"Although he could write hilarious comedy, Hardy was more inclined to see things in a tragic light." How far do you agree with both parts of this statement? Refer to two stories to support your answer.

Authors Avatar

Jenni Duffy

Jenni Duffy

“Although he could write hilarious comedy, Hardy was more inclined to see things in a tragic light.” How far do you agree with both parts of this statement? Refer to two stories to support your answer.

Thomas Hardy was one of the best writers of the nineteenth century and wrote many short stories. I have read two of these: “Tony Kytes, the Arch-Deceiver” and “Old Mrs Chundle”. I do agree, “Although he could write hilarious comedy, Hardy was more inclined to see things in a tragic light” because although the stories tell very different tales they are set out in the same way: comedy, tragedy then irony. One story is funnier and the other sees things in a more tragic light.

Both stories are quite comical which is shown in the situations the characters find themselves in. In “Tony Kytes, the Arch-Deceiver” Tony ends up with three women in his wagon, two of which are hiding in the back of it. We can already predict that something funny is going to happen. He then gets off his wagon leaving the reins of the horse with the third woman resulting in a comical crash where each woman discovers that Tony has been leading them on. I think that this story is funnier than “Old Mrs Chundle” as it is more light-hearted and does not have such a tragic ending. At the end of “Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver” Tony ends up marrying the woman that he was supposed to marry in the first place; another comical situation with a hint of irony in it. This is because Tony has gone to all the trouble of flattering these three women and then in the end he marries the woman he was engaged to in the first place!

On the other hand in “Old Mrs Chundle” there are less comical situations and more tragic ones. The story is about a new curate at a parish who meets Mrs Chundle. She is deaf and tells him she goes to church when she doesn’t. He takes this up as a challenge and persuades her to go but she can’t hear the sermon. This like “Tony Kytes, the Arch-Deceiver” already suggests that something funny is going to happen. So the curate sets up some special equipment for Mrs Chundle to hear which, in the end, results in him having to cut his sermon short as her breath smells to bad for him to carry on! This appears to be the only comical situation as the rest of the story is quite tragic and ironic. The irony is shown in the situation where just as the curate decides to go round to see Mrs Chundle – she’s dead. The curate then finds out that she has left everything to him in her will! Although I do not think that these stories are hilarious, we have to remember that Hardy was writing in a different era and for a different audience who did not have televisions or videos for entertainment.

Join now!

In “Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver”, although it is a more comical story than “Old Mrs Chundle”, the fact that two women turn Tony down when he proposes marriage, suggests that Hardy wrote and saw things in a tragic light. I do not think that this situation is particularly tragic but sadder. Despite this it does suggest that Hardy did write and see things in a tragic light. This appears to be the only tragic or sad element as the rest of the story is quite comical and less serious.

On the other hand in “Old Mrs Chundle” the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay