A Comparison of the Prejudice which the Heroines Suffer in Rebecca and Pride and Prejudice.

Authors Avatar

Louise Shirley 11/5

A Comparison of the Prejudice which the Heroines Suffer

in Rebecca and Pride and Prejudice.

Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice was published in 1813 and Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca in 1938. In both novels, the heroines are faced with a great deal of prejudice and discrimination. In Pride and Prejudice this heroine is the spirited Elizabeth Bennet, one of five daughters in an upper-middle class family. The heroine in Rebecca is the narrator, a diffident young woman from a lower-middle class background who begins the novel as a paid companion before becoming the second Mrs de Winter.

Both Elizabeth Bennet in Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and the second Mrs.de Winter of du Maurier’s Rebecca suffer prejudice as a consequence of their situation. Their sex and position in society force them to be dependent on others. In both novels the author uses the heroine to demonstrate the importance of class, and how very strictly the lines of class were drawn. The second Mrs de Winter is (initially) the paid companion of Mrs Van Hopper, and is at her service. She is an orphan of little social significance or identity: the fact that her name is never revealed to the reader is symbolic of this. Women are shown to be considered less important than their male counterparts- Elizabeth comes from a family of five daughters and so, when Mr. Bennet dies, their home is to be inherited by Mr.Collins. Although the Bennets, who are middle class, are able to socialize with the upper class Darcys and Bingleys, their social inferiority is obvious and they are treated accordingly. Austen satirizes this kind of class consciousness, particularly in the character of Mr. Collins, ‘a mixture of pride and obsequiousness’ who fawns to the upper class Lady Catherine de Bourgh. Mr. Collins's views are the most excessive and obvious but his perception of the importance of class is shared by Miss Bingley, who we are told is ‘of a respectable family in the north of England, a circumstance more deeply impressed in their memories than that their brother's fortune and their own had been acquired by trade.' It is ironic that although she criticises Elizabeth for her uncle’s position, her own familys’ fortune was gained by trade. This shows how snobbish people could be. Mr. Darcy has a strong belief in the dignity of his lineage and, believing the people of Meryton to be his social inferiors, refuses to condescend to dancing with Elizabeth, who he believes is ‘not handsome enough’ for him. His sense of social supremacy is exposed by this remark. In Rebecca, the second Mrs de Winter is herself very aware of the fixed class distinctions, and is ‘shocked’ and ‘bewildered’ at upper-class Maxim’s proposal to her because she believes she does not ‘belong to (his) sort of world’.      

Join now!

In both novels, the heroines find themselves discriminated against because of their social class, something which in the late eighteenth / early nineteenth century was considered to be of utmost importance. Mrs Van Hopper ensures that the second Mrs de Winter knows her place as a mere servant- the second Mrs de Winter ‘trails in the wake’ of her. Mrs Van Hopper ridicules the second Mrs de Winter as soon as she learns of her engagement to Maxim, commenting that she cannot see the second Mrs de Winter being successful as the mistress of Manderley. She suggests that Maxim has ...

This is a preview of the whole essay