• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An Inspector calls - character analysis.

Extracts from this document...


Birling Priestley describes him in the opening stage directions as a 'rather portentous man', full of his own self-importance. In the play, he is certainly very concerned with his social position - he twice mentions that he was Lord Mayor as a way of impressing Gerald (pp.8, 11), and mentions the knighthood to him, even though it is far from definite. He is solely worried about how his family's reputation will suffer at the inquest when he hears of Mrs Birling's part in the girl's death (p.45), and he is more concerned about how to 'cover...up' Eric's thefts (p.54) than about how to put them right. He tries to use first Gerald's family name (p.13) and then his friendship with the Chief Constable (p.16) as ways of bullying the Inspector; he obviously believes that others are as easily impressed by social connections as he is. (We know he is easily impressed because of his evident pride at Gerald's family background; he obviously believes he has made a good match for Sheila.) His key characteristic is his complacency. He is well-off (as the opening stage directions suggest), and he believes he always will be: that 'we're in for a time of steadily increasing prosperity' (p.6). This success, however, has been at the expense of others - he threw the girl out of her job for asking for a modest rise, and intends in the future to work with Crofts Limited 'for lower costs and higher prices' (p.4), exploiting his power as a capitalist to profit at the expense of others. Birling does not believe he has a responsibility to society, only to his family: 'a man has to mind his own business and look after himself and his own' (p.10). He is not upset, unlike Eric, at hearing the details of the girl's death (p.12), which shows him to be a little heartless. He is suspiciously defensive when he thinks the Inspector is accusing him of causing it, and - like Mrs Birling - is relieved when he thinks the finger is no longer pointing at him. ...read more.


Sheila's refusal to take back his ring suggests that, despite the Inspector's relatively lenient judgement of him, he is far from exonerated, in her eyes and in ours. Eric Unlike Gerald, Priestley describes Eric in the opening stage directions as 'not quite at ease'. He has been expensively educated, and yet he is a disappointment to Birling: he and Gerald joke behind his back (p.10), and his father patronises him (p.12). He is kept out of the information about his father's possible knighthood, and when he really needed help he felt his father was 'not the kind of father a chap could go to when he's in trouble' (p.54). His drinking is an open secret within the family (though Mrs Birling chooses not to admit it to herself), and suggests that he lacks self-discipline. This is borne out by the behaviour that is revealed in the course of the play: he forced himself into the girl's lodgings despite her protests, drunk and 'in that state when a chap easily turns nasty' (p.52), has made her pregnant, and has stolen money from his father. But he also has an honesty that others lack. He is the only one to respond spontaneously to details of the girl's death (p.11), and when he is forced to admit how he behaved towards her he has a strong sense of guilt because the consequences of what he did are so serious. We also believe him when he tells Birling that he would have let the girl stay at the factory (p.16) - but Eric throughout the play is shown to be naive, even if his heart is often in the right place. (Stealing Birling's money, even though a crime in law, might be another example of this.) He does not have the realistic outlook necessary to make a success of his life. He is also shown to be immature, regarding the girl as a 'good sport' (p.52), although she treated him as a child. ...read more.


They must decide whether to change or not - Sheila and Eric do; the Birlings and perhaps Gerald do not. The Inspector has a moral dimension which makes him different from an ordinary policeman: he is more concerned with right and wrong than with what is legal. He sternly tells Birling, for example, that 'it's better to ask for the earth [as a worker might do] than to take it [which Birling does]' (p.15). But he also tells the characters that 'if you're easy with me, I'm easy with you' (p.22) - he has compassion for those who are willing to accept their responsibility, but nothing so simple as forgiveness. After all, 'the girl's [still] dead though'. Each character is punished in an appropriate way. Birling fears for his family's reputation at the inquest; Sheila feels shame for her selfishness; Gerald has his affair revealed in front of Sheila; Mrs Birling has her illusions about the respectability of her family shattered by Eric; and Eric is revealed before his indulgent parents as a spoilt and inadequate young man. But notice how in each case the punishment is a consequence of their own behaviour; the Inspector himself does not bring punishment from outside. Perhaps this is why they are given a second chance at the end of the play - that their experience should have been a warning to them, and that next time, it is the apocalyptic future predicted by the Inspector's final speech that lies in store for them and for us. Summary * The Inspector sees through each character. * He forces each character to admit what they already secretly know. * He is Priestley's vehicle for his views on social responsibility. * He is the catalyst for the play's events. * He controls the play's events. * He has a moral dimension. * He brings about each character's punishment through their own actions. * He is each character's last chance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE J.B. Priestley section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE J.B. Priestley essays

  1. Discussthe role of the Inspector in the play 'An Inspector Calls'

    was genuinely in need but still turned her away in a careless fashion. As the inspector tells her, "You refused her even the pitiable little bit of organised charity you had in your power to grant her ". It is Sybil's uncaring attitude that makes her actions seem even worse.

  2. How does the character of Sheila Change during the course of J.B. Preistely's "Inspector ...

    So she turns Gerald down. In the beginning we portrayed Sheila as a very superficial person who was only knows the obvious. She is also a selfish and self-centred person like when she went to Milward only thinking about herself she got Eva Smith sacked from her she also said "I couldn't be sorry for her."

  1. "An Inspector Calls" - Which Character do you have the most sympathy for?

    I feel some sympathy for "Eva" because she feels remorseful and is sent into hysterics after realising the harsh truth- "She's Dead". I feel a different sort of sympathy to that I felt for Gerald. This is because she had no relationship with the woman, but after finding out she

  2. Write a letter from Priestley to a colleague explaining his reasons for, and his ...

    over working-class employees - Arthur Birling could treat people with no respect, just because he had the ability to do so. When confronted by the Inspector, Arthur Birling states he has no "responsibility" for the death of Eva and when the Inspector tries to contradict him, Arthur starts to become

  1. Directors notes and stage instructions for An Inspector Calls

    He reveals to Eric how his mother turned away the girl, thus killing her own grandchild and Eric's child, this enrages Eric and causes him to turn on his mother and become threatening. Inspector: (with calm authority) 'I'll tell you.

  2. "You and I aren't the same people who sat down together before dinner" Sheila ...

    Birling also repeats his earlier opinion on community, telling the Inspector that he "can't accept any responsibility� for what happened to her, even though it may have been a chain of events. He believes that if everyone was responsible for each other, "it would be very awkward.� When asked why

  1. An Inspector Calls Coursework - How Does Sheila Birling's Character Change as a Result ...

    In Act One, the family is celebrating the engagement of Sheila and Gerald. Sheila is presented as excitable and eager to please her family and Gerald: after she has received her ring she says, "(excited) Oh - it's wonderful! Look - Mummy - isn't it a beauty?

  2. Show how the production of "An Inspector Calls" enhanced the script and furthered your ...

    to wake up the family and disturb them from their happy life. The production also gave me a clear vision of the Inspectors appearance and the rest. Before the production all I knew about the Inspectors appearance was that he was: "dressed in a plain darkish suit of the period."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work