Act one is not relevant Vs Act one is of premier importance - Othello

Authors Avatar

        

Act one is not relevant Vs Act one is of premier importance

Shakespeare has included Act one as an introduction into his play, a device that presents each character, his faults and his virtues. If Act one was not present the play would be about Othello and not Iago’s manipulation, whom I believe the play is centred on.

         Iago’s evil behaviour is present in Act one allowing the audience Knowledge of his character and foresight into the occurrences of the play. Without Act one however Iago’s wickedness would be somewhat veiled; the audience would not know of his hatred for the Moor nor would they know his reasons for such actions. This would obviously add more fear and darkness into the play as no fears manners one cannot comprehend. This said the play would not be a Shakespearian masterpiece if the audience did not know everything about every important character on stage.

Join now!

         Blake argues for Othello’s poesy and Shakespeare includes this in Iago’s character also. His Dialogue with Roderigo highlights his cunning trickery. Shakespeare constructs Iago’s speech using almost perfect Iambic pentameters always- highlighting his control for his own emotions and well as other characters.  

        At the end of Act one Shakespeare employs a very unique device in the discourse between Iago and Roderigo. The repetition of “put money in thy purse” is almost hypnotic, subliminal even.  The audience get an impression of superiority here. Iago’s character demands fearful respect from the audience for his handling of Roderigo. Iago treats ...

This is a preview of the whole essay