Analysis of Act IV scene 1, in three different versions of The Merchant Of Venice

Authors Avatar

ENGLISH COURSEWORK

SHAKESPEARE’S

THE MERCHANT OF VENICE

David Burns

Year 12

INTRODUCTION

The three versions of the Merchant of Venice which I have watched are:

  1. Channel 4 television version for their Schools Broadcasting Programmes
  2. Trevor Nunn’s version
  3. National Theatre Company version directed by Jonathan Miller and starring Laurence Olivier as Shylock

Act IV scene 1 is an intense scene in the play where we see many of the play’s main themes such as justice and mercy, money and status, revenge, loyalty, love and prejudice and tolerance.

Shakespeare presents a harsh character in Shylock the Jew, but the fact that he also gives him the chance to speak more than any other European playwright preceding him would suggest that his portrayal is not conventional but much more complex for example in his words in Act III scene 1, lines 57-58: “I am a Jew.  Hath not a Jew eyes?  Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions?”  Much of Shakespeare’s enduring appeal has been in his amazing portrayal of the complexities of the human condition for example Hamlet or Macbeth.  Traditionally Jews were the evil villains of Elizabethan drama, frequently Machiavellian or greedy but unlike his contemporaries Shakespeare’s characters were never simply ‘good’ or ‘evil’ but embody the complex mix within each of us that makes us human.

The main dilemma in staging this play today is in the consideration of Shakespeare’s possible anti-semitism and/or sympathies towards his character and indeed whether Shylock only represents the Jewish people or whether he is symbolic of oppression of minority races in general.  Through Shylock’s forced conversion in this scene we are reminded of the conversions of other religions according to the ruler of the time such as Henry VIII.  This would suggest that Shakespeare is using Shylock as more than a symbol of ‘Jewishness’.  In this piece of coursework I will be examining mainly how sympathetic or unsympathetic the various versions seem to be and how each Director has succeeded in making the character of Shylock worthy of Shakespeare’s realism.

Jews were traditionally viewed as outsiders and were not citizens.  Christians as far back as the 11th century could not lend money without interest and many Jews earned a living from this ‘profession’ as they could not join the artisan guilds.  As they became their own debt collectors they soon became the target of resentment.  A myth was born; with which Shakespeare’s audience would have been familiar, of ritual murder or ‘blood libel’ that Jews would kill adult Christians.  It is to this myth to which Shakespeare seems to allude in the ‘pound of flesh’ incident in this scene.  Shakespeare is original in showing us the extent to which Shylock is oppressed by Christians surrounding him and it is through this that Shakespeare succeeds in drawing out sympathy from his audience.


Analysis of Act IV scene 1

In the text of Act IV scene 1 before we meet Shylock he is described as “a stony adversary, an inhuman wretch, incapable of pity, void and empty from any dram of mercy”.  Antonio describes Shylock’s spirit as being full of “tyranny and rage”.  When Shylock enters into the scene the Duke challenges him saying “The world thinks, and I think so too, that thou but leadest this fashion of thy malice To the last hour of act, and then ‘tis thought Thou’lt show thy mercy and remorse more strange than is thy strange apparent cruelty”.  At this point the audience is immediately drawn into the suspense of the scene.  The Duke speaks for everyone in hoping that Shylock will back down.  The combination of the Duke’s speech on mercy and his hope for “a gentle answer” with Shylock’s contemptuous reply serves to further provoke the audience.  Calling Shylock ‘Jew’ instead of using his name also manipulates the audience's reactions into thinking of the stereotype rather than the individual.  At this point the Duke says “Let him stand before our face” suggests Shylock should stand centre stage for this speech.  Shylock’s reply to the Duke and onlookers is so long winded that he immediately loses favour.  This speech would be effective if he was standing up as he speaks about his values.  It is a central point in the scene as it is his first opportunity to defend himself but he does not elicit sympathy from his onlookers.  He is instead twisting, evasive and difficult: “So can I give no reason, nor I will not, more than a lodged hatred and a certain loathing I bear Antonio”.  He ends this key speech in his defence with an open admission of his hatred.  His illustrations of animals, later paralleled in Antonio’s speech, are deliberately offensive.  He plays with the words of Bassanio, twists them and turns them back on the speaker providing a quickfire dialogue which builds up the tension from the outset.  The repeated references to “the Jew” suggest an element of anti-semitism.  The imagery of the wolf and the lamb is very effective as it evokes both blood lust for an innocent creature and also the key theme of religion in the form of the lamb of God.  His “Jewish heart” again evokes the stereotype of the unfeeling moneylender.  

Join now!

The Duke’s repeated pleas for mercy, a key theme in the scene, serve only to enforce Shylock’s determination to have exactly what he is owed: the pound of flesh.  Ironically this steadfast and unrelenting desire to have his ‘bond’ is what ultimately results in his downfall at the end of the scene.  There is a certain irony in Shylock’s swearing on “our holy Sabbath” to have his bond as God teaches forgiveness.  His demand of “What judgement shall I dread, doing no wrong?” conveys his arrogance as he seems utterly convinced of being in the right.  

When Shylock challenges ...

This is a preview of the whole essay