Workforce management.

Authors Avatar

Annie Mackenzie – Business Management Assignment 2B

ANNIE MACKENZIE

HE ACCESS TO BUSINESS STUDIES & COMPUTING

WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT

ASSIGNMENT NO.2B

TASK ONE

Having read the article entitled ‘Dixon’s delivers the goods with first partnership deal’, it is apparent that the company has been subject to considerable change in relation to its partnership deal with the engineers’ union, the AEEU. These changes can be reviewed as follows:

Political

During the 1980’s, when the UK had a Conservative Government, attempts were made to curtail the activities of trade unions. The government’s policy was to place businesses in a position where only the most efficient would survive. The government passed a  number of ‘anti-union’ Act’s with the aim of restricting the power of trade union’s and liberating businesses from the pressure that trade unions carry. The most important of these Acts of Parliament were:

  • 1980 Employment Act
  • 1982 Employment Act
  • 1984 Trade Union Act
  • 1986 Public Order Act
  • 1988 Employment Act
  • 1989 Employment Act

Each of these Acts progressively restricted the power of trade unions to obstruct the normal course of business. Since these Acts were passed, the successive Labour Government has passed a number of Acts that regulate the rights of employees in the workplace. This not only further restricted the power of trade unions but, placed guidelines to the action that could be taken by employees who were being treated unfairly and also regulated the way in which businesses must treat their employees. These Acts were:

  • 1992 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act
  • 1993 Trade Union Reform and Employment Rights Act
  • 1996 Employment Rights Act
  • 1996 Employment Tribunals Act
  • 1998 Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act
  • 1998 Public Interest Disclosure Act
  • 1998 National Minimum Wage Act
  • 1998 Working Time Regulations
  • 1998 Human Rights Act
  • 1999 Employment Relations Act
  • 1999 Disability Rights Commission Act
  • 2000 Regulatory Investigatory Powers Act

As you can see, there have been a number of recent attempts by the government to impose certain standards that must be adhered to by employers in respect of the way employees are to be treated at work.

The collective purpose of these Acts is to provide employers and employees alike, with certain rights and to provide quick and appropriate resolutions to any disputes.

In the article, the Fairness at Work white paper is spoken of as a possible cause of Dixons new partnership deal with the engineers’ union, the AEEU. I feel that this was probably just a factor in their decision and that the deal would probably have gone ahead regardless of this. The actions of the AEEU and of Dixons are already regulated heavily by the Acts passed by Parliament and therefore, the implications of any partnership deal must comply with these Acts.

Join now!

The article also talks about ‘the direction that industrial relations is headed’. I have interpreted this as meaning that other companies within the particular industry have already, or are planning to make similar moves and, Dixons does not want to be seen as being the odd one out which may lead to negative press about the company as in the TUC report, Denied a Voice at Work, from the year before.

 

Economic

I think the main economic factor that Dixons have had to consider is the implications if they do not have some involvement with trade unions. As mentioned ...

This is a preview of the whole essay