• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

Was the performance of the French economy in the 1930's entirely a question of mistakes in economic policy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the performance of the French economy in the 1930's entirely a question of mistakes in economic policy? When evaluating the French economy in the 1930's what quickly becomes evident is the plethora of writings available on the subject and consequently the challenge facing anybody looking to disentangle the numerous interpretations offered as to how the French economy performed and also why it performed as it did. Writings focussing on the causes of the economic performance of the French economy in the 1930's generally fall into two broad camps. The first camp, which is favoured amongst economists, argues the performance of the economy was inextricably linked to the economic policies that the government chose to adopt. The second camp, which historians are more likely to ally themselves with, sees the performance of the economy being caused by a more deep seated problem in France, that of the countries structural weaknesses which can be traced back long before the 1930's. It shall therefore firstly be necessary to examine France's economic policies in the interwar years to ascertain if these policies had a bearing on the performance of the economy in the 1930's, before moving on to evaluate other possible factors for France's economic performance. These factors range from her demographic problems, the problems of agriculture and confidence of the bourgeoisie to the worldwide economic depression. Finally, after an attempt to unravel these intricate factors, a conclusion will be made. Any writings specifically relating to French economic policy in the 1930's usually centres on the French reluctance to devalue the franc Poincare until the Popular Front government of 1936. ...read more.

Middle

It was not solely economic policy that affected the performance of the French economy, France had several structural problems to contend with and this subsequently leads anyone assessing French economic performance in the 1930's to refute the assertion that her performance was entirely the result of mistakes in economic policy. Firstly, France had a demographic make-up not ideally suited to the economic problems facing her in the 1930's. Virtual stagnation in population growth and the heavy losses of the younger male population during the first World War resulted in the immigration of some 2 million people, but this could not prevent the number of under-twenties falling from 34 per cent to 31 per cent in the period 1911 to 1936 and the proportion of over sixties rising from 12 to 14 per cent.15 An ageing and stagnant population acted as a restraint on the economy because of, for example, the higher number of pensions issued while the decline in numbers of young males reduced France's industrial capacity. Secondly, the political inertia that gripped France played a negative role in the performance of the French economy. The political system and the way in which politics was conducted in France were not well suited to making quick decisions and being able to coherently follow these policies through. S. B. Clough argues that a sense of antagonism had developed within French politics, complicated by the great number of political parties, the harsh and hostile partisan press, the necessity for coalition government, and consequent parliamentary inefficiency, resulting in the periodic inability of the state to perform its functions and amongst these state functions was, of course, economic ...read more.

Conclusion

French life in the 1930's that this problem plagued France and played a pivotal role in affecting the performance of the French economy. Furthermore, it was this crisis of confidence that bred many of the other factors that negatively affected France's economic performance. In conclusion, the economic policies of the French governments in the 1930's did have a bearing on the performance of the economy. A closer integration into the international markets and economies along with a quicker decision to devalue the franc could have promoted a better economic performance. Although it is understandable the difficulties the French government faced in conducting the correct economic policy given the often inefficient nature of French politics and also the necessity to appease the electorate, this still does not retract from the fact that French economic policy was, on the whole, inadequate. However, France's economic performance was far from being entirely the result of mistakes in economic policy as structural problems played an equally if not more significant role in France's difficulties in grappling with the economic problems they faced. These structural factors are somewhat harder to quantify but the implications they had on the French economy were far reaching and deep-seated, furthermore without these weaknesses, mistakes in economic policy may have been avoided or at worst better remedied. In any case the advent of the economic depression served to shore up these underlying structural problems and this created the crisis of confidence that engulfed all of France, finally it was within this negative framework that mistakes in economic policy were made with the consequent negative effect this had on the performance of the French economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. The Nature of Macroeconomics

    productivity and expands the PPF, improves human capital as technology improves productivity * Arises from quality of education, R & D and availability of finance for investment The significance of resource allocation in economic growth * Restructure corporations to cut cost, improve flexibility and make better use of technology *

  2. Economics - Classical School of Thought, Keynesian School of Thought, Supply Side School of ...

    He said, "The basic long-run objectives, shared, I am sure by most economists, are political freedom, economic efficiency and substantial equality of economic power...I believe-and at this stage agreement will be far less widespread - that all three objectives can best be realized by relying, as far as possible, on

  1. Free essay

    The Economic Impact of the London 2012 Olympics

    ?umm?d t? giv? th? GV? ?nd imp?rt imp?ct ?f ?ll t?uri?m ?p?nding, wh?r? th? imp?rt imp?ct figur? mu?t ?l?? includ? t?uri?t?' dir?ct purch???? ?f imp?rt?. Th? GDP imp?ct ?f t?uri?m ?xp?rt? c?n th?n b? d?riv?d by ?dding t?x?ti?n ?n t?uri?t?' ?p?nding ?nt? th? t?t?l GV?

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    Supermarkets/Hypermarkets: These are large (20,000 square feet plus) self-service stores selling a variety of products at discounted prices. The best practice chains in this format are Carrefour (France), Wal-Mart (US), Kroger (US), Tesco (UK) and Metro (Germany). Supermarkets tend to be located in key residential markets and malls, and offer

  1. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    the EMBI Global Index increases by 1%, the liquidity of the Merrill Lynch Index increases by 0.330581%. This also holds theoretically because of the fact that the two bond markets are competing asset classes. Thus, a sell-off in one market will probably be as a result of investors switching their positions into the opposing market.

  2. Case Study: The Home Depot

    For small items they can go to many different hardware/ DIY etc store. For larger products the consumers are likely to go to one of the superstores like Home Depot. Bargaining power owned by consumers at these kind of stores is lower.

  1. Causes of the Great Depression

    That same top 0.1% of Americans in 1929 controlled 34% of all savings, while 80% of Americans had no savings at all. Automotive industry mogul Henry Ford provides a striking example of the unequal distribution of wealth between the rich and the middle-class.

  2. Why has Nucor performed so well in the past?

    This adds significant potential profit to the market. Also "price, quality and dependability were the three most important buyer purchasing criteria" (Nucor Case, 1990) in the steel industry which manifested in the increasing level of cheaper imports. Nucor's pioneering "cheaper" technology would easily combat this and help them attain high levels of market share.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work