‘An Inspector Calls’ has been described as a play of social criticism. What is being criticised?

Authors Avatar

Roopa Modi                Page  of

‘An Inspector Calls’ has been described

as a play of social criticism.  

What is being criticised?

An Inspector Calls’ is a play written in 1942 about a retrospective time just before the First World War.   This was at a time in history when the industrialists had extensive power, and the working classes were destitute and disadvantaged.   Through the play, Priestly sends a political message about society, criticising many things.

The play begins with the Birlings’ celebrating the engagement of their daughter, Sheila, to Gerald Croft, a wealthy, well bred young man.   The Birlings’ appear to be a reasonably happy family but they are so wrapped up in themselves that they fail to notice that anything that is going on around them until an inspector calls.   Inspector Goole cleverly visits the family while they are celebrating the engagement in high spirits.   This could signify that the upper classes are too busy having a good time and not thinking about the rest of the world, that they have to be brought back to reality by something ‘horrible’ happening; in this case, the death of Eva Smith, a working-class girl.   This demonstrates that Priestly is criticising the upper classes for being too wrapped up in themselves to care about other people.

One of the most obvious things that Priestly criticises is that everyone wants to pass responsibility onto other people, mirrored by the Birlings’ all passing the blame for Eva’s death onto someone else when they are questioned.   They all did things without thinking, but later regretted it.   The first person to start off Eva Smith’s cycle of misfortune was Mr. Birling, who sacked Eva from her job at his factory because she lead a group of girls to ask for a pay rise.   Mr. Birling told the Inspector, ‘Eva Smith was one of them.   She’d had a lot to say – far too much – so she had to go.’ This shows how expendable Mr Birling thinks his workers are, and so he uses his powers to do his ‘duty’ and get rid of the workers that cause trouble.   Mr. Birling’s attitude demonstrates perfectly how selfish, and unsympathetic people are.   Although he has more than enough money, Mr. Birling still tries to keep the running costs of the factory down and obviously doesn’t place much value on people.   They wanted a good life and were selfish by trying to keep money in the family.   Priestly criticises this aspect of human nature; that people ‘can’t accept any responsibility’ for other people, or for their own mistakes.   Although Mr Birling says that he can’t accept responsibility, he seems to know that it is perfectly possible that he does hold some responsibility.   He says,  ‘If we were all responsible for everything that happened to everybody we’d had anything to do with, it would be very awkward.’

Join now!

After being sacked, Eva had found a job at Milwards, but also got fired from there after an encounter with Mr. Birling’s daughter; Sheila.   She was irrationally jealous of how pretty Eva was, and complained to the manager, saying that Eva had been rude to her.   She acted in a very childish manner and she had not thought of the consequences of her actions, regretting it later.   Sheila was able to get Eva sacked because of her position in society, whereas Eva, who was of a lower class than Sheila, was not able to stand up ...

This is a preview of the whole essay