• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Act 4 of the crucible is dynamic theatre; discuss how miller makes this act dramatic

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Act 4 of the crucible is dynamic theatre; discuss how miller makes this act dramatic The Crucible provides us with what can only be described as masterpiece of dramatic writing. Written by Arthur Miller in 1952, the most powerful scenes in "The Crucible" have several common characteristics; very effective use of stage directions, long build-ups of suspense that come crashing down in thundering climaxes, intense displays of emotion and an abundance of dramatic irony. The play, set in 1692, is based upon the outbreak of accusations of witchcraft in Salem, Massachusetts. Miller wrote the play using this 17th-century case (and fictionalising it) to comment on a 20th-century phenomenon - the exposure of suspected communists. In 17th century Salem the inhabitants feared witchcraft as America feared communism in the 1950's; and many similarities can be drawn between the events of the two periods. Both were exaggerated out of all reasonable proportion and each contains communities that display an irrational fear of an ill perceived threat to their stability of life. Indeed, the theme of culpability that runs throughout the play is mirrored constantly in modern society, particularly in politics, where those in office are frequently blamed for incidents that are completely beyond their control. The writing of this play stemmed from Miller's personal interest in the Salem witch trials and at the time, America was in the middle of the McCarthy political "Witch Hunt". ...read more.

Middle

At the very beginning of the scene, we see a representation of the main theme of the story; the helplessness of the villagers against the cruel authority of Danforth, illustrated by the forcible removal of Tituba and Sarah Good from their cell. The power struggle between those in office and the common man draws great empathy from the audience and reinforces the brutality of the entire ordeal. Indeed, the women's response to the guards; "We goin' to Barbados, soon devil gits here..." highlights the villagers' great superstition around Satan, giving the audience insight into how the situation has spiraled out of control, and how their fears fuel the fires of hysteria, allowing the oppression of the villagers to continue unabated. Conversely, a shining example of the theme of resistance is seen in John Proctor. Despite the efforts of his accusers to completely strip him of his dignity, leaving him chained, bedraggled and "filthy", Proctor still retains the courage of his convictions and remains firm in his principles. Even though acquiescing to Danforth's demands would result in his release, Proctor destroys his confession, steadfastly and hysterically refusing to surrender his name to his enraged captor, maintaining that "I have given you my soul; leave me my name!". This defiance towards authority is not encouraged by his wife Elizabeth, but does elicit admiration from several of the villagers, most notably Rebecca, who also refuses to "sell her soul". ...read more.

Conclusion

Equally we see the irony surrounding a power-hungry character who demands to be addressed as "Honour" and "Excellency" as these titles are arguably antonyms when given to such a brutal character as Danforth, and indeed more recently, albeit on a lesser scale, McCarthy. A significant phrase used during the Salem interrogations; "Did you ever see...with the devil?" can be directly linked to the language often used during the McCarthy communist 'witch-hunt' of 1950's USA, as ironically, Russia, and by association communism, was colloquially referred to as the 'devil'. This shows that although many phrases may have been abandoned since the 17th century, the fundamental tenet of this expression still remains today. Throughout the Crucible we see Miller create consistently dynamic theatre by providing us with the classic conventions of effective drama; structured plot, evocative setting and spectacular use of language. Character conflict is also an integral part of the action, as this helps not only to establish the two main protagonists that can be found at the heart of any good story, but also gives the audience an insight into the mind-set of some of the more complex characters. Overall, Miller constructs a successful allegory that allows the audience to experience the suffering of those involved in the witch hunts, and through effective and inescapable comparison, the McCarthy period. Truly, the Crucible is a direct social comment on what transpired during that era, and continues to be relevant today, as the main themes of blame and accusation are still prevalent in modern society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Arthur Miller essays

  1. Dramatic tension is created by Miller throughout the Crucible in many ways. Straightaway, the ...

    There are many good honest characters in "The Crucible". Their loyalties are tested by the witch trials in Salem, especially the loyalty of Giles and John Proctor. Miller describes Giles as an old unintelligent man, but the audience recognize his goodness when he refuses to give the names of his friends so they don't get involved in the prosecutions of the witch trials.

  2. Free essay

    How successful is The Crucible as an allegory?

    in fear of what they didn't know, People say, 'what doesn't kill me only makes me stronger,' It was apparent that Salem did not believe in this. They believe that what was the unknown was what could kill them, and they lived in great fear of these tribes who lived

  1. By What means does Miller create a sense of Expectations within his audience in ...

    Eddie becomes very agitated whilst watching Rodolfo and Catherine dance, as shown in the following stage directions. This shows us that when Eddie mentions Rodolfo's many talents, hinting he thinks he is gay-'But if I could cook, if I could sing, if I could make dresses, I wouldn't be on the waterfront.

  2. How does Miller use the concept of witchcraft for dramatic effect and to expose ...

    I believe Abigail said that the girls have returned to God because this would sway the judge's perspective of her to a positive mode and therefore make her appear to be honest and telling the truth. She claims that John Proctor is a liar when Proctor says, "It is a whore!"

  1. In Act 3 of 'The Crucible', how are Dramatic Devices and Events Used by ...

    The strict religion of Puritanism forces upholders of the Social order like Judge Danforth into thinking in 'black and white', such as good or evil, capitalist or communist. In this case you're either with the court, or against it, devoutly religious, or submerged in the devils work.

  2. The Crucible - analysing acts 3 and 4.

    I think he believes that the witchcraft is fake, but externally he is still a strict and craving for a good reputation. If he did believe people at the end of the play, then he would not convict John Proctor, but he did because it was to late then, and

  1. The Crucible Act 3

    an accusation against Putnam that he made his daughter cry witch against his wife because he wants Giles' land. When Danforth asks for the name of the supposedly honest man who heard Putnam talk to his daughter about accusing Martha Corey, Giles says he can not give him the name because that innocent will then go to jail.

  2. John Proctor is the tragic hero of "The Crucible". Discuss

    his reputation and tell the community of his sin, which provided him the evidence he needed to persuade the court Abigail was a fraud. John Proctor is a dynamic character throughout the play and that is shown in the decisions he made that lead to effective change.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work