• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Why did industrialisation depend on agriculture in the USSR?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. "Why did industrialisation depend on agriculture in the USSR?" Industrialisation in the USSR relied on agriculture through the trade economy factor. To industrialise a country as huge as Russia vast financial resources needed to be utilised however Russia did not have the ready cash to cope with the demands. The middle classes had collapsed so borrowing money from them was not an option, borrowing money from abroad would be too controversial, many of the countries disliked and distrusted the advancing communist regime. Russia also had neither the technological capabilities within the factories to produce goods for the international market, also the goods Russia could produce were far below the standard of the western powers. The only trade-able and ready product was grain. Russia had a majority population of peasants, so the people producing a surplus creates a marketable commodity. ...read more.

Middle

Preobrazenky's diagram is far simpler in construction than that of Bukharin. He gives no leeway to the peasants at all, they are derived as commodities am are to be exploited under the more commited communists. Bukharin however details peasants recieving fair payment for grain, a fair market to purchase goods and savings, and investments. All government, industry and peasants have equal chance to make a profit and to have possibility of rising up in stature and status. Preobrazensky's ideas are far more rigid and more state/communist based where-as bukharin's waver on the edge of capitalism. Preobrazensky's theory utilises "state trade monopoly" and is a quicker way of achieving trade results. 4. "why do you think the leading communists had little time for peasants?" leading and influential communists had little time for peasants and the kulaks for a variety of reasons. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalins "Great turn" and its introduction af the 5 year plans (5yp's) would have a huge economic and social effect on the country. The N.E.P was failing: there was widespread unemployment among the workers, factories and industry had reached their saturation point of productivity and food was expensive in comparison to earnings. In the last "normal" year before the revolution Russia exported 12 million tonnes of grain however, under the N.E.P it was never more than 3 million. Under stalins new economic policy (an interpreatation of preobrazenky's theory) the country would undergo rapid industrialisation, trade would increase. State control would become essential therefore creating a far more efficient productivity margin. Stalin's plans for collectivisation would also benefit a great number of the Russian populace. All peasants would be supported, all would have a house, food and stability. All workers would have a job, all workers would have a house however it would be state owned. The issue of state control would reap huge rewards for the government who would gain highly from increased profit. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Causes of the Great Depression

    Banks foreclosed on loans and took possession of worthless properties that nobody could afford to buy. Between 1930 and 1932 over 9000 banks failed. With all of this there Hoover announced to Americans that they should "stay the course" that the ship would right itself.

  2. The un-utopian issue

    This approach might lower the demand of the good and bring people to find alternatives, however the problem is generally there are no alternatives. So this approach tends to not go well as well. c) A planned economy would have the option of subsidizing the firms of that particular scarce product, to encourage it to grow and produce more.

  1. Mexico’s Financial Crisis.

    The banking crisis was almost multi-dimensional. There was the expansion of credit followed by improper management of this newfound freedom of credit extension and then there were the accounting discrepancies that hid the problems ensuing. A mouthful, but we shall get a little bit more in-depth.

  2. Industrial revolution in Russia

    West European industrial countries such as Germany and France, were quite aware of Russia's vast potential. The huge population, though largely peasantry and with a traditional agriculture, presented a tempting market to target. Smaller business class in Russia made the foreign presence there even more noticeable and its role in guiding industrialisation even greater.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work