• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What have been the economic effects of the transition away from central planning in Eastern European economies?

Extracts from this document...


What have been the economic effects of the transition away from central planning in Eastern European economies? Economic systems exist in order to resolve the basic economic problem, which is the concept of scarcity of resources in a world of infinite human wants. Eastern European countries became command economies following the communist take-over of their governments. A centrally planned economy is one where the state owns all the resources and factors of production with no private ownership. The state makes all the economic decisions and allocates all the resources through a complex planning system. All of the production is carried out by State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and consumers are directed in what they can buy and there is no free choice of unemployment. The motivation behind the system is 'working together for the common good' where top priorities include being as self-sufficient as possible and being independent of capital economies. Also, the aim of this economy was to allocate resources with minimal use of the price mechanism and encourage rapid economic growth. In the past, centrally planned economies traded with other economies of the same sort. Those that were poorly developed followed Marxist ideology, which had extreme socialist ideas that aim for full employment, for everyone to have a reasonable standard of living and to be an equal a society as possible. There were advantages and disadvantages to the command economy. On the positive side, the economy provided a reasonable standard of living for everyone. ...read more.


This means that individuals have to make their own decisions about production and may prefer to be cautious and produce less at the beginning so they do not over produce and lose money. They are not used to having to make important decisions for themselves and need to learn from their own experiences about exact quantities that they need to produce. The industries had difficulty obtaining the raw materials that they need and may also have problems transporting their products to the markets. There was disruption across other countries, which were also in the transition process, because of the fact that certain factories and shops cut down on imports due to the uncertainty of being able to pay for them. Also, the option of importing for less from countries in the West was now open when it had previously been banned, which meant that countries had the whole world to choose imports from. The countries that were worst affected by falls in GDP generally saw a large growth in their informal sectors. Ukraine, for example, had an informal sector that was approaching the size of its formal sector in 1998. The large falls in output led to sharp rises in unemployment. One of the advantages of a command economy was that it ensured almost no unemployment, and the shift to a market system led to a change in the employment situation. Many enterprises went out of business and factories and plants were closed, which created unemployed workers. ...read more.


Wage inequalities increased the gap between wealth differences. Also, as a market economy rewards those with higher levels of human capital, when in the past coal miners were paid more than doctors were, in a mixed economy this switched around. The transition period lasted different lengths of time for different countries. Where some countries, such as the Ukraine, failed to transform into a market economy. By 2000, the official GDP had fallen to one third of its level in 1989. Government provided services such as education and healthcare are under-funded, as the tax base is very low. Since 1990, all those people who rely on the state for their income, such as doctors and pensioners, have seen a fall in their real income. Criminal activity has been encouraged and investment has been discouraged due to the lack of rule of law in the economic sphere. Therefore, long term growth prospects do not look promising in the Ukraine. In general, Eastern European countries have managed their transitions relatively well, and they are all aiming to join the European Union. To do this they need to match their legal systems with the rest of the EU law and need to have stable currency along with low inflation. As we can see, there have been many effects of the transition away from central planning in Eastern Europe. There have been effects on output, unemployment, inflation, ownership and wealth, the distribution of resources and government finances. In most cases these have not been positive changes to begin with but have over time improved and now have a better prospective for the future economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    This paper attempts to compare the two markets to find out if there are cross-liquidity affects and then attempts to seek out which variables affect liquidity of the bonds in each market. This will then enable an analysis as to whether the two markets are inextricably linked via liquidity and

  2. Assess the relative merits and demerits of a market economy. Why have each East ...

    Profits are extremely important in a market economy. They act as a signal for what is to be produced. If firms are earning abnormal profits then it is signal that consumers wish to buy more of that product and vice versa.

  1. Contrasting Economic Value Systems in Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard

    It is as if they live in two different worlds and belong to two different paradigms of economic thinking; they talk past one another and never truly converse. Lopakhin sees the practicality of the business plan, which would secure the Ranevskys a good and stable source of income, and at the same time, sustained ownership of the property.

  2. Recession, Tax Cuts and Budget Deficits.

    Then in 2001, with the economy slumping into recession, the new president postulated that the tax cut was just the stimulus the economy needed.7 The income that went to taxes could not be invested, so giving more income back to the income earners should spur investment and provide a fresh supply of capital into the economy.

  1. The Japanese Occupation - Concept of Great East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere

    Occupation also provoked competition for power within individual communities. However, conflict was less the result of deliberate policy on the part of the Japanese. Conflict was in fact the outcome of economic hardships, changes in political patronage, the erosion of local government and the sheer mutual mistrust of those who

  2. Living Wage

    The first opposition is that paying a living wage will cause inflation and inhibit economic growth. Higher wages may actually help firms reduce turnover and fill vacancies, according to some economists, and can also lead to greater worker productivity by improving morale and overall job satisfaction.

  1. This report will establish the opportunities and threats presented to Sony by the EU ...

    Advertising is more expensive because you don't know the needs of the USA populace, which means extra costs incurred by Sony. But the fact that the EU population is greater than that of the USA by over 100 million is major factor because there will less demand for Sony's products because there are lesser people.

  2. Discuss the extent to which the economic theories in the Market's Reader can be ...

    income, lifestyle, age, and the social conventions and expectations) third model; F.A. Hayek is representing the third theoretical perspective of the competitive market. He admire the basic idea of the Neoclassical model (perfect competition) pointing out its main weakness; lack of emphasis on the process of competitive price information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work