A Comparison of how "To His Coy Mistress" and "The Flea" Present and Develop the Poets' Arguments

Authors Avatar

Ben Dewsnip           19th May 08    10co  

A Comparison of how “To His Coy Mistress” and “The Flea” Present and Develop the Poets’ Arguments

The poems “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell and “The Flea” by John Donne are both written with the same idea in mind, for the authors to get their ‘women’ or mistresses to be less shy with them. This was a common idea of which poems were based in Marvell’s and Donne’s time due to when a pretty woman was to find herself interacting with a man, it was conventional for her to be shy or unwilling, or at least for a small time at first. With this in mind it is easy to see that both poems include the idea of “carpe diem”, this means “seize the day”, in other words make use of the time we have and do not let it go to waste. This was common in the poems written by the metaphysical poets, which both Donne and Marvell were included in.

The most obvious comparison of arguments is what the persona is trying to get from his mistress, it is clear that all that the persona has on his mind in “The Flea” is sexual intercourse, yet in "To His Coy Mistress" the persona is more interested in love in general not just sex. These arguments set an almost funny theme of the personas persuading their mistress’s. There is also a sense of desperation in "The Flea" because the persona knows that if the flea is squashed that his chances of having sex with his mistress are also squashed. As well as the sense of desperation in "The Flea", it is also very humorous. It satirises how the persona cannot get his mistress to have sex with her but she is willing to give up her virginity to something as insignificant as a flea.  The poet’s argument in "The Flea" is that the flea, an insignificant object, bit his mistress after biting him, therefore mixing their two bloods together, this is Donne’s time was considered as forming a bond, the mixing of their bloods bonded the couple together almost like marriage :

It suck’d me first, and now sucks thee,

And in this flea, our two bloods mingled be;

This frustrates the persona because the flea has done what his mistress has resisted against performing with him; this shyness is also what Marvell’s argument is based on. The persona in "To His Coy Mistress" shows a sense of irritation that his mistress is so coy. The main idea of  the poem is that if the persona and his mistress had time then her coyness would be acceptable  but they don’t have all the time in the world, so must therefore make use of what time they have, the phrase “carpe diem” is used to describe this. Marvell wrote “To His Coy Mistress” in three stages. The first stanza talks about if they had all the time in the world, “An hundred years should go to praise” is an example of the persona stating what they could do if they had an eternity, then his mistress’s coyness wouldn’t be a problem, the second stanza then brings them back into reality and brings the idea that they don’t have all the time in the world into the readers mind:

But at my back I always hear

Time’s winged chariot hurrying near;

Join now!

And yonder all before us lie

This is describing how time, in other words ultimately Death, is racing towards them and that they don’t have long until they will be dead, lying on the ground. It’s an interesting use of personification, giving the chariot wings, this creates an image of a chariot of time flying towards them, coming down to get them, in other words take their lives. The final stanza suggests what they should or could be doing now to rectify the problem of coyness:

Now let us sport while we may,

And now, like amorous birds ...

This is a preview of the whole essay