• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is John Proctor? I am no saint; for me it is fraud. I am not that man. Explore Millers Presentation of Proctor in The Crucible. How far do you agree with Proctors Analysis of himself?

Extracts from this document...


'What is John Proctor? I am no saint; for me it is fraud. I am not that man." Explore Miller's Presentation of Proctor in The Crucible. How far do you agree with Proctor's Analysis of himself? In 1962, Salem was affected dramatically by the tragedy of witchcraft. Miller use's this hard-hitting occurrence to structure his story named ' The crucible'. By using a real event this can really affect the audience and influence them into picking up more understanding of the play and the happenings that are involved, hence the fact that witchcraft does not seem like a fully believable event. Miller uses the 1692 Salem witchcraft trials to symbolize the 1950s anti-Communist purges. The events of the 1692 Salem witch trials mostly parallel those of the McCarthy trials. If you opposed the McCarthy investigations, you were accused of being a communist. If you opposed to the Salem Witch trials, you were accused of being a witch. Those accused suffered great consequences in both the Crucible and the McCarthy trials. As the McCarthy trials were still currently going through during the release of this play it made the play more effective and easier to relate to. ...read more.


The following script after this quotation confirms the audiences suspicions by Proctor and Abigail discussing the relationship that they once had, and Abigail attempting unsuccessfully to rebuild a relationship only by Proctor turning her down firmly. Proctor's relationship with Elizabeth is first introduced at the beginning of Act 2. When Elizabeth delivers Proctor his dinner, it reads that "She watch's him eat" and when he compliments her cooking she "blush's with pleasure". I think this activity shows that Elizabeth is very keen on pleasing Proctor. The audience already know at this point of the extramarital affair that Proctor had with Elizabeth betraying his wife. So at the beginning of act 2 I pick up that Elizabeth is attempting greatly to hang onto their marriage even with their tinted history. As of their history there must be a decent amount of tension between the both and mistrust going on discretely. Proctor is portrayed as a good man but who has made very somewhat foolish mistakes in his past, which he tries to almost block out. When Elizabeth mentions his past betrayal in act two Proctor declares "I have not moved from here to there without I think to please you" I think this shows his immense remorse and that he truly is a good man at heart. ...read more.


top of the fact that its his role as a husband to care for her and to keep her absent from upset. When Proctor attempts to influence Mary Warren into testifying in court on his behalf she informs him of the problem that Elizabeth will expose him of his lechery. Proctor states; "Good, then her saintliness is done with. We will slide together into our pit" this line shows his major courage and that he will risk his pure stainless name for his wife, a sign of trust and heroic behaviour. At this point his selfless motive is to get his wife out of the darkness of the court even if it does risk his name, or if worst comes to worse his life. As Mary Warren has informed Proctor of the girls pretence in court he sets out to relieve the court of their manipulative acts and to output in many more lives being saved, another heroic act. In conclusion I think that Proctor's analysis of himself is somewhat false as throughout the play he has shown signs of heroic occurrences and he has realised of his past mistakes and felt regret. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Other Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Other Plays essays

  1. How does Shakespeare present the two different worlds of Court life and the rural ...

    This shows the devotion and the strong- willedness that hunger has brought out in Orlando. However, hunger also brings out a bad side in Orlando as in Act 2 Scene 7 Orlando disturbs a peaceful meal that Duke Senior and his compatriots are about to partake in.

  2. In As You Like It Act 1 scene 2 and Act 2 scene 3 ...

    half his size, would ever be capable of overpowering a champion wrestler. Rosalind and Celia try to prevent him from participating in the match, but Orlando, fully aware of the danger that lay ahead, would not be swayed.

  1. How and why does the character of Scrooge change?

    In the first stave, Scrooge uses negative, short sentences, giving brash answers and terse instructions. He is unwelcoming and insecure; his Nephew's caring attitude when querying Scrooge's dismissal of a dining proposal, is responded to with the repeated use of "Good afternoon."

  2. Compare and contrast the relationship between Hal and Henry IV and the relationship between ...

    This is portrayed in Henry IV part 1 because Hal seems to emulate Falstaff in several things he does, this is especially palpable in Act 1 scene 2 when Hal agrees to '...go with thee...' (1.2.152) to the robbery at Gad's Hill, precisely like Falstaff.

  1. Discuss the different types of love in Act 3 of As You Like It

    Just from one side of the story, without questioning the truth, Orlando accepted the "help" of a stranger, without even knowing that person. If it was a trap, Orlando would be dead by now, so he is very na�ve. As a woman, Rosalind loves Orlando by heart.

  2. He may be entertaining, he may be clever, but Falstaff is morally repulsive and ...

    This is made very evident when Falstaff tells Hal '...I do not speak to thee in drink, but in/tears; not in pleasure, but in passion; ...' (2.4.341-342). Falstaff is trying to show Hal his affection for him, just as a father has affection for his son; he is trying to

  1. Henry VI Part 1

    knew how to manipulate his public image to his advantage to gain the crown in Richard II's reign and is politically perceptive. Hal realizes that by misbehaving people will think very little of him and overlook him by not expecting him to accomplish anything Redeeming time when men think least

  2. Shakespearean plays have much been linked to Aristotles ideas of tragedy, the protagonists are ...

    The paradox of life then death is very important in Shakespeare?s tragedies as death is the very heart of the paradox of disappointment and is the embodiment of defeat. Death is not used as an extreme expression of human suffering; it is used symbolically to emphasise the disappointment and defeat that accompany it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work