• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What justification isthere for the introduction of the National Minimum Wage?

Extracts from this document...


Usamah Chaudhary Paper 4, Topic 4 26th November 2004 Magdalene College What justification is there for the introduction of the National Minimum Wage? The concept of a National Minimum Wage (NMW) was first introduced in the political arena by the Labour Party in their election manifesto in 1992, with the first comprehensive NMW being introduced in April 1999 at 3.60 per hour for workers over the age of 21. The Conservative Party has subsequently endorsed the NMW and thus the NMW has not been a source of major political dispute; however, it is still worth considering the initial justification for the introduction of the NMW in the light of British experience. This analysis will consider arguments specific to the British economy at the time rather than the general benefits of a minimum wage. The first major factor is that of earnings inequality. This widened persistently over the 1980s and 90s, mostly due to a rise in the gap between the top and the median of the earnings distribution as well between the median and the bottom of the earning distribution. Wider wage differentials led to greater inequality in income distribution; in 1995, the highest-paid 10 percent of employees in a profession were, on average, earning up to 3.6 times as much as the lowest-paid 10 percent of employees in the same profession. ...read more.


On the other hand, increased wages may well result in increased work effort on the part of the employee; thus it is true that in the long run a minimum wage will shift labour to more efficient operations. A fourth point to note is that some form of regulation was crucial in the UK to prevent 'sweating' (whereby workers are paid below subsistence levels) and other forms of worker exploitation. Although it may be argued that workers were left open to such exploitation only when Wages Councils were abolished by the Major government in 1993, the truth is that Wages Councils were never as effective as they should have been anyway. Besides consistently setting too low rates of pay, Wages Councils were not universal in impact, setting minimum rates only for specific industries where low pay dominated and leaving out industries where some form of collective bargaining, however ineffective, existed. This did nothing for low-paid workers and firms that could not participate in collective bargaining due to poor bargaining structures in the excluded industries; it also excluded smaller industries where low pay was known to exist. In addition, union collective bargaining was often ineffective and by the 1980s it was evident that collective bargaining alone could not resolve the problem of low pay. Coupled with this was the policy of labour market deregulation pursued by the Conservative governments throughout the 80s and early 90s. ...read more.


The government may have felt that setting a minimum wage would shift the burden of maintaining minimum income levels off itself (albeit onto employers' pay bill). The NMW thus underpinned the benefits system by setting a minimum level of income; this, in turn, led to increased tax revenue for the government. Another reason for implementing a minimum wage is that it reduces the burden of unemployment benefit on the government. Assuming marginal tax rates for low-paid workers aren't too high, a higher guaranteed minimum level of pay would create incentives for workers to join the labour force, resulting in less people claiming unemployment benefits. In addition, more workers would offer their labour and thus the cost of recruitment, especially for high labour turnover low-paying jobs, would decrease. Thus further justification for the NMW is the reduction of the financial burden on the government through increased participation in the labour market, increased tax revenues and less expenditure on in-work benefits. Thus the NMW was justified on a number of points, ranging from the protection of low paid workers to reducing income inequality to increasing work incentives in the economy. Given the numerous benefits arising from the NMW's introduction and the fact that thus far there have not been any significant knock-on effects on pay differentials or employment, one may conclude that the introduction of the National Minimum Wage was entirely justified. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Advantages and disadvantages of minimum wage.

    In the long term, it ensures that they can afford better basic, medical and educational facilities. This has an effect on the productivity of the nation's labor force. Not only does the minimum wage ensure that workers are paid enough to afford facilities to sustain better standards of living but

  2. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    Thus, all regressors are important to the construction of the model. The model is then tested to determine how many cointegration vectors exist, in order to do this the Johansen reduced rank regression approach is used (Johansen 1988) and the trace test is applied.

  1. Why does Britain need a Minimum wage

    Cost Push Inflation: To cope with this increase in their cost of production, some firms may pass this higher wage rate to the prices of their goods leading to inflation. 3)

  2. Victoria Junior College

    The Bretton Woods structures, instituted by the US, could not find another country which was able to back it up - indeed, only the US could have done so because the Bretton Woods system was tailored to its model of a post-war economy.

  1. Measurement of National Income, Strengths and Weaknesses of National Income Statistics.

    Only final goods are included when measuring national income. If intermediate goods were included too, this would lead to double counting; for example, the value of the tires would be counted once when they are sold to the car manufacturer, and again when the car is sold to the consumer.

  2. The National Debt

    Reagan did not receive the support afforded to past Democratic presidencies in the House of Representatives. For six of his eight years, Reagan had support from a Republican Senate but had to contend with a Democratic House of Representatives. Reagan attempted to pass the Financial Responsibility Act of 1982, which

  1. Living Wage

    and Western Europe. The U.S. alone lost 3 million jobs in the last two and a half years, and it is predicted that 3.3 million more will be outsourced especially to India. U.S. president George Bush is promoting laws that forbid off-shoring starting with a bill that forbids federal governments from moving jobs overseas.

  2. Environmental Analysis Of Landis Lund.

    Pure capitalism is only an economic theory and doesn't actually exist in real life. 2.1.1 Capitalism Also known as Free Market, in this market money is king, both to the consumer and to the supplier.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work