• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study and compare two different film interpretations of Act 4 Scene 1 of Shakespeare's 'Macbeth'. Discuss how you would replace some of the techniques the directors have chosen to use.

Extracts from this document...


MEDIA COURSEWORK- 'MACBETH' Study and compare two different film interpretations of Act 4 Scene 1 of Shakespeare's 'Macbeth'. Discuss how you would replace some of the techniques the directors have chosen to use. In this essay, I am going to compare two different interpretations of Act 4 Scene 1 of Shakespeare's 'Macbeth', to see how different directors interpret a text and use different techniques to support their ideas. The two film versions of 'Macbeth' that this essay will focus upon are 'Macbeth on the Estate' directed by Penny Woolcock and the Polanski version. Both adaptations were produced in different decades- Woolcock's being in 1997, whereas Polanski's was some twenty years beforehand. In Act 4 Scene 1, Macbeth returns to the witches and as they await his arrival, they prepare the ingredients for the spell and start chanting. Perhaps one of the most obvious differences between both films is the setting. The Polanski version is quite traditional and true to the actual play, as it is set deep in the wild moors- in a cave, unlike Woolcock's version which is very contemporary, set in a Birmingham council estate, where gang rivalry replaces monarchy. I think Polanski is quite traditional with his ideas as it agrees with the text. If I would direct this scene, I would be more original with my idea and set it in a deserted fairground, in the Hall of Mirrors. ...read more.


Also, there would be three clowns, but the reflection in the mirrors would make it look like a lot more. As well as that, the costume would be lots of muted gaudy colours like red, orange and bright blue, similar to clowns at a fairground. In order to create the desired effects both directors use different techniques. In Woolcock's version, it is set in daylight, so the colour is quite harsh and sharp. Outside of the flat, where Macbeth first starts talking to the witches, it is pale blue lighting, but in the derelict flat, it is quite dark and Woolcock has chosen to use a vibrant use of red (red walls, red lighting, red curtains.) I think this symbolises blood from the murders Macbeth has committed and I also think it symbolises hell. Also, in the den, the camera focused on sacrificial objects used in witchcraft, like a black doll (voodoo), tarot cards, candles and a helmet to symbolise war. This emphasizes the theme of evil. Also, while the witches are in the flat, the camera is unfocused and there are flashbacks, showing what Macbeth has done. In the Polanski version, it is set in the early evening and there is a blue, hazy light tint around the surrounding hills, but near the cave mouth, there is a orange/ red tinge and a bit of smoke and flickering light, which signifies the warmth of the cauldron in the cave. ...read more.


There is also a 'bleeping' sound. All of these add to the dramatic effect. Woolcock has chosen to make many text cuts in this scene, whereas Polanski has stayed with the original text, making very few cuts. Macbeth is famous for its spell and the words "Double, double, toil and trouble" are well known, so to cut it out as Woolcock has done is quite daring, as it is difficult to replace the cauldron and the spell, with something else symbolic and the effect can be lost, as I think is the case in 'Macbeth on the Estate'. Even though the absence of words is replaced by images, the actual impact this has on you is not that great, compared to the Polanski version where the spell is kept, and to add to the effect of it, it shows the witches adding the very gruesome and disgusting looking ingredients into the cauldron. I also think that the actual cauldron contributes to the fact that they are witches and witches cast spells. Overall, I think that both film interpretations are excellent in their own ways, but I think that the Polanski version is more effective than the Woolcock version, as it really brings the witches and the conjuration alive, and because the spell is taken quite literally, being able to see the utterly sickening ingredients being added, makes it more enjoyable for the audience, as they feel like they are involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Macbeth section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Macbeth essays

  1. Macbeth Act 3, Scene 4.

    The set is even more sparsely decorated than it was in Polanski's version. The costumes are not different to Polanski's version. In the BBC version Macbeth and Lady Macbeth wear similar clothes to the other actors. There isn't much lighting in this version.

  2. The Witches are an integral part of Macbeth. Discuss how two (or more) directors ...

    They gather on the beach floor, and this is like a supernatural gathering and gives the impression of a s´┐Żance. The Witches then leave the scene after talking, which included talks mentioning Macbeth, in which one the young Witch does not speak, the First Witch speaks her lines.

  1. Nunn and Polanski's Versions of Macbeth - comparing the two versions.

    These factors show that Polanski's use of sound effects to help the portray of his production is a lot better than what Nunn has done. Both versions use some camera work, which makes their production better to watch. Nunn uses the camera so that his actors can exit the stage with more excitement and tension.

  2. From your research into Elizabethan theatre discuss the effectiveness of Act One Scene One ...

    This is because the number three was thought to be liked with evil and demons therefore linking the characters with immorality. Just in case the congregation didn't respond to this number Shakespeare linked them with other words which would have been associated with demonology.

  1. Study three dramatised interpretations of Macbeth

    It is more to the right hand side of the screen. The next image we see is the witches' hands going into the boiling cauldron and then they pull out a lump of clay. They rip it apart to reveal the figure of a baby.

  2. Macbeth - Polanski’s version and Bogdanov’s version

    In Bogdanov's version, there is very little supernatural behaviour. The scene is fairly modern. The scene is set on a wasteland with only three witches this time. By sticking to three witches, Bogdanov's version is true to the original, which is an important factor in deciding whether a film is good or not.

  1. MACBETH Act 4 Scence 1

    The scene contrasts with the scene directly before and after. The scene before Lennox is talking about Macbeth and his suspicion of him. The one directly after Macbeth plots to kill Macduff's family. These two scenes represent the real world, which contrasts with act 4, scene 1 which in a way is a supernatural world, and does not seem real.

  2. Film Version of Macbeth Act 3, Scene 4 (the Banquet Scene).

    I think this is a good idea because it makes the scene more exciting with the action coming thick and fast because of it. The actual acting of the main roles in this version was disappointing. At the beginning of the scene, when he receives the news about Banquo, John Finch sounds too relaxed and the murderers sound too worried.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work