• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Dolls House - Is Helmer 'a monster' or do youfind sympathy for him?

Extracts from this document...


Is Helmer 'a monster' or do you find sympathy for him? Helmer is one of the central characters of A Doll's House. At the beginning of the play he is seen as the loving husband, a little patronising, but kind and caring nevertheless. However, by the end of the play our views of him have changed, he is not seen as such an admired figure. Throughout the play there are times were Helmer is a bigot and this gives you a sordid view of his character. Helmer is a typical nineteenth century respectable husband. He follows the rules society has set; this is how he has been brought up. A very stereotypical man of this patriarchal time. You cannot condemn him for this, nor can you dismiss it. He has fitted this role without consideration. Although the people of the time had the desire for social approval, Helmer takes this to the extreme and is guilty of elitism. He treats his wife as a pet "my little squander-bird" and "little squirrel" to use, but two of the many times he speaks of her as more of a possession rather than a wife a person. ...read more.


Money is a key theme throughout the play and ultimately destroys the marriage. Helmer's attitude at the end of the play shows a great deal about him and shows he is a finally monster. Nora is willing to lay down her life for Helmer, but he is unwilling to do the same for her. He does not support her at the time she needs it most and lets her down at the most crucial point. His treatment of Krogstad shows his pettiness and parsimoniousness in very trivial matters. He is embarrassed that Krogstad uses his Christian name to address him, and feels this is inappropriate. "We-well we're on Christian name terms. And the tactless idiot makes no attempt to conceal it when other people are present." This shows he regards how he maybe judged, above what is right. He therefore, considers this to be an apt and suitable reason for dismissing him. Even Nora can see this is immoral and makes no attempt to cover up this feeling, "But it's so petty" this unfortunately annoys Helmer and he immediately sends the letter of dismissal to Krogstad, this shows his power and his control over the situation. ...read more.


This shows deceitfulness and again patronising behaviour. Helmer however, is only adhering to the social morals of the time and therefore, can be sympathised with in a way. He wishes only to protect his reputation, which he has built up and kept unblemished for many years. He obviously loves Nora to an extent, so when she walks out, not only is she leaving him with his reputation in tatters, but also with a feeling of loss. This is therefore a great shock to him and his ethics, causing a scene of tragedy In conclusion, Helmer is a monster in the way he treats his wife, friends and associates. His behaviour towards them is inexcusable and leads us to feel that these actions are outrageous. His pettiness towards Krogstad and lack of understanding towards Nora shows us he is ostentatious. And his dismissal of Dr.Rank and Mrs.Linde gives us another negative view of him. However, he does only adhere to what was socially acceptable at the time, while this may not excuse his behaviour, it leads us to understand it. We may feel a little sympathy for Helmer, but overall he is a self-righteous prig. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Henrik Ibsen section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Henrik Ibsen essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Importance of Scenography in Miss Julie and A Doll's House

    4 star(s)

    He talks about his dreams of buying a title in Romania and becoming a Count. However, as soon as Julie makes any mention of the Count or his house, Jean becomes insecure and disquieted because he realizes that he is still just a mere servant - despite his many ambitious plans for the future.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Nora Helmer vs. Miss Julie - the Role of Women being Degraded by Man

    3 star(s)

    For that reason it can be conveyed that the play suggests the inferiority of women beyond men. Torvald treats Nora as if she was a child, he doesn't take her seriously and therefore she may never stand in a position to contradict him as it is conveyed by the following quote: "Didn't Little Sweet-Tooth just look in at the confectioner's?"

  1. Two Men Destroyed by a Secret: A Comparative Study of Oedipus the King and ...

    This scolding causes Nora's epiphany. She finally realizes the superficial nature of her marriage and leaves Torvald's household. This departure certainly has a destructive effect on Torvald as can be judged from the emotive cries of "Nora! Nora!" (Ibsen, pg 119) uttered following her departure.

  2. A Doll's House Externalizing Inner Problems

    Krogstad: Most of us think of that at first. I thought of it, too - only I hadn't the courage. Nora [dully]: Nor had I. Here, "anything worse" most likely refers to suicide, which Nora had considered but could not muster up enough courage to do it. However, Nora later changes her mind when Krogstad speaks of his plans

  1. In what ways is 'A Doll's House' a suitable title for the play?

    In fact, Nora's performance and preparation for the Tarantella is symbolized by Ibsen. The Christmas tree, a festive object meant to serve a purely decorative purpose, symbolizes Nora's position in her home as a plaything who is pleasing to look at and adds charm to the home.

  2. "A Doll's House" deals with the position of women in matters of marriage and ...

    you for the toast but must disclaim the honour of having consciously worked for the women's rights movement. I am not even quite clear as to just what the women's rights movement really is"1 This quote is best interpreted against the background of Ibsen's frequently voiced declination to belong to parties or societies of any kind.

  1. Investigation of Power in Ibsen's 'A Doll's House'

    However not all of the opening act focuses on Nora's subservience, for example, the device of the macaroons is used to foreshadow the final climax of the play. The forbidden macaroons, that Nora furtively dines upon behind the disapproving Torvald's back, is a demonstration that Nora is not completely in acceptance of her lack of power.

  2. "A Dolls House" feminist critics and the social conventions Of marital life.

    "Oh, Christina, I feel so light hearted and happy! It's delightful to have lots of money, and no need to worry about things, isn't it?" (213) Nora boasts about how successful they are, when Christina is isolated with no family and no money.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work