• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do market failures result in a similar optimal allocation of resources to the innovation process? What might EU Policy do to correct such failures?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do market failures result in a similar optimal allocation of resources to the innovation process? What might EU Policy do to correct such failures? Innovation has a crucial impact on the standards of living in particular economy. It is generally agreed that research and innovation are the main sources of growth and job creation in market economies. i.e. output is increased through greater acquisition of knowledge. Subsequently, 2 things matter for economic growth: savings and the state of the productive knowledge (i.e. shows how productivity the extra capital will be used). The production function diagram below can illustrate this Where labour productivity per worker experiences diminishing marginal returns This diagram shows how economic growth can be realised by accumulation of capital and/or higher levels of knowledge. It should be noted that productivity growth is the difference between the growth of inputs and the growth of outputs and that technological progress is measured as residual-so that any problems with measuring inputs or outputs, will be transferred onto measuring technological progress. There are 2 movements on the diagram: a to b - due to the accumulation of capital and b to c - due to the growth of productivity or technical progress. ...read more.

Middle

The innovation process both generates and is influenced by uncertainty and this aspect of market failure is particularly damaging to the possibility of a Pareto-efficient allocation of resources to invention and innovation. It is the inherent level of uncertainty, which most distinguishes an R+D project from a traditional industrial investment project. Innovation entails numerous scientific, technological and commercial uncertainties, which make it difficult for financial bankers to forecast results and monitor their investment project. Put briefly, missing or future markets for contingent claims in an uncertain world do not exist in any sense sufficiently for individuals to take risks in an optimal fashion. In addition to the uncertainties, providers of capital face another major difficulty: this derives from the intangible nature of innovation and the fact that investment cost is not recoverable. Consequently, the percentage of innovation projects, which are successful and generate a return on a large investment, is usually low. Thus financial backers insist on real guarantees to cover themselves if the investment fails. It is difficult to ascertain optimal levels of innovation in an uncertain world due to the existence of information asymmetries; Stiglitz (1991) makes it clear, that the resulting unequal distribution of knowledge creates problems of adverse selection and moral hazard, which deny the possibility of Pareto-optimality. ...read more.

Conclusion

The EU introduced a science and technology policy as to corrective for pervasive market failures and also due to the emergence of the single European market. The policy emphasised obvious areas of collaboration for R+D and innovation in order to be more competitive with USA and Japan and to compete with the low wages in South America. Currently, member states are spending 1.9% of their resources on innovation compared with 2.5% in Japan and 2.7% in USA. Recently, the EU set the target at an overenthusiastic 3% The policy corrects market failures in uncertainties by appropriating price structures in the missing markets and thereby reducing distortions. Moreover, missing markets imply the need for agents to form expectations on the likely private values of their questions, expectations which policy can certainly influence. Given all these difficulties, which arise from the innovation process, it would seem to be wishful thinking to imagine that scientific and technological progress could be adequately funded in all the market economies without some form of government assistance. However one needs to recognise that government intervention can fail as well. Such examples are, imperfect information, the benefit between those who pay and those who benefit, bureaucratic capture and pressure group activity. It does not automatically follow that government policy will be welfare-improving. This is particularly so with respect to innovative activates, the formulation of which entails access to detailed microeconomic and social information ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Do We Need Government Intervention To Ensure An Efficient Allocation of Resources?

    Markets may sometimes fail, but this does have reasons, which can be put into the following five categories; lack of competition, existing externalities, missing markets, factor immobility and the issue of inequality in society. When a film has the chance to dominate a market it will restrict supply in order to raise the market price.

  2. The mixed market economy and the allocation of resources.

    And producers and consumers base their production or consumption plans on the current market price. At the moment the market economy is a very good way to allocate resources, but it is not perfect as this Production Possibilities Frontier diagram shows us. This is because the market economy (grey dot)

  1. Supply side policy.

    Deregulation This is closely linked to privatisation. De-regulation means the opening up of markets to greater competition. The aim of this is to increase market supply (driving prices down)

  2. Outline the reasons why the process of industrialization in developing countries might require government ...

    1997 80 35 Secondary school enrolment rate (%) 1997 89 25 Life expectancy 1997 (Years) 47 43 Source: 'How Botswana Did It: Comparative Development In Sub-Saharan Africa.' - Daron Acemoglu et al. All of these factors can be seen as indicators of development the higher the figure the better here in all cases.

  1. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    These stores are often located in rural homes and serve to supplement the family's income from agriculture. Kiosks: These small, pavement stalls stock a limited range of food and beverage items. Kiosks are convenient for impulse or emergency purchases, and are located in busy commercial and market areas.

  2. The project objective is to investigate the practices of privatization in traditional market economies ...

    Stimulation of the Singapore Stock Market By privatizing SingTel via the issuance of stocks, it encourages public involvement in the stock market as the general public has confidence in a large and strong company like SingTel. This stimulates the development of the Singapore stock market which at that time was

  1. China or India? Many companies ask themselves this question. Due to saturated markets, increasing ...

    An advantage is its increasing middle class, which is already enormous with 100-250 million people. This market segment is relatively wealthy and can afford to buy also western products and services. It provides a huge opportunity for western companies to target this segment.

  2. The Quest for Optimal Asset Allocation Strategies in Integrating Europe.

    For that purpose, the Financial Services Action Plan has been established by the European Commission. The action plan is instituted so as to create an integrated European capital market that provides access to low cost capital and to foster a vibrant venture capital industry in Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work