• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Russian economy - transition from command economy to mixed.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Russian economy- transition from command economy to mixed The Soviet Union broke up in 1991. After that Boris Yeltsin came to power in Russia. At that time the Russian economy was a planned economy. It was going through an economic crisis. To overcome the economic problems attempts were made to transform the planned Russian economy into a free market one. Price controls on 90% of the goods were abolished. Foreign investors were allowed to invest in Russia and a number of other reforms were introduced. But the main problem was that the Russian economy, which in the previous years had almost been stagnated, was not ready for this sudden transformation. A newspaper report published towards the end of 1992 said that quite a large population of Russia did not even now how to use cheques. ...read more.

Middle

The Russian economy is at a stage where the strong gain and the weak lose. Analysis of the transition period If the transition period of the Russian economy was to be analyzed and if short-term effects are to be considered, then the obvious sufferers from this transition were the common people belonging to the lower strata of society and it was the rich industrialists who benefited. But if the other side of the coin was observed, had this transition not taken place, had the attempts to make the Russian economy a free-market economy not taken place only. Then in the long run it would have been the people or Russia who would have lost out. The point, which cannot be forgotten here is that globalization, is an evitable process today. If not immediately, in the near future full-scale globalization will happen and if the transition in the Russian economy had NOT taken place, Russia wouldn't have been ready for this process. ...read more.

Conclusion

History stands as a witness that no country has been able to progress independently or by self0sufficiency. In order to progress it was important for Russia to enter into the global-race. True the people suffered hardships, but the unemployment which today stands at an unofficial 18% would have been much higher otherwise. Because why would the people of Russia buy low quality goods form their local market at a higher cost when they would have got better quality goods form outside at a cheaper rate? True that Russia has a society wherein the strong gain and the weak loose but this is on a comparative scale. Because had it no been for this transition which in a way proved to be a good SHOCK to the Russian economy, Russia would have been left out like those countries where the local population still does not know who to use cheques, who are far away form the world secluded in an area which probably none of us know. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Free essay

    What are the main characteristics of a free market economy and centrally planned economy?

    choice and the way they run their business, which means that they have property rights. As a result, there will most likely be more firms, and thus more competition, which, in the long-term, will allow development, and technological advancements to help minimize resources and maximize the quality of goods.

  2. Assess the relative merits and demerits of a market economy. Why have each East ...

    In a market economy there may be a variety of goods, but they will also be out of the price range of the poorest in society who don't have the ability to pay for it.

  1. The Mixed Market and the Command/Planned Economy.

    In the market economy, through risk taking and competition, people have the chance to be become very rich, but this implies that it could have been done at someone's expense; in other words, while the income of the more competitive individual has increased, the other individual that "lost" at the competition has now a lower income.

  2. The Social Balance - The Mixed Economy.

    They pass on into a countryside that has been rendered largely invisible by commercial art. They picnic on exquisitely packaged food from a portable icebox by a polluted stream and go on to spend the night as a park3 which is a menace to public health and morals.

  1. The mixed market economy.

    One advantage of the Market Economy is that consumers and suppliers have freedom of choice. But the most important advantage in the Market Economy is the price mechanism, which determines the allocation of resources efficiently. The price mechanism, as shown in diagram 1, includes the demand curve D and the

  2. This report will establish the opportunities and threats presented to Sony by the EU ...

    This does allow high competition with supermarkets and Sony but as Sony has now merge with Dixions they are better off because they have now more power and money to dominate the price of products and still allows competition. Sony should consider in persuading more of the UK Economists to

  1. Features of command economies

    Since the stagnant technical progress, there were limited and rough goods for consumers to choose. The environmental protection wasn't taken well. For example, the command economies of the old Soviet bloc inflicted a level of damage on their environment which is unparalleled in human history.

  2. Outline the main features of a market economy and compare it to a Command ...

    This means that individuals in the economy have the right to own their own property such as capital which are man made aids to production such as land, machinery and buildings. The entrepreneurs in a free-market economy are allowed to use this capital to make an income by producing goods and services with this capital for the consumers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work