• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analysis of "Strange meeting" by Wilfred Owen and "The Man He killed" by Thomas Hardy

Extracts from this document...


Analysis of "Strange meeting" by Wilfred Owen and "The Man He killed" by Thomas Hardy Hardy's and Owen's poem are both war poems. Thomas Hardy's poem uses much more realistic language to set the scene, but in my opinion Owen's poem is much more poignant because it is a poem about psychological guilt and haunting. Owen uses rhyming couplets in his poem, which is quite a simple technique, so you could argue that Hardy's poem is the better one. However in my opinion this is not the case, because Owen uses much more emotive and evocative language to get his point across. It is also generally more focused on the psychological effects of war, whereas Hardy's seems much more curious about the whole idea and reality of war. "The Man He killed" is a pre-First World War poem, and it is also worth noting that Thomas Hardy was not a war poet and was never a soldier so had never experienced war first hand. By knowing this fact, without even reading the poems you can say that Hardy will not be able to paint a picture of war as vividly as Owen. ...read more.


The dead man is implying that he also had the same view upon war as Owen. Because Owen is making the man he killed so alike to himself, I think he is trying to convey that because he has experienced war and killing, he has consequently killed a part of himself. More evidence to back up the theory that the man Owen killed is part of himself can be found in the 25th line where the man says: "The pity of war, the pity war distilled" This was a phrase that Owen himself once used, and the fact that the dead man in this poem uses it cannot be simply coincidence. The quote above agrees with a statement in a preface that Owen wrote: "My subject is War and the pity of War. The Poetry is in the pity." However if you look at the character in Owen's poem from a different perspective, you can say that if he has killed someone who could have been a friend, this illustrates and emphasises the pointlessness of war. The line after the one shown above is also quite significant. ...read more.


However, Thomas Hardy does try to justify to himself why he killed another man, he seems as if he is trying to make an excuse: "Because, because he was my foe; just so" In this line, Hardy is trying to justify his killing of a man, a man that he has stated earlier in the poem that he would go for a drink with. Owen seems very anti-war, whereas Hardy seems relatively neutral on the case of war. The way Hardy writes the poem with natural sounding rhymes and an informal style means that it sounds much more like a conversation between Hardy and the reader. I much prefer Wilfred Owen's poem. This is because it has a darker feel to it because of the setting, also because of the language that Owen uses. His poem has lots of hidden meanings that makes the reader think more, whereas Hardy's poem is less thought provoking and memorable, which is why I think Owen's is the better poem, as a poem should not just be read, then put down, it should force the reader to think about its meaning and what ideas it is trying to convey. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Comparisons section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Comparisons essays

  1. Seamus Heaney : Comparisons

    crock of the pelvis' this metaphorical language makes the light shine through the clouds as the meaning to me creeps threw as I know the background information of what Seamus Heaney believed about the IRA. In comparison to the fact that this poem is called 'Bog Queen' the next stanza

  2. Analyse at least two dramatic monologues and explore how the poet creates a realistic ...

    the pre 1900s it was seen as not having any modesty, it would shock the reader as how can someone do such a thing as these things laid uncovered and here it is being revealed very openly. the way he describes the woman in such a sexual way describing her

  1. Comparing 'Fall in' and 'dulce et decorum est'

    demonstrates that Begbie expects all men to fight against the 'tyrant's blow' as 'brothers'. He also compares England's call to God's call showing that he thinks that Gods thinks that all men should fight against the Germans and their allies as well.

  2. Analysing And Contrasting Two Poems

    know what they are doing but we do know that they are uncontrollable. We understand that their characters are very sick minded and that they are very corrupt, "Double dares took root in night soil". This quote proves that the KKK is indeed very corrupt because they are daring to do such awful things.

  1. Nothings changed by Tatamkhulu Afrika and I am not that woman by Kishwar Naheed ...

    from entering the "haute cuisine." Therefore, Afrika gives a clear image to the reader that Apartheid still exists. In "I am not that woman" Kishawar Naheed attempts to redefine the man-woman relationship; and address the situation she faces in her everyday life of exploitation and oppression.

  2. Poetry analysis

    The contrast in these two settings underlines the fact that no matter where you are, childhood innocence will unavoidably be affected. While investigating the loss of childhood innocence in Duffy's poem, the opening half of the poem stresses the child's innocence to the reader, and as we continue through the poem, the child grows and loses her childhood innocence.

  1. 'Compare 'Old Man, Old Man' by U.A. Fanthorpe and 'Warning' by Jenny Joseph. What ...

    In 'Old Man, Old Man', stanza one and two has a sad and dismal tone as the changes in the old man are viewed. 'He lives in a world of small recalcitrant things in bottles' and 'small things distress'. 'I've lost my hammer'.

  2. How does Wilfred Owen in Disabled treat the subject of exclusion? Including comparisons with ...

    heightens the horrific sense of unredeemable loss which ensures pity in the poem. The disabled man also faces exclusion from the reader. The narrator conveys a proportional amount of what he is trying say and expresses his feelings for him, so he is not personally connecting with the reader, someone

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work