Arthur Miller felt that it was important to engage the audience's emotions - How far do you agree he has done this successfully in

Authors Avatar

James Thorogood

English essay

Arthur Miller felt that it was important to engage the audience’s emotions.

How far do you agree he has done this successfully in “The Crucible”?   

When Arthur Miller wrote the play, “The Crucible” in 1953 the contemporary audience could relate to the play due to the media coverage that was occurring at the time.

This era was concerned with the political movement communism, for example the McCarthy trials. These were court hearings where people were accused of being involved with communism. Miller’s play was seen by the contemporary audience as relevant because of the effects of mass hysteria- the destruction of the community in Salem. Miller felt that the play had relevance although he didn’t no write it for that.

 The play is set in Salem, Massachusetts, involving a small community of Puritans. Puritans lived by the Bible and believed if you followed the teachings you were assured a place in heaven. The Puritans in the play have fled England from fear of prosecution. They fear for their lives because they have contradicted the Church of England. The Puritans accused the church of being too extravagant, such as the windows and the decoration being too bright and distracting. They also disapproved of the church being run by the King and not by the people.

        Arthur Miller based the play on real evidence he collected from the transcripts of the Salem witch trials. Therefore he was able to base his main characters, the Proctors, on an actual couple who were tried for witchcraft.

        Two of the plays main themes, which run throughout, are honesty and deceit, and the easily spread mass hysteria.

        We first see the use of deceit in the opening scenes and both of them involve Abigail Williams. This is shown when she is having a passionate word with John Proctor, “I know you, John. I know you.” This seemingly innocent sentence has a hidden meaning, if she knows John Procter she is using the biblical term, which means that she has had an affair with him. This shows her being deceitful due to the fact she has slept with a married man, and hasn’t told anyone about it.

 We also see her lying to others, for example when she is cornered and questioned by Parris regarding the events in the wood she says “not I sir, Tituba and Ruth” this lying is obvious as the audience is well aware that she was involved.

Join now!

        John Procter seems dishonest at the beginning of the play, but this is not continued through the remainder. The audience’s emotion towards him change dramatically when we find out he has told his wife that he has committed adultery. This shows very clearly that he is honest because he wants so save his marriage to Elizabeth, and has sacrificed a great deal by telling her about the affair.

        The wide spread hysteria is shown at many points in the play but the majority is to do with the girls in the village and their ‘performances’ when accusing people of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay