• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A comparative study of the role of children and the presentation of the experiences in fiction as illustrated in Susan Hill's 'I'm the King of the Castle' and L.P Hartley's 'The Go-Between'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A comparative study of the role of children and the presentation of the experiences in fiction as illustrated in Susan Hill's 'I'm the King of the Castle' and L.P Hartley's 'The Go-Between'. 'The world of the child is often one of intense emotion, confusion, pain and suffering and is a rich source of material for the novelist' Having only been alive for about twelve years, the lead characters of I'm the King of the Castle and The Go-Between are inexperienced. The 'intense emotion, confusion, pain and suffering' that a child would go through is caused by this. Adults have the advantage over children. They have faced these things before and got through them; the knowledge and experience from childhood that they use to get through bad times as adults is what helps them. Not having such weapons, children react very differently. I'm the King of the Castle has a prime example of a boy, Charles Kingshaw, being bullied and not knowing what to do; as this had not happened before, he does not have the experience. Leo, the main character of The Go-Between, is an example of how a pursuit of knowledge can harm a na�ve, inexperienced boy. A novel with children in these situations can be very emotional and is thus 'a rich source of material for the novelist'. ...read more.

Middle

The only person Kingshaw had was his Mother and, in an effort to fit in, his mother sided with Hooper over Kingshaw in most situations even though Kingshaw was innocent. '"Charles, how can you speak like that, how can you be so naughty?" "I didn't touch him." "Then why ever should Edmund say that you did? I am quite sure he would have no reason to tell an untruth." "Oh yes, he would, he's a sneaky little liar, he'd say anything. Well I didn't touch him." "Oh, what a way to speak! You make me so ashamed of you."' In The Go-Between it was the adults, the supposed carers, who were doing the bullying. In a way, it was similar to I'm the King of the Castle, as it was not only Hopper bullying Kingshaw, but the adults, too, bullying them into being friends and siding with Hooper. The similarity in the way the boys relate, Leo and Marcus in The Go-Between and Kingshaw and Hooper in I'm the King of the Castle, is also different. Both pairs of friends are fighting physically and verbally. However in the case of Marcus and Leo it is in jest; it is the way they relate as friends, although they are almost rivals. 'Often when we talked there was a spirit of verbal rivalry between us; we trod the knife-edge between affection and falling out;' Yet ...read more.

Conclusion

In our society, a twelve year old boy would have no difficulty in coming to the conclusion that these secret 'business' notes were in fact love letters but in the 1900s there was no media or social acceptance of discussing personal relationships. 'Totally ignorant as I was of love affairs, and little as I knew about their conventions, I felt sure that when a girl was engaged to a man she did not write letters to another man calling him 'darling'. She might do it up until the day of engagement, but not after. It was automatic; it was a rule: like leaving the wicket at cricket when you were out; and it scarcely crossed my mind that to comply with it might be painful.' However the idea that a twelve year old boy might kill himself as a result of bullying is more believable as this still happens in today's society as it did in the 1950s. Both books have a suicide at the end though in I'm the King of the Castle it was the bullied and in The Go-Between it was the bully. Though these books hold some similarities they are also quite different. Though they both present the children in the same way, having similar personalities and experiences, they present those experiences differently. The role of these children also differs; Kingshaw is seen as a victim, and, though Leo is a victim too, in some ways he is almost considered the hero of the novel. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Susan Hill section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Susan Hill essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How does Susan Hill use Gothic techniques to create tension and horror in the ...

    5 star(s)

    Susan Hill also uses associations from Kipps' past to add depth to the story. This can be seen when the narrator states that the sound appears to: '...waken old, half-forgotten memories.' The noise is seemingly familiar to Kipps. It brings him back to his childhood, and almost hypnotizes him.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "I'm the King of the Castle" - with close references to the text discuss ...

    3 star(s)

    This is done right throughout the book. In Chapter VI, Hooper talks about Kingshaw's mother , as a servant to Hooper's father, that Kingshaw is simply the son of someone who works for his father. He even says "she [Kingshaw's mother] has to do what my father says, and that means you have to do what I

  1. Can Hooper be seen as anything other than Evil? A comparative Essay on 'I'm ...

    The setting might affect Hopper by giving him an impression that he knows the area and that he controls, for example in his father's house. The language used to create the atmosphere is extremely descriptive and interesting. Susan Hill also gives you the views on the other characters views on

  2. What technique does Susan Hill use to create tension in I'm the King of ...

    The readers were only allowed to know what that "thing" was when Kingshaw turns on his bedroom light and sees the stuffed crow. Due to the lack of knowledge and understanding about Hooper, readers tend to share Kingshaw's confusion and fears about the mysterious Hooper.

  1. Consider the theme of loneliness in the novel "I am the king of the ...

    Initially he has some courage and after Hooper chalanges him by saying "Why have you come here?" and he "stands up his ground" by not speaking at all. Susan Hill introduces him as a very susceptible character. As he is defenseless, one of the first times Hooper threatens him, he

  2. Discuss the significance of the title "I'm The King Of The Castle".

    fear them, on the other hand Hooper feels he is the King inside the house and is reduced to a helpless baby when he leaves his "fortress". But when Kingshaw was walking in the cornfields a crow came and swooped down at him he was so scared he ran out of the field and ran straight home back to Warings.

  1. Compare and contrast the presentation of Charles Kingshaw and Edmund Hooper in I'm the ...

    The narrator in The Half Brothers is spoilt like Edmund and considers himself to be far better than his half brother as this is what he has been brought up to believe. He says '[He] sometimes repeated the disparaging words [he] heard others use with regard to him, without fully understanding their meaning.'

  2. I'm The King Of The Castle, by Susan Hill - Who Is Responsible For ...

    He puts the message ' fearfully' in his pocket and as the reader we become aware that Hooper already has a domineering power over Kingshaw even though the two boys have never met before. Hooper demonstrates to us right from the start that Warings is his.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work