• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing the two plays 'The Crucible' and 'Little Malcolm And His Struggle Against The Eunuchs'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Part 1 I am comparing the two plays 'The Crucible' and 'Little Malcolm And His Struggle Against The Eunuchs'. Arthur Miller wrote 'The Crucible' in 1953, at the time of McCarthyism. 'Little Malcolm' was written by David Halliwell in 1964. 'The Crucible' was set before it was written; however 'Little Malcolm' was set around the time it was written. 'The Crucible' is set in 1692, Salem, Massachusetts. There is a general theme of suspicion, as the Salem witch trials were what was happening at the time, and show how the suspicion and superstition led to constant accusations and harsh punishments. This idea stemmed from the original stimulus of the McCarthy communist persecutions, as does the idea of 'naming names' to get off the hook. It was written as an allegory; Miller would not have gotten away with writing a play openly on the political affairs of the time, due to censorship laws. He himself had been in front of the 'House of Un-American Activities Committee' (H.U.A.C.), an organisation who demanded that anyone who had attended a communist meeting had to name anyone who they had seen there. This is shown when Betty and Abigail are saying 'I saw... with the Devil'. Another likeness is the strict Puritan morals of 1692, and strict American morals in 1953. The 'Aliens Act' was an issue at the time, an anti-immigrant law made by President Truman. 'Little Malcolm' was both written and set in 1964. ...read more.

Middle

This scene is quite ironic, as Malcolm calls Nipple 'deluded', 'mad', and a 'fantasist', which is clear hypocrisy; of the group, Malcolm is the least realistic, and is clearly a fantasist. In the scenes which follow, Malcolm's infatuation with Ann Gedge takes a darker turn, when he orders his cronies to beat her up with him, purely for a personal sense of power, to build up his self-esteem. As the play transpires, Malcolm's acolytes abandon him, as they are more realistic than him. He is then left alone to plot one final fruitless plan, in a desperate attempt to recover a part of his original ideas. There are quite a few similarities between the plots and characters of these plays. Both have quite dark, sinister endings; in 'The Crucible', characters like Goody Nurse and John Proctor are hanged, and in 'Little Malcolm' Ann Gedge is beaten up, and eventually Malcolm is abandoned by his co-'revolutionaries' when they see sense. A clear-cut similarity is the whole idea of the 'trial', where Malcolm is similar to Danforth in his role; he is quite a short-tempered character and is also quite a sinister character. Wick is slightly similar to Judge Hathorne, but there are few links between the characters; whereas Judge Hathorne tries to be impartial and fair, Wick is trying to prosecute Nipple, and takes a more active role in the trial. Nipple can be clearly likened to Proctor, as he is falsely accused of something; Proctor for witchcraft, Nipple for 'being in league with the Forces of World Eunarchy'. ...read more.

Conclusion

During the dialogue, I will react to things that the other characters say, looking around nervously, hunching my shoulders and keeping my head down. I will occasionally look from side to side, and keep my hands close to my chest. My eyes will also be quite wide, and my eyebrows slightly raised. During the speech, I will keep the same nervous posture but use expansive hand gestures to articulate ideas, as I am not verbally eloquent, and am struggling to remember the names of lies. After the speech, I will react with shock at Malcolm's outbursts by widening my eyes and raising my eyebrows. My lower jaw will be slightly loose, but not dropping very low like a caricature-style expression. I will be unmoving, with a 'set face' as directed in the script, until it fades out. The themes of 'The Crucible' were of fear, suspicion and paranoia. A central point was the 'naming of names'. It was written to be a realistic or naturalistic play; this means that it is designed to accurately mimic real life on the stage, rather than using symbolism. This is because of there are many props referred to in the text, and no ideas of symbolism or miming props are mentioned. In the script, there are mentions of actions such as 'knocking on doors' which are written in a way that implies that Arthur Miller wanted real wooden doors to be used on stage. Evidence such as this suggests that ideally for the playwright, this should be performed as a naturalistic play, and not as a stylistic play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Personal Performances section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Personal Performances essays

  1. In this essay I will be examining the main character in Robert Westall's 'Kingdom ...

    when Don finds Harry on the beach when Harry is trying to 'pull himself together'; 'Harry heard an explosive snort and saw a big, black, shaggy dog sitting in front of him.'

  2. GCSE Drama Coursework - Billy Liar Section One: The Response PhaseFor the response ...

    Geoffrey's upbringing and the difference in generation between them causes them rarely to see eye to eye as does Geoffrey's strong family values. Geoffrey's fiery personality and inability to express himself also plays a part in their relationship difficulties. I also think that they are very different people that have clashing personalities.

  1. Drama portfolio two

    This was one of the most important decisions made because without it we would have been performing a completely different play which would have meant different marks. I came up with the original idea for the play and the group expanded it from there.

  2. Drama Portfolio ~ Fear.

    The amount of money was hiding the risks that were also involved. So effectively I was weighing up the pros and cons, seeing if the risks out weighed the pay. I then thought that 'if I die will my family still get the money?'

  1. Clearly state what constitutes performance indicators? Why do people want organisations to produce these? ...

    Therefore with any of the indicators mentioned in part c), a doctor may find them too costly to develop. They may also find that they don't have the ability to obtain and report the data in a timely way. It could be seen how carrying out extensive surveys and questionnaires would probably not be cost effective for a general practise.

  2. Compare "Chicken" by Mark Wheeler to "Crucible"

    I think the audience would be very attached to the show because it is set in present day and love, family, friendship is very important in everyday life. The themes in The Crucible are very different to what is seen in today's day to day life.

  1. Drama Stimulus - a different state of mind such as depression and mental illnesses

    depression , I was extremely unstable; I talked about ?why I didn?t deserve this? and my hatred for the apothecary. We was asked to create a character that had been in an Victorian institution for three years , for a monologue piece to perform to the class, we also had

  2. Drama script - Doctor Who - The Lady and the Locket

    Rory: I take it you found the assassin guy? Doctor: Captain Obvious strikes again. Amy: Oi, save the sniping for later, you two, how are we going to deal with this guy? Doctor: Uuum, Rory, stay with Dana, I?ll distract him whilst Amy hits him with something from behind! Amy: Will fists work? Doctor: they?ll have to do. Go!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work