• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

A comparative study of jack in ‘Lord of the Flies’ and Heathcliff in ‘Wuthering Heights’ and the conflict they represent between ‘civilised’ and ‘savage’ behaviour.

Extracts from this document...


A comparative study of jack in 'Lord of the Flies' and Heathcliff in 'Wuthering Heights' and the conflict they represent between 'civilised' and 'savage' behaviour. In this essay I will be focusing on the two different novels, 'Lord of the Flies' by William Golding and 'Wuthering Heights' by Emily Br�nte. I will concentrate on Jack in 'Lord of the Flies' and his constant conflict over leadership on the island, and Heathcliff in 'Wuthering Heights' and his conflict with Edgar Linton regarding Catherine Earnshaw. I will show how the two authors use different procedures to express the emotional and behavioural differences between savage and civilised behaviour. The two novels are very different in the way in which narration, viewpoint, language and the detail of the description is used. Much of 'Wuthering Heights' is a long flash back told by Nellie Dean, the former housekeeper to Mr Lockwood a tenant at Thrushcross grange. The text is extremely descriptive but also consists of Nellie Dean's opinions and memories along with a few extracts form Catherine Earnshaw's diary. The novel contains more traditional language 'They both promised... to grow up rude as savages, the young master being entirely negligent how they behaved and what they did so they kept clear of him.' Throughout the novel there is little speech used. When speech is used it consists of a variety of dialects, Standard English is used in conversations/comments by most of the characters. With Joseph being the acception and speaking Scottish, 'Maister, coom Hither! Miss Cathy's riven Th' back off Th' Helmeth uh Salvation un' Heathcliff's pawsed his fit intuh t' first part uh T' Broadway to destruction!' This adds a bit of variety to the novel as it shows how different people from different parts of the country react to events. 'Lord of the Flies' uses more modern English 'Piggy said nothing but nodded, solemnly. They continued to sit, gazing with impaired sight at the chief's seat and the glittering lagoon.' ...read more.


It is also shown how Jack's physical violence is initially kept pent up inside him but eventually releases itself onto piggy 'This from piggy and wails of agreement from some of the hunters drove Jack to violence. The bolting look came into his blue eyes. He took a step and able at last to hit someone stuck his fist into piggy's stomach.' This again shows his dislike for piggy and shows how uncivilised and savage he in fact is. Both Jack and Heathcliff act violently but they release their aggression differently, Heathcliff tends to be clever with the way in which he acts and bribes, although he suggests that he could indeed handle releasing his aggression physically he doesn't he sticks to what he knows best and shows a more mature attitude towards it. Jack on the other hand shows a more immature way of handling it; he uses both physical and verbal violence. The way in which he uses his words to try and harm others is different, and entails no maturity at all, he uses more childish thoughtless words, he may well use physical violence because he realises that his immature way of handling words is not making much of an effect. Heathcliff's aggression becomes focused on Edgar Linton; this is because Heathcliff is jealous of the relationship Edgar has with Catherine. To show Heathcliff's wildness and to develop the civilisation versus savagery theme Br�nte uses a different kind of language, a more intense harsh range of vocabulary. She uses words such as 'with frightful vehemence' to prove that Heathcliff feels really deeply and means what he says, she shows him to be impatient, agitated and angry; 'stamping his foot and groaning in a sudden paroxysm.' This is another example of Heathcliff's aggression being focused on Edgar Linton; '"Cathy, this lamb of yours threatens like a bull!" he said. "It is in danger of splitting its skull against my knuckles. ...read more.


However he does have positive sides; the fact that he cares for others so much that he would change for them, and the fact that when he is angry he does not always release it on others but in fact will runaway to the moors to calm down; 'he had listened till he heard Catherine say it would degrade her to marry him, and then he stayed no farther.' Catherine, Nelly and Mr Earnshaw all loved Heathcliff greatly and this also suggests that in fact he must have good sides to him or else's they would not have loved him so, much. Jack also inspires strong emotions, however they are different from those of Heathcliff. Jack inspires fear and admiration. Admiration must be one of the biggest as Ralph admires him and they normally fight, argue and show constant dislike towards each other. Golding allows jack to apologise to piggy after stealing his glasses this raises admiration form the reader as well as other characters in the book. Jack is intimidating, this makes him feel like he has power over others which is what he wants; however this makes people dislike him, but they continue to follow him because they fear him; '"who wants Jack for chief?" with dreary obedience the choir raised their hands.' 'Dreary' emphasises the fact that the choir dislike Jack and don't want to vote for him but do so because they fear him. Both boys shower others with strong emotions. Jack creates mainly negative feelings, or gains positive feedback from others after having previously doing something negative and then correcting it. Heathcliff creates equal positive and negative feelings. In writing this essay I have noticed many similarities in Heathcliff and Jack despite the very different context of the novels. I prefer Golding's style of writing as it gives a better description of the characters and the surroundings and more in sight into the story. However as the characters I prefer Heathcliff to Jack as the way in which he acts and responds to events are more understandable whereas Jack is full of evil. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE William Golding section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE William Golding essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How has the relationship between Ralph and Jack changed?

    3 star(s)

    Ralph has never been on a hunt before, and he quickly becomes caught up in the joy of the chase. He throws his spear at the boar. It glances off the animal's snout, but Ralph is thrilled with his marksmanship.

  2. Themes, Motifs, and Symbols - Themes are the fundamental concepts addressed and explored in ...

    Simon's rapport with the jungle combined with his behavior throughout the novel therefore makes him the only character not to feel morality as an artificial imposition of society but as a way of life proceeding directly and easily from nature.

  1. What are the Differences between what Jack and Ralph stand for and in how ...

    Were going to hunts pigs to get meat for everybody,' showing his craving yet again for hunting, but also using the beastie to manipulate the littl'uns into believing Jack will protect them. But Ralph says, 'But there isn't a Beastie!'

  2. Analysis of Lord of the Flies.

    He decides to call a meeting to attempt to bring the group back into line. Late in the evening, he blows the conch shell, and the boys gather on the beach At the meeting place, Ralph grips the conch shell and berates the boys for their failure to uphold the group's rules.

  1. What Personality?

    The reason he was so loyal to Ralph was because he saw life on the island the same way, as and interim home. Ralph never knew how loyal piggy was until it was too late. He realized that he wasn't strong enough by himself and that he never would have made it without piggy.

  2. Both Lord of the Flies and Frankenstein explore the factors of nature and nurture ...

    Although it was wrong for him to enter the old mans cottage and steal food, he is unaware of this and means no harm. This is the point where our sympathies completely shift from victor to the monster, it is clear that the monster is a victim of society and his own abandonment.

  1. What Have you Learned about the Qualities Of a successful Leader, from your study ...

    two main things in his life revolve around rules and him being in charge with the ability to rule over others. His choir enters in a Black uniform the significance of this uniform is seen asan act of discipline rather than the religious symbolism, this is ominous.

  2. A media study comparing two cinematic interpretations of Golding's Lord of the Flies: the ...

    I think that the director of this movie has decided to put the war images in not only to alert the viewers war is closer, but to remind the spectators of World War II where evacuation also took place and people were taken to the other side of the world

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work