• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What have been the economic effects of the transition away from central planning in Eastern European economies?

Extracts from this document...


What have been the economic effects of the transition away from central planning in Eastern European economies? Economic systems exist in order to resolve the basic economic problem, which is the concept of scarcity of resources in a world of infinite human wants. Eastern European countries became command economies following the communist take-over of their governments. A centrally planned economy is one where the state owns all the resources and factors of production with no private ownership. The state makes all the economic decisions and allocates all the resources through a complex planning system. All of the production is carried out by State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and consumers are directed in what they can buy and there is no free choice of unemployment. The motivation behind the system is 'working together for the common good' where top priorities include being as self-sufficient as possible and being independent of capital economies. Also, the aim of this economy was to allocate resources with minimal use of the price mechanism and encourage rapid economic growth. In the past, centrally planned economies traded with other economies of the same sort. Those that were poorly developed followed Marxist ideology, which had extreme socialist ideas that aim for full employment, for everyone to have a reasonable standard of living and to be an equal a society as possible. There were advantages and disadvantages to the command economy. On the positive side, the economy provided a reasonable standard of living for everyone. ...read more.


This means that individuals have to make their own decisions about production and may prefer to be cautious and produce less at the beginning so they do not over produce and lose money. They are not used to having to make important decisions for themselves and need to learn from their own experiences about exact quantities that they need to produce. The industries had difficulty obtaining the raw materials that they need and may also have problems transporting their products to the markets. There was disruption across other countries, which were also in the transition process, because of the fact that certain factories and shops cut down on imports due to the uncertainty of being able to pay for them. Also, the option of importing for less from countries in the West was now open when it had previously been banned, which meant that countries had the whole world to choose imports from. The countries that were worst affected by falls in GDP generally saw a large growth in their informal sectors. Ukraine, for example, had an informal sector that was approaching the size of its formal sector in 1998. The large falls in output led to sharp rises in unemployment. One of the advantages of a command economy was that it ensured almost no unemployment, and the shift to a market system led to a change in the employment situation. Many enterprises went out of business and factories and plants were closed, which created unemployed workers. ...read more.


Wage inequalities increased the gap between wealth differences. Also, as a market economy rewards those with higher levels of human capital, when in the past coal miners were paid more than doctors were, in a mixed economy this switched around. The transition period lasted different lengths of time for different countries. Where some countries, such as the Ukraine, failed to transform into a market economy. By 2000, the official GDP had fallen to one third of its level in 1989. Government provided services such as education and healthcare are under-funded, as the tax base is very low. Since 1990, all those people who rely on the state for their income, such as doctors and pensioners, have seen a fall in their real income. Criminal activity has been encouraged and investment has been discouraged due to the lack of rule of law in the economic sphere. Therefore, long term growth prospects do not look promising in the Ukraine. In general, Eastern European countries have managed their transitions relatively well, and they are all aiming to join the European Union. To do this they need to match their legal systems with the rest of the EU law and need to have stable currency along with low inflation. As we can see, there have been many effects of the transition away from central planning in Eastern Europe. There have been effects on output, unemployment, inflation, ownership and wealth, the distribution of resources and government finances. In most cases these have not been positive changes to begin with but have over time improved and now have a better prospective for the future economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Economics questions - economies of scale.

    Only the offer of higher wages will convince them to stay and work. This raises the firm's costs of production. 5. How firms grow? As firms grow larger they may have many benefits. The main one is the ability to enjoy Internal Economies of Scale.

  2. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    Also in this article, Amihud et al. (1986) found that a difference in the liquidity of US Treasury Bills and US Treasury Bonds affects yields to maturity. This leads them to conclude that expected returns are a decreasing function of liquidity because investors require compensation for higher transactions costs in less liquid markets.

  1. Features of command economies

    are willing to pay, someone will find a way of supplying what you want. In some parts of Eastern Europe the black markets were fairly open affairs. Those problems above caused many of these economies to place greater emphasis on market forces as a means of allocation resources.

  2. UK Membership of the European Monetary Union.

    We want to be a focus for enterprise, investment, productivity, growth, wealth-creation and high employment. There is more than one reason for doubting possible benefits of the EMU. It has become obvious that the union is politically driven rather than economically.

  1. Contrasting Economic Value Systems in Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard

    economic opportunities in Russia, and is most willing to offer his expertise to his former employers. Recognizing the potential of the estate's riverside property now made easily accessible to the nearby town's growing population by the railroad, Lopakhin conjures up a comprehensive plan of real estate development that would solve the gentry's fiscal problems for decades.

  2. Economics of European Integration

    The following classes can be distinguished: - Companies active in the manufacturing industry, where electricity represents a significant portion of total production costs; - Companies active in the service industry, where electricity only represents a minor cost; - Companies active in the primary sector and supplying raw materials (like coal)

  1. The project objective is to investigate the practices of privatization in traditional market economies ...

    These include capital market, political, and firm-specific factors. Specifically, they found that SIP is the preferred choice when 1) there is more even distribution of income, 2) the government hopes to simultaneously develop the capital market, and 3) the state business is profitable.

  2. Spain's Transition to the European Union

    The EU strongly felt there was a need for democracy before joining and thus the dictatorial government under Franco meant that full membership was out of the question as long as he remained in power. The motion towards parliamentary democracy began moving only following the death of Franco in 1975,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work