'Crossing over is an unconventional ghost story in that it doesn't adhere to traditional expectations. Explain uses of atmosphere in a variety of techniques. '

Authors Avatar

Crossing over is an unconventional ghost story in that it doesn’t adhere to traditional expectations. Explain uses of atmosphere in a variety of techniques.

Although this story is unconventional it employs many techniques found in the more conventional ghost stories, use of tension, suspense and doubt. Storr takes and develops all that is in the more conventional story, applying it in different ways to crossing over. The writer continually questions the way in which we prioritise life and also questions our own sense of reality. In an almost kierkergaardien style Storr prioritises life which is described, by overshadowing it with the characters death at the end, for example the triviality of the girls worries,( ‘she shouldn’t go back…disagreeable task,’) are indeed proven to be minor in comparison to the ‘nothingness that pervades being’. In questioning the girls reality she too questions the reality of the reader, highlighting one of our main fears, that we don’t exist,  for we realise that as the character notices that she cant distinguish between her own death and living states so too do we find it impossible to prove at any point, for certain, that we are not dreaming rather than being in a waking state. This doubt accentuates the stories negative – death, while belief in what we appear to be told chooses to ignore the negative. Only at the end of the story are our suspicions confirmed, (‘think you’re seeing a ghost?’). Constantly through the story do we doubt our own thoughts, for although we may begin to notice hints at what we believe to be true the girl seems oblivious of these and as we start to trust the girl we doubt not only the hints we think we see in the story but also our own mind. The way in which this is created is very effective as it serves to bring about doubt in what we viewed to be reality- that which we see.

Join now!

The author also manages to carry off the story by dehumanising the main character. The main character is named only as ‘she’ or the ‘girl’. This allows the transition between her living and dead states to be much more questionable as her name label has no need to be changed. It appears that we are given very little information about the girl but actually in the first page or so we begin to develop a picture of her as a shy, lonely, weak and rather unintelligent girl. (‘she wasn’t any good at making conversation,’…. ‘she wasn’t…change,’). The third person narrative ...

This is a preview of the whole essay