Rwanda Response

Authors Avatar

Rwanda – Response Coursework

GCSE Paper 1 – Unit 1 Autumn 2007

In this topic, we looked at the genocide in Rwanda, and how it affected the many classes of people, who, for so long, had lived in harmony until the 1950’s. The two peoples, the Hutus and Tutsis, lived and worked together, forming inter-marriage ties and also helping each other out, but it all changed when the Hutus started a civil war, which led to the Rwandan genocide in the 1990’s.

The picture shown here was used as a stimulus in our lesson, and we talked about how it made us feel, and how we reacted to it. My initial response to the photograph was one of shock and horror, at the scale that the picture shows, and then of revulsion, that this was actually done, and not just imagined. Hatred and death were expressed by the skulls, for they said death by famine or murder, and even before reading the text, you knew that it was concerning mass loss of life. Once the article was read, I felt ashamed that humans were capable of this, and also mortified that the picture was only a fraction of the real scale that were killed. It helped me dig deeper inside my self to perform more emotional acting, because I knew that many thousands of people had felt the fear that my group were trying to portray through our acting.

In small groups of 4 and 5 we created a frozen image trying to portray the genocide.

In my group we decided to use levels to show the difference between those who were committing the genocide – the Hutus – and those who were being killed – the Tutsis and some Hutus who were against the killing of Tutsis. Channon and Alana stood on chairs next to each other holding hands, but Alana was facing Channon with a gun to her head, and Channon was leaning down towards me and Natalie who were on the floor being oppressed. Through Alana’s facial expression, we can see that she is angry and full of hatred, almost spurred on by the betrayal of a fellow Hutu. Her body language is ridged to show her superior status to all the others in her group. Channon’s body language is almost the same as mine, crouching down, but she is also reaching down towards me, as if to help, and her facial expressions show pity, but also fear. My body language is kneeling on the floor, looking up at Alana, who is pointing the gun at someone who is trying to help, showing my low position in the hierarchy, but also my inability to do anything about it. I use facial expression to show my hatred towards Alana, but also have to crane my neck back so that I can see her properly, again showing the levels that we incorporated into our frozen image. Natalie is lying on the floor with her head on my knee; she is in submission, and uses very submissive body language. As her hair covers her face, we cannot see any facial expression, and this portrays that she is already one of the millions killed in a seemingly pointless war. Overall, I think that our frozen image expresses both the different levels of status that were shown present throughout the genocide, but also the confusion of Hutus killing Hutus and not just Tutsis. Through facial expression, body language and levels; pity, fear, hate, anger, betrayal, submission, unity, aid, status, oppression, concern and furry are all shown, creating a web of emotions between the different people.

Join now!

 In the same groups, we created a short scene during which we had to use the drama technique – mark the moment. Incorporated into our scene were many of the emotions shown in our frozen image but brought to life. My changing body language and facial expression, as well as using emotive language and vocal expression made the piece even more potent. As well as using the mark the moment technique, we also did a split scene that merged at the end to form our piece as a whole. I used my characterisation skills to portray a young girl who ...

This is a preview of the whole essay