• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there such a thing as a 'right to life'? If so, is it an absolute right, or is it dependent upon something else?

Extracts from this document...


Is there such a thing as a 'right to life'? If so, is it an absolute right, or is it dependent upon something else? The sanctity of life is considered even without religious ethics taken into account, "It is never right to murder" is an absolutist view, but is a 'right to life' an absolutist right, to say that everything has the right to live is understandable but can it be altered with dependence on situations? John Locke gave a definition of a person "a thinking intelligent being that has reason and reflection and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing, in different times and places". ...read more.


In the case of abortion science can only give a rough estimate to when life begins; something is generally defined as being alive if it is a complex system that is self-replicating and self-determining. It is then said to be conscious if it responds to the environment appears to do so in a way that implies choice. An absolute right would be to say that murder is wrong because everyone has a right to life but the difficulty would the determination of when the personhood comes into account to which the right can be applied. Science, Joseph Fletcher and John Locke cover slightly different but wholly similar views to when personhood comes into account; Science and John Locke's definitions are more rational and with reason whereas Joseph Fletcher's is like his approach to ethics, dependable upon situations. ...read more.


As someone in a PVS or an embryo who has no value or quality of life has more of a right to life than a non-human species with personhood such as whales, dolphins or higher intelligent apes. Utilitarianism takes the view a person essentially has desires of his or her future, but as we die our desires die with us. Killing the person eliminates the happiness the victim could have had by fulfilling their desires which would not be achieving the greatest happiness. Preference utilitarianism has to take into account a victims preference to live; it is more against a person being killed than a human being. A person will have desires and preferences to live on and fulfil their desires or ambitions and therefore it is wrong to take away their right to life as these will not be satisfied. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Reviews of Personal Performances section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Reviews of Personal Performances essays

  1. "Explain the meaning of authority in relation to the public services"Authority:This can be defined ...

    All driving incidents involving police drivers in which a member of the public was killed and in some of which a member of the public was seriously injured. ? Certain serious corruption enquiries The PCA has the authority to decide whether a police officer should be put through disciplinary measures because of inadequate behaviour.

  2. Non-Verbal Communication

    Oh I say! Hands on hips Hands on hips is done to make him appear bigger and to show readiness for involvement!

  1. One thing that endures through time and change is one's brain; so perhaps the ...

    The brain is just a bodily organ, just like the heart, or an arm. Psychological similarities of two people would not signify that they are one and the same self. But then would not it be true to say that the death of the brain would signify the death of

  2. There is a problem with the way the world works right now. People do ...

    a few that will get us started, and hopefully it will snowball, over a period of time of course, but hopefully it will pick up steam and lead us into a society that places emphasis on every individual who resides in the realm of partnership.

  1. A life in the day of jhon.

    I am not the sort of person who gives in to demands pretty easily so my friends and I all keep up the noise for as long as possible or until we can't really be bothered to annoy a defenceless teacher any longer!

  2. In the movie "As good as it gets," it was very stressful for Melvin ...

    Her missing work threw his whole day off schedule. His life was a challenge so obviously it was stressful. Imminent is one of the least problems he had. Life is imminent and his life was his OCD. He couldn't escape the reality that he perceived.

  1. Mrs. Brill lived her life in a faade.

    woman with disgust but she had to think about whether she liked the way the woman acted or not.

  2. Explain the theory of virtue ethics.

    These Vices are two extremes of a scale at opposite ends, one of excess and one of deficiency. For example the vices would be shamelessness and bashfulness, and the virtue modesty. Another example of this would be boorishness and buffoonery as the two vices and the virtue as wittiness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work