• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Asimov's Science in His Science Fiction

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Asimov's Science in His Science Fiction Isaac Asimov, a twentieth century Russian American, was a very prolific writer. He wrote hundreds of books. He is not only a writer, but he is also a scientist, where many books that comprise his body of work are reference books. The subjects range from Space science and geology, to Shakespeare and the Bible. As a man who graduated High School as a genius at fifteen and also as one who could create different believable worlds in a piece of writing, he has successfully bridged knowledge and creativity. His skill as an organized logical writer and as a pronounced man of sciences and history is reflected not only in his non-fiction, but also in his ability to write science fiction, even if he may be seen as very simplistic and precise in style. Isaac Asimov uses his logic-bound writing style and his knowledge as a scientist to create effective science fiction. Isaac Asimov's scientific approach accommodates his science fiction stories. His knowledge in sciences and his grasp of logic makes his science fiction more believable. As both a writer and a scientist, Asimov uses scientific theories as the basis of his fiction. His stories are thought of as not just works of fiction, but hypotheses for the future of our world, or hypotheses for how other worlds, if they exist, would be like. What makes his propositions go beyond fiction is that he does not just create things from magic or fantasy, but creates worlds with rationality and scientific possibilities or probabilities. ...read more.

Middle

Byerley is never outsmarted and is shown as a man who is in control of any situation because he seems to have all the solutions to all possible outcomes, especially when he is defending himself against attacks on his "humanism". Byerley seems almost too mathematical to be human, so it makes more sense for him to be the advanced robot superior in intellect to the average human. For his human adversaries, on the other hand, Asimov writes on the other extreme. They are imperfect, emotional, and become frustrated easily. They seem to eat their words with every legal and ethical technicality Byerley produces because nothing they can say or produce ever proves Byerley as a genuine robot. What is impressive about this characterization of humans is that their irrationality is not apparent until a more rational character such as Byerley points it out. The reason we, the readers do not catch this unless it is pointed out is because it may be the rational the average human would use. We would be inclined to assume that a man is a robot if we heard the reason of his accusation as a man never eats or sleeps. Byerley, or rather Asimov, explains the irrationality of this assumption that to use, may seem like a rational assumption. "'So-and-so is a robot because he hardly eats with people, and I have never seen him fall asleep in the middle of a case; and once when I peeped into his window in the middle of the ...read more.

Conclusion

This ability makes an effective writer, and Asimov achieves this mystery-like structure because of his science thinking mind. He uses an approach that reminds one of a science experiment log or a mathematical proof where there are pieces of a puzzle to be patched together, solving the mysterious questions of universe that always seem to appear in his science-fiction. His skill as an organized logical writer and as a pronounced man of sciences and history is reflected not only in his non-fiction, but also in his ability to write science fiction, even if he may be seen as very simplistic and precise in style. This is apparent in many of his more developed short stories with his trademarks- the science-bound style and topic, the creation of the characters using his skill in rational thought, and the structure he is able to write in using his ability to logically organize and build a story without weak links. Definitely, Asimov can be called both a scientist conjoined with a writer to create not only effective creative writing, but also to explore further into the depths of science and our human relation to technology. Perhaps one day we will find ourselves implementing the Three Laws of Robotics and credit a man, an author, as a scientist who created not just a fictional future, but a real future through the science behind the fiction. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE H.G. Wells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE H.G. Wells essays

  1. Pre 1914 Prose Fiction - Stories of Mystery

    This method of writing varies greatly to that of H.G.Wells' short story, 'The Sea Raiders', an early science fiction novel detailing the appearance of a group of man eating cephalopods off the coast of England. Unlike Poe, Wells relies on a mixture of objective and subjective vocabulary to turn an entirely fictional story into a seemingly factual account.

  2. PRE-1914 PROSE

    This woman is introduced into the story as a ghostlike figure as found because she is described when Isaac is having a nightmare in the stable. Again like the first story, this story also has a narrator and is in first-person point of view.

  1. Mid-night, a crazy, confused, cranky clever scientist is at work

    Not far from here that hideous beast is lurking in his house doing hell knows what! I'm not asking you to help kill him, I'm demanding you! If your not willing to risk your life for the Safety of this town walk out now, go to your home live in fear because if we die...your NEXT!

  2. The Case of the Stolen Bacillus by H.G.Wells and the Half Pair by Bertrum ...

    We can tell this from the speeches of the cab driver and the bacteriologist. The cab driver is stereotypically portrayed as a lower class Victorian man who has not been educated very well. This is evident when he says, 'That's 'Arry 'Ilks.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Writers use of Science Fiction in The Sound of Thunder ...

    Fothringay to convey his fable. He is described at first to be a man of devilish characteristics "...erect red hair, moustache with ends that he twisted up..." and therefore gives the reader a sense of danger to come. As it turns out Fotheringay is addicted to assertive argument, much like eckels addiction to hunting; through this addiction he uncovers his gift.

  2. What makes a good mystery? Using three of the classical mysteries read in class ...

    and, in most horror stories, zombies jolt to life after a spell of lightning. Finally, the woman is noted as always wearing "one glove on her left hand." This creates a sense of mystery, leading on from her earlier description, and make it seem as if she is something from the supernatural.

  1. War of the Worlds

    Supplementary expansive writing techniques used by H.G. Well's is the use of connectives to start sentences such as using "yet, also, and" to begin sentences instead of using sentences to change points or add a different comment from the previous but instead by using these connectives he expands the sentences therefore justifying his point in greater detail.

  2. Compare 'Visitors' and 'The Stolen Bacillus' - Discuss their similarities and differences and consider ...

    Both the stories have a type of humour to them. What makes 'Visitors' humorous is the leader of the robbers introduction says, "this is a robbery" which seems rather usually and unexpected to be said in such a polite manner, what makes it more humorous is at the end of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work