• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An inspector calls

Extracts from this document...


An inspector calls Explore how Priestley uses the contrasting views of Birling & inspector Goole to criticise British society. An inspector calls is a play written by John Boynton Priestley in 1945. The play is set in 1912, which is used for dramatic effect throughout the play so we know background information on characters that maybe we shouldn't. Such as the fact Mr Birling is mostly wrong in his views & we find him arrogant because we know he is wrong eventhough the events could sway either way in the play. The theme running through this play is all about responsibility, Birling, one of the main characters, is questioned on the death of a girl & his views on responsibility by the inspector who has completely contrary ideas to Mr Birling. From the fact the audience know of the outcome of the Titanic, the 2 world wars, Russian revolution & the general strike we tend not to trust what Birling thinks as we know he is wrong about them all. I have classed this play as a medieval morality & unity play as it fits all or most of the criteria's needed to be these. Ignoring the fact the play was not written in a medieval time. For a medieval morality play, it has the same theme of responsibility running through the play, & all other aspects of a unity play. It has borrowed some features of a unity play & also a medieval morality play, which makes it hard to place in a genre because it does not have all the features of one genre. ...read more.


The audience tend to believe the character of Inspector Goole as he is preferred over Mr Birling & also more trustworthy from not lecturing us about world wars that have happened. Inspector Goole's views are emphasised by the fact Mr. Birling disagrees. Inspector Goole is a character of, "massiveness, solidity & purposefulness". He speaks, "carefully" & has a "disconcerting habit of looking hard at the person he addresses before actually speaking". Inspector Goole's name is somewhat abnormal & the audience may think so too, triggering words that sound the same as Goole such as ghoul, which is some sort of ghostly creature. This name makes us wonder why Priestley named him this. Suspicion is aroused when we find out that Inspector Goole might not even exist. Inspector Goole clearly thinks that, "We are responsible for each other" and because we assume Mr Birling's argument against this is wrong we are forced into thinking that we are responsible for each other. The Inspector is always building tension, making sure the story unravels slowly & painstakingly, only speaking to one initial person at any time. This makes the mood tense throughout. When the curtain falls quickly at the end of scenes it keeps the audience wanting more. Mr Birling & Inspector Goole couldn't be more different, which is why the play is so effective at getting a point across. At the start of the play there is harsh lighting on Mr Birling so we instantly know we will not warm to him. It is the stage direction in which we see that he is not a nice man, not someone you could confide in if you had a problem. ...read more.


His use of lighting & stage direction to show the mood is a good way of setting a scene without any action or speech. I think the fact speech is not used, it is much more effective as the audience feel 'it' instead of having to see 'it' and then think about 'it'. The use of dramatic irony was to give the audience an upper hand and knowledge superior to Birling; this was used to shape Birling's character & the audience's views on him. This seems effective when he disagrees with Inspector, due to dramatic irony, we do not trust him and decide Inspector Goole is right on responsibility which is an open subject. Without the aid of this character Priestley would have found it hard to emphasise his point of responsibility. All in all Priestly used the contrasting views of Birling & Inspector to criticise certain aspects of British society such as the stereotyping of lower & higher class citizens. Birling being the snobbish, high middle class person, indulgent & proud. Inspector a totally different being in most characteristics & viewpoints. Then Eva Smith, the low class citizen who Birling cares not for she got into trouble because of other people & ended up dead for it. Responsibility is widely discussed throughout the play and there are many different techniques of getting the point across. The play was meant to appeal to more than the characters and that is the audience, the very fact that it is aimed at the audience concludes that Priestley has criticised British society, and he did it by using contrasting characters to share his views and teach them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. J.B Priestley's use of language, character, and setting for dramatic effect in 'An Inspector ...

    of maintaining the tension within the play, by indicating that something substantial is going to happen rather soon; whether this is something that someone is going to say or something that someone is going to do. The Inspector doesn't give any clues away about her death, but he makes sure

  2. This essay will explore the functions of inspector Goole in the play "An inspector ...

    One of his techniques is questioning the characters one by one ,"... One person and one line of enquiry at a time...", Inspector Goole uses this technique to treat the Birling family as murder suspects, by questioning them one by one.

  1. Inspector Calls - Use of Characters to criticise aspects of British Society

    the old values of his family, but through the play Priestley shows a change in Gerald where you see his compassion, but at the end as soon as he realises it is a hoax "Even then, that may have all been nonsense," he seems to forget everything that he has

  2. Directors notes and stage instructions for An Inspector Calls

    The Inspectors role in this play is one of a moral messenger. He is Priestley's mouth piece to speak to the audience and convince them to change for the better and not revert to the old ways. Although Eric is the only character to commit an actually criminal offence it

  1. An Inspector Calls.

    Wellses do all the talking. We hardheaded businessmen must say something sometime. And we don't guess - we've had experience - and we know. Although Sheila has been able to see that all is not perfect in the world of the Birlings after her interrogation with the Inspector, the older

  2. Compare and contrast the characters of Inspector Goole and Mr Birling in Act One. ...

    By treating everyone equally and not responding to any comments made on class, he composes himself to a socialist view. Socialists are 'radical reformers'; they strive for social change and want greater liberty. Mr Birling's views are in profound contrast to that of the Inspectors.

  1. "Public men, Mr Birling, have their responsibilities as well as their privileges." Show how ...

    The family is obviously well off and appear to have a nice life. The play starts off with the Birling family celebrating their daughter Sheila, on her engagement to Gerald Croft. As they commence in conversation, Mr Birling engages in his series of confident ironic speeches filled with dramatic irony.

  2. What would Priestley's ideal world be and how does 'An Inspector Calls' show this

    Here Sheila uses her power as a highly regarded customer to get Eva Smith sacked from Milwards. She only uses this power on the spur of the moment unlike Mr. Birling who plans to use his power against Eva Smith.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work