A Comparison between the two versions of Romeo and Juliet, focusing on Characters, Themes and Technical Presentations

Authors Avatar

A Comparison between the two versions of Romeo and Juliet, focusing on Characters, Themes and Technical Presentations

The two versions offer enjoyable viewing. At the same time they are at variance in specific areas and these are discussed in this project. The two directors are Baz Luhrmann, an Australian who embarks on a modern theme targeting young people. Franco Zeffirelli, an Italian film director presents his version in at an older audience with the appropriate settings.

I would like to discuss some key points that demonstrate the interpretations presented by the two directors:  

Luhrmann identifies his characters with a modern setting and even the fight scenes use modern weapons and familiar locations. This enables the viewer to identify the characters; the Capulets appear in western-style dress whilst the Montagues are in a surfer style outfit. In comparison Zeffirelli presents his scenes in a traditional olden style market place. The Montagues appear in uniform type clothing typical of olden times. Luhrmann, on the other hand presents his characters and scenes in a modern environment.    

I observed many factors that made both versions so totally different. For example, Luhrmann uses contrasting lighting in his presentations and the amount of colour is extraordinary. He begins by using simple techniques with the aid of a television in a dark room. The fighting scenes are very effective depicting variation in lighting which is quite striking. There is black and white scripting proceeded by a woman news reader who directs the attention of the audience to the action that will take place. This is aided by effective sound such as the type of music, from rock to wild-western. According to the different characters that are being introduced. For example, Benvolio appears loud and funny whilst Tybalt is quiet and serious.

Join now!

Zeffirelli uses crowded market scenes but the dialogue of the characters appears loud and clear. This is in contrast to Luhrmann’s approach where the atmosphere appears quiet and not as loud as the Luhrmann version.  Zeffirelli uses natural light from the sun, as most of the scenes were shot outdoors.

As Zeffirelli did not employ cutting or zooming techniques, as in the case of the Luhrmann’s version. It was presented in a natural sense by focusing on the locals which were film extras. This comes across effectively and creates a good impact.  

Luhrmann on the other ...

This is a preview of the whole essay