll?ctivi?t cultur? might l??d t? l??? utility c?nv?y?d fr?m th? ?w?rd, wh?r??? ??rning ?dmir?ti?n fr?m ?n?'? gr?up m?y b? ...read more.

Conclusion

L. 1988. How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior: 44-62. Toronto: Hogrefe International. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. 1993. Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49: 11-36. Shore, L. M., & Shore, T.H. (1995). Perceived organizational support and perceived justice. In R. Crompanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace: 149-164. Westport, CT: Quorum. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., and Near, J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 653-665. Solnick, S. J. & Hemenway, D. 1996. The deadweight loss of Christmas: Reply. American Economic Review, 86: 1299-1305. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. 1997. A meta-analysis of the effects of organizational behavior modification on task performance, 1975-1995. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 1122-1149. Steers, R. M. 1977. Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 46-56. Thaler, R. H., 1980. Towards a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1: 39-60 Thaler, R. H. 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4: 199-214. Thaler, R. H. 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavior Decision Making, 12: 183-206. Thaler, R., & Johnson, E. J. 1990. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36: 643-660. Tolchinsky, P. D., & King, D. C. 1980. Do goals mediate the effects of incentives on performance? The Academy of Management Review, 5: 455-467 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice, a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106:1039-1061. Vroom, V. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Waldfogel, J. 1993. The deadweight loss of Christmas. American Economic Review, 83:1328-1336. Waldfogel, J. 1996. The deadweight loss of Christmas: Reply. American Economic Review, 86: 1306-1308. Welsh, D. H. B., Luthans, F., & Sommer, S. M. 1993. Managing Russian factory workers: The impact of U.S.-based behavioral and participative techniques. The Academy of Management Journal, 36: 58-79. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Non-monetary Incentives ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Business, Companies and Organisation, Activity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Business, Companies and Organisation, Activity essays

  1. English for business

    Do you agree or disagree: 1.An essential ingredient of a happy day is mental stimulation, as well as a spiritual and artistic one. 2. Lack of control is the root cause of much unease and uncertainty. 3. Objectives that are too easy will lead us to be complacent, accepting mediocre performance.

  2. Business Studies

    protection are falling > Tensions in relation to trade agreements - not all sectors of the economy are treated equally - International organisations and treaties General agreement on tariffs and trade 1947 > First multilateral trade agreement between western countries to promote trade by reducing protection > Brought about successful

  1. Business (Assignment Pl (Pur,Own,Size&scale))

    This company is based in the United 'kingdom and the Republic of Irelands; they have over 1,700 stores across Europe including Germany, France and Spain. Their scale of business is across Europe; in addition this helps the company to be well known and recognisable in Europe Garvey`s Garvey's is a

  2. What is PR?

    In the long term, managing relationships successfully requires ethical conduct. So effective PR cannot be about deception and manipulation, i.e., propaganda. Real PR builds Trust, and Credibility and real PR requires honesty, a genuine concern for the needs and expectations of the publics and dialogue, i.e., listening as well as talking.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work