• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Animal testing

Extracts from this document...


Animal testing Animal testing is a rather controversial subject that many people have a very strong opinion on. In this article we will be discussing whether the benefits of animal testing outweigh the suffering caused. This article will take detailed looks at both the advantages and disadvantages coming to a clear conclusion after looking at the advantages and disadvantages of animal testing. For many years medical research had advanced via the help which is quite obviously an advantage. Thanks to animal testing new medical advances have occurred when they are not likely to have done without the aid of animal testing. Vaccines for diseases such as tetanus, polio and TB which have all nearly completely eradicated the disease they are trying to stop had all been approved by animal testing. Even many years before the small pox vaccine that was not tested on animals but the cow played a vital roll in making the vaccine. ...read more.


The drug though was unknown by scientists to cause deformities in the developing foetus of a women. Prove to some that testing drugs on animals does not work. Also another case of animal testing gone wrong is penicillin. Penicillin was tested on mice and was said to kill humans as the mice had died. Penicillin was then only first used on humans when one of the drugs testers had to use it as his last hope for his dying daughter who was suffering from blood poisoning. He did not expect it to work as it had killed the mice, but it worked and now penicillin is one of the most used drugs in the world as it is a drug that stops an internal infection. Prove to many that animal testing does not work and is misleading. For many years there has been many protest made by people regarding the morality of animal testing, and that point is thought of very strongly. ...read more.


An other argument from a person who believes that animal testing is morally is that few animals every really receive any pain as they are killed before they have a chance to suffer, but of course the feeling given out by animal rights protester are that it is morally wrong just to kill the animal for what they see as no fit reason. It is clear to see that for every advantage that people give for animal testing that some people will give a disadvantage of it. So it is quite hard to come to a clear conclusion in whether animal testing is right or wrong. But when I pondered the issue of animal testing, the first thing that popped into my mind was, "Would I rather have some rats suffer and maybe die, or would I like to watch a loved one die a slow death?" The answer to this question was easy for me. How about you? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Coursework B Animal Testing

    he also calls them violent which is a biased remark as he is in the organisation against them so he is not telling the full story to both views and all of the anti-vivisection are not all violent. Other bias comments is that he calls them names such as 'These

  2. Of Mice and Men - Loneliness

    Candy is described as a "tall, stoop-shouldered old man" with "a round stick-like wrist, but no hand." and "bristly white whiskers". It is thought he lost his hand in a farm accident and this has resulted in him being given the worst job on the farm-that of 'swamper' or menial cleaner.

  1. Should animal testing be banned?

    To call a species such as this, more important that one such as a rabbit, which never causes harm to us or the Earth, is unbelievably naive. I also feel that another argument for animal testing is completely absurd, and it is that people say all these animals don't feel

  2. Animal Testing

    something is tested on an animal and it causes harm but doesn't kill it, yet its reaction seems to satisfy the scientists conducting on it, it doesn't mean that a human using it will react the seem way and the drug could end up being with-drawn, causing unnecessary suffering and wasting time and resources.

  1. Arguments for and against Animal testing. I disagree with K. Archibalds opinion of banning ...

    Nowadays, about 2.78 million animals are used as part of animal research in the UK each year. Most of the animal research used is pet species such as dogs and cats. Cats and dogs make up 0.3% of the total number of animals used each year.

  2. Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing

    reactions to pain are virtually identical (both humans and animals scream, for example). When animals are used for product toxicity testing or laboratory research, they are subjected to painful and frequently deadly experiments. Two of the most commonly used toxicity tests are the Draize test and the LD50 test, both

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work