• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Was Augustus A Good Leader

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine why Augustus was a good leader 11.2.09 Octavian was born in 63BCE, and was later adopted at the age of 19. After Julius Caesar died, Marcus Antonius came to power through Cleopatra (But before, Octavian's sister had married Marcus Antonius, he then cheats on he with Cleopatra). Ever since then Octavian had disliked Marcus Antonius, so when Octavian and Marcus Antonius come to power equally, they tried to make it work, though unwillingly. But soon they end up thinking that Rome is not big enough for two leaders, so they fight at The 'Sea Battle' of Actium, Octavian was the victor and gains full power over Rome. This displays good leadership because it shows that he can fight and that he was a good military leader. As soon as Octavian came to power, he said that he would hand the republic to the Senate, but never does; this demonstrated bad leadership because it shows lies and dishonour. ...read more.

Middle

This shows good leadership because it improves the life of the people. He creates the first Fire Service. This shows good leadership, because it shows that he cares about the people. He also tried to bring back religion into the Roman Society, because he was religious and he felt that it was important to be brought up with religion. He also introduced entertainment and games. His most successful games were Gladiatorial fights. These were brutal, but were huge spectator sports. This showed good and bad leadership, because while he was providing entertainment for his people, he was slaughtering his own people aswell. He soon expands the empire, by taking over Egypt, mainly because the Nile delta is fertile, and so they could grow crops, in fact it becomes so vital, that Egypt becomes his private property, this is why all other emperors ruled from Egypt. ...read more.

Conclusion

He took him under his wing and Germanicus grew into a threat towards the throne, so Lydia had him killed. He is a bad leader, because this shows how easily he can be tricked, misled, persuaded or deceived, and these are not good qualities in a leader or a country or an empire. However he was also a good leader because when he left Rome he left it in a good and stable position, he created 28 new colonies, he cared for people who served his country and rewarded war veterans with land, he worked extremely hard for himself and his country, but overall he put the peoples' interest first. Overall, He was a good leader because he made Rome stable, conquered Egypt, and left Rome in a good position for the future, however he was easily misled and deceived, which is a very bad sign in a leader. Augustus was a good leader, but he had some major flaws. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Classics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Classics essays

  1. Creon’s Leadership Compared to Machiavelli’s Ideas

    But Creon does not follow the idea that "a ruler should make himself feared in such a way that...does not provoke hatred...whenever you have to kill someone, make sure you have a suitable excuse and an obvious reason..." (Machiavelli 52).

  2. Odysseus, Good Leader or Bad Leader?

    This helps him set a good example for his men to follow. In book nine he often makes reference to gods and nymphs (the children of gods).

  1. Spartan Army’s Code of Honour

    B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP B AND MAP C MAP

  2. Guide To The Colosseum and Games of Ancient Rome

    The secuter would be heavily armed and always attacking, representing brute force, whereas the retiarus was lightly armed, and always retreating. It represented skill and cunning. Before a gladiator could fight, he had to submit his weapons to an official, possibly the Emperor.

  1. Who made the greatest contribution to the Athenian Constitution?

    An advantage of this was that it was very democratic, as a true democracy allows a person to rule regardless of wealth or status, but the drawback of the system was that there was always the chance that a man would take power simply because of his oratory skills and not his intellect or leadership abilities.

  2. What was life like in the Roman Army and what made them successful?

    It was a smaller sword used for thrusting instead of a long, heavy one, because a long one took too much energy to fight with and also was heavy, therefore taking more time to draw and attack successfully. A Roman gladius recovered from Colchester * Pilum- medium-length throwing spear- The pilum played a vital role in battle.

  1. Latin Coursework Roman Culture

    the spring to Sulis Minerva, combining their own Goddess Minerva (Goddess of Wisdom) with the Celtic Sulis. It was popular with both the Romans and the local Celtic community, as their beliefs had been taken into account when the Romans had built the baths.

  2. The Roman Army: Why were the Romans able to conquer and maintain such a ...

    A legion had its own engineers, accountants, carpenters, architects, doctors, clerks, smiths and armourers. These men were placed in the first cohort, along with the veterans. In some cases this was a mistake because the first cohort would be held in reserve until the effects of them being sent in would be the greatest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work