A detailed analysis of Macbeth's soliloquy to show how language illustrates change in character.

Authors Avatar

A detailed analysis of Macbeth’s soliloquy to show how language illustrates change in character.

        

This Shakespearean tragedy displays the collapse of a central protagonist, Macbeth. The enhancement of his secret ambition by the illusions and manipulative Lady Macbeth enables him to murder King Duncan, Banquo and the innocent wife and children of Macduff. Hence, his ‘overriding’ ambition leads him to break all moral boundaries. The famous ‘floating dagger’ soliloquy (2:1: 49-73) contributes to his deterioration of character by way of the hallucinations. Through a detailed analysis of language, in this soliloquy, one is able to establish Macbeth’s mental state and most importantly, his development from an ambivalent, noble man to a decisive tyrant. The end result of the ‘floating dagger’ soliloquy has an effect on the course of Macbeth’s future.  

At the start of the ‘floating dagger’ soliloquy, Macbeth has partially changed in character. Although he is no longer the brave, heroic, loyal soldier he once was, Macbeth still considers the atrociousness of the evil deed he about to commit. Shakespeare’s references to blood, ‘gouts of blood’ and ‘bloody business’, emphasizes on Macbeth’s disgust at the hasty thought of murder. ‘Gouts’ is Latin terminology implying large droplets, often gushing or bursting. Therefore, Shakespeare uses an extremely violent and vicious expression to clarify the ugliness of murder. The fact that the droplets are large signifies the enormity of Macbeth’s situation; his decision, in regard to murdering Duncan will have a considerable effect on his future.

Join now!

Hence, Macbeth is psychologically unprepared to murder an enemy without a moral justification, nevertheless, the illusions and the literal beckoning of the dagger to King Duncan’s chamber will, in due course, conquer his sense of right and wrong. Shakespeare evokes a vision, anticipating the course of Macbeth’s future; ‘Thou marshall’st me the way that I was going’. The use of the past tense specifies to the audience that Macbeth was already on the murderous path, even prior to the hallucinations of the dagger dripping with blood. Therefore, the dagger illusion is a tool of impulsion, compelling Macbeth to commit more evil ...

This is a preview of the whole essay