• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do market failures result in a similar optimal allocation of resources to the innovation process? What might EU Policy do to correct such failures?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do market failures result in a similar optimal allocation of resources to the innovation process? What might EU Policy do to correct such failures? Innovation has a crucial impact on the standards of living in particular economy. It is generally agreed that research and innovation are the main sources of growth and job creation in market economies. i.e. output is increased through greater acquisition of knowledge. Subsequently, 2 things matter for economic growth: savings and the state of the productive knowledge (i.e. shows how productivity the extra capital will be used). The production function diagram below can illustrate this Where labour productivity per worker experiences diminishing marginal returns This diagram shows how economic growth can be realised by accumulation of capital and/or higher levels of knowledge. It should be noted that productivity growth is the difference between the growth of inputs and the growth of outputs and that technological progress is measured as residual-so that any problems with measuring inputs or outputs, will be transferred onto measuring technological progress. There are 2 movements on the diagram: a to b - due to the accumulation of capital and b to c - due to the growth of productivity or technical progress. ...read more.


The innovation process both generates and is influenced by uncertainty and this aspect of market failure is particularly damaging to the possibility of a Pareto-efficient allocation of resources to invention and innovation. It is the inherent level of uncertainty, which most distinguishes an R+D project from a traditional industrial investment project. Innovation entails numerous scientific, technological and commercial uncertainties, which make it difficult for financial bankers to forecast results and monitor their investment project. Put briefly, missing or future markets for contingent claims in an uncertain world do not exist in any sense sufficiently for individuals to take risks in an optimal fashion. In addition to the uncertainties, providers of capital face another major difficulty: this derives from the intangible nature of innovation and the fact that investment cost is not recoverable. Consequently, the percentage of innovation projects, which are successful and generate a return on a large investment, is usually low. Thus financial backers insist on real guarantees to cover themselves if the investment fails. It is difficult to ascertain optimal levels of innovation in an uncertain world due to the existence of information asymmetries; Stiglitz (1991) makes it clear, that the resulting unequal distribution of knowledge creates problems of adverse selection and moral hazard, which deny the possibility of Pareto-optimality. ...read more.


The EU introduced a science and technology policy as to corrective for pervasive market failures and also due to the emergence of the single European market. The policy emphasised obvious areas of collaboration for R+D and innovation in order to be more competitive with USA and Japan and to compete with the low wages in South America. Currently, member states are spending 1.9% of their resources on innovation compared with 2.5% in Japan and 2.7% in USA. Recently, the EU set the target at an overenthusiastic 3% The policy corrects market failures in uncertainties by appropriating price structures in the missing markets and thereby reducing distortions. Moreover, missing markets imply the need for agents to form expectations on the likely private values of their questions, expectations which policy can certainly influence. Given all these difficulties, which arise from the innovation process, it would seem to be wishful thinking to imagine that scientific and technological progress could be adequately funded in all the market economies without some form of government assistance. However one needs to recognise that government intervention can fail as well. Such examples are, imperfect information, the benefit between those who pay and those who benefit, bureaucratic capture and pressure group activity. It does not automatically follow that government policy will be welfare-improving. This is particularly so with respect to innovative activates, the formulation of which entails access to detailed microeconomic and social information ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. The allocation of resources

    At these equilibrium prices, the market distributes the products to the purchasers according to each purchaser's use (or utility) for each product and within the relative limits of each buyer's purchasing power.

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    This estimate is based on the fact that incomes and consumer demand are likely to grow at a faster pace as the economy performs well, lifestyles continue to change and better product and shopping options would become available. On the regulations front also, it is likely that several important changes will take place, e.g.

  1. Chinese car market overview. Citroen case study

    SAIC is joint venture partners with both VW and GM.To the chagrin of global carmakers, competition in China's car industry will be ever more ruthless in the days to come. (DUNNE, 2002) D) GOVERNMENT POLICIES The Chinese government has encouraged the private ownership of cars in its most recent Five Year Plan.

  2. Bellway Plc is a holding company with subsidiaries; its main subsidiary company is Bellway ...

    * Turnover Wilson turnover incorporates income received through commercial activity whilst Bellways do not but include rental income. * Depreciation Method of depreciation will affect the net asset value, net profit and return on capital employed. Both companies have got different policies, which will impact the profit.

  1. To what extent was Nazi economic policy ideologically driven?

    The four year plan undoubtedly achieved some great success in terms of output in most areas and in some cases such as Brown coal the change in output was dramatic. It is not surprising though that given between 1936 and 1939 two-thirds of all investment went in to war-related industries

  2. mergers and acquisition

    where it will have some degree of control over price and will allow the combined company to increase the price of goods and services sold because customers have fewer alternatives sources of supply. He states that market power can also be created from downstream mergers which are often formed in

  1. Monetary policy of a globalised economy

    large country, the small country no longer has an independent monetary policy. The small country's policy must be devoted to ensuring that its interest rates are aligned with its partners. Macroeconomic policy in such a situation is therefore exactly the case described in our multiplier model above.

  2. This report will establish the opportunities and threats presented to Sony by the EU ...

    Competition: economic rivalry or competition is another essential feature of a free enterprise economy because it is seen as price competition. Consumers have a major influence on competition. This means that supply and demand influence market price, which also have power on businesses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work