• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Why did industrialisation depend on agriculture in the USSR?"

Extracts from this document...


1. "Why did industrialisation depend on agriculture in the USSR?" Industrialisation in the USSR relied on agriculture through the trade economy factor. To industrialise a country as huge as Russia vast financial resources needed to be utilised however Russia did not have the ready cash to cope with the demands. The middle classes had collapsed so borrowing money from them was not an option, borrowing money from abroad would be too controversial, many of the countries disliked and distrusted the advancing communist regime. Russia also had neither the technological capabilities within the factories to produce goods for the international market, also the goods Russia could produce were far below the standard of the western powers. The only trade-able and ready product was grain. Russia had a majority population of peasants, so the people producing a surplus creates a marketable commodity. ...read more.


Preobrazenky's diagram is far simpler in construction than that of Bukharin. He gives no leeway to the peasants at all, they are derived as commodities am are to be exploited under the more commited communists. Bukharin however details peasants recieving fair payment for grain, a fair market to purchase goods and savings, and investments. All government, industry and peasants have equal chance to make a profit and to have possibility of rising up in stature and status. Preobrazensky's ideas are far more rigid and more state/communist based where-as bukharin's waver on the edge of capitalism. Preobrazensky's theory utilises "state trade monopoly" and is a quicker way of achieving trade results. 4. "why do you think the leading communists had little time for peasants?" leading and influential communists had little time for peasants and the kulaks for a variety of reasons. ...read more.


Stalins "Great turn" and its introduction af the 5 year plans (5yp's) would have a huge economic and social effect on the country. The N.E.P was failing: there was widespread unemployment among the workers, factories and industry had reached their saturation point of productivity and food was expensive in comparison to earnings. In the last "normal" year before the revolution Russia exported 12 million tonnes of grain however, under the N.E.P it was never more than 3 million. Under stalins new economic policy (an interpreatation of preobrazenky's theory) the country would undergo rapid industrialisation, trade would increase. State control would become essential therefore creating a far more efficient productivity margin. Stalin's plans for collectivisation would also benefit a great number of the Russian populace. All peasants would be supported, all would have a house, food and stability. All workers would have a job, all workers would have a house however it would be state owned. The issue of state control would reap huge rewards for the government who would gain highly from increased profit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Causes of the Great Depression

    At the same time, many people were caught up in the stock market. In the years from 1925 to 1929 it was almost a craze to play the market. The little guy could speculate with the seasoned pros in the pit.

  2. Industrial revolution in Russia

    In a host of industries, Russia ranked fourth, for example, in steel output. Having in mind the unusual size of Russia's population - industrial production was less impressive, and it included some technologically backward sectors as well as relatively advanced heavy industry.

  1. The un-utopian issue

    This can be effective, but it may lack in resources if the firm expands such as workers. So to counter-effect this, the firms would bring in machinery, which could end up leaving a lot of workers laid-off. The machinery would indeed increase production, and if the government finds a way

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    And retailing productivity is a very important factor in determining the economy-wide productivity of a country. For example, retail trade constituted nearly one-fourth of the extra-ordinary productivity jump experienced by the USA towards the end of the last millennium. Productivity is a key factor in retailing also because of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work