Analyse the ways in which different directors have produced the first meeting of

Authors Avatar

Analyse the ways in which different directors have produced the first meeting of “Romeo and Juliet” when they deliver the sonnet. [Act 1 Sc V Lines 93-106]

“Romeo and Juliet”, undoubtedly one of Shakespeare’s most famous and loved plays, has been produced by many directors again and again over the last 400 years. Those directors, who dare to take on such an astounding play, have to deal with this sensitively enough to keep the passion alive, especially throughout the sonnet. Two directors who have accepted the challenge to are Baz Luhrmann in 1997 and the BBC School’s version. In my personal opinion, Baz Luhrmann’s version was a great success, appealing to teenagers and adults alike, showing the passion and romance of this beautiful tragedy throughout it all. But on the other hand, the BBC School’s version, which was originally intended solely for education purposes, is an extremely insipid composition and included no romance or passion, all of which I felt was an insult to Shakespeare. These two versions will be analysed by focusing and commenting on these features; setting, costume, camera shots, delivery of lines and music.

        

Firstly, the use of costume is particularly emphatic and effective in Baz Luhrmann’s amazing 1997 production. Baz Luhrmann has used his own personal genius with the costumes, using Shakespeare’s original directions of masks, but also upgrading them to fancy dress costumes. This device though it was very simple, is powerfully effective and provokes sublime-style messages to the audience, through its symbolism.  Juliet, for example, is dressed as an Angel. Being dressed this way, stimulates the audience into believing Juliet is innocent, pure, virginal and heavenly. These hidden messages cause us to believe it beyond our protest. Also in costume is Romeo, as a Knight, very much so in shining armour. As a ‘Knight’ he has to save the ‘Angel;’ [Juliet] from Paris who is dressed as an astronaut [to symbolize that he is out of this world, and abnormal]. It is clear that all though the characters are just dressed in costumes, it also aids us to sub-consciously take things in and believe them, which was the director’s aim [to appeal to the ‘sharp-eyed’ viewers].

        In contrast, the BBC School’s version is the complete opposite. The costumes in this version, are very traditional and bland, that do not really have any effect on us at all. The only thing that they do remind us of is the era. But, it is also noticeable that the costumes had a lot of attention paid to them, and probably a vast amount of the budget spent on them. I praise this version for its attempt to really show the time period of the play through the costumes. Also, Romeo wears a mask to show it is still a masked ball conforming to Shakespeare’s original directions. Baz Luhrmann’s choice of costumes had much more of an impact on me then the BBC School’s choice did. Luhrmann’s costumes were not only more interesting, but also had much more depth to them rather than just trying to be within the era.

Join now!

        

Another feature that I consider vastly different between the two productions is the use of camera shots. In Baz Luhrmann’s version, the camera shots are used very compelling and seem to perfectly show just the right shots for the scene. The shots also seem to keep the scene alive, because it is always moving and showing new interesting angles to the viewer. The camera shots are particularly impressive at the moment before the kiss, by the lift. The camera flashes between Romeo and Juliet flirting and anticipating the kiss, to Lady Capulet and Paris having fun at the party. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay