• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Battle of the sexes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

There are many numerous situations in institutions and industries were, for example, firms may want to set up some common standards or take some measures but disagree over how to go about it. This type of situation is characterized by a common objective but divergent views or ways of how to attain that objective. Battle of the sexes is one of the coordination games, which explain such situations by drawing a parallel between such situations with the predicament faced by a man and woman going on a date but prefer two different places. As mentioned before, it comes under the category of cooperation games, which have got many practical applications in our day-to-day life. In the language of Game Theory, a cooperative game is a game in which the players can make binding commitments. These games allow the players to share the benefits from cooperation by making transfers among themselves, which would leave them better off. Because of the existence of interpersonal framework; players come together and through cooperation achieve the most favorable outcome for all the players. Games, which replicate such situations, are called negotiated games because the outcome is reached through negotiations and deliberations. And the outcome, which is the result of such negotiation, is called negotiated settlement. ...read more.

Middle

Equation of the red line is Y = f (X) = 1-X, Where X is the probability of Man going to the prizefight and Y is the probability of woman going to the ballet. The joint payoff of the players is (X Y) and the feasible pay off region is the convex set enclosed by the lines joining the pay off pairs. The coefficient of X is called the pay off trade-off rate, since it is the rate at which man's pay off is traded-off with the woman's. Another dimension to the game can be added, by including a third option or alternative. This alternative should be relevant and should have an effect of changing the outcome of the game. The other alternative can be a food joint, which both of them like. In that case, they would not opt for either of their prior preferences. After negotiating or talking about each other's preferences and feelings, they may decide to go to their favorite food joint. This new state of affairs can be represented in the matrix given below. Alice Prize Fight Food Joint Ballet P1 F1 B1 Bob Prize Fight P2 1, 0 0,0 -.6, -.5 Food Joint F2 -.2, -.2 .4, .9 0, 0 Ballet B2 -.1, -.4 -.2, -.2 0, 1 Graphically, it can be explained as following.The line from (0, 1) ...read more.

Conclusion

It can be viewed as the mapping of the possible information of each player to a probability distribution over actions or outcomes. Focal points: In real life situations there are numerous equilibria. But out of these only few seem more likely to be feasible. The psychologically compelling Nash equilibria are called focal points. Past experiences and history form the basis of focal points. In Battle of the sexes, the choice of the equilibria, when the game is repeated over a period of time, depends on the on the focal points. Also focal points impart inflexibility to the game. As the number of times the game is repeated, the possibility of the change of Nash Equilibria cannot be ignored, as the payoffs tend to change. Mediation, communication, negotiation and bargaining also have place in Battle of the Sexes. Application of Battle of the Sexes * Setting industry wide standards is a good example of this game. All firms cooperate, Negotiate and set standards in such a way that it all of them get a favorable pay off. Eg: computer disk drives, pipe fittings, etc * Use of common language to formalize a sales agreement between two firms even They prefer different terms. Common language acts to the advantage of both the firms and help them understand the terms of the agreement better. * At the macroeconomics level, on such example is the formulation of the tax policies by The two tax authorities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Enders Game - Summary

    Ender was the median. The government ordered him born so they could have the best of both sides - someone who could (and would) kill when ordered but would not get out of line. Now, the time has come for him to be prepared for battle, to be tested and melded into the fighter they need him to be.

  2. The Battle of Passchendaele (The Third Battle of Ypres)

    The 5th, 7th, 23rd, 41st and 48th divisions were sent to Italy with Plumer in command. For both sides there was now no hope of any decisive result in 1917. Two further attempts by the British and Canadian army dragged the exhausted infantry to the highest points of the Ridge but they were unable to secure it.

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    And that a direct attack on Britain was not considered because Hitler believed that Britain would agree on a peace treaty and if it did not it would soon surrender. Hitler had underestimated the British. Also Taylor says that Hitler mind was set on the invasion of Russia.

  2. The Battle of Britain

    Dowding, Chief of Fighter Command, Keith Park, Commander of the South East region and Leigh- Mallory commander of the region north of London simply outweighed the leadership of Goring and Hitler for Germany. The leadership factor is mentioned in Interpretation 7 an article printed in the Daily Graphic, 1944 when it was clear the allies were going to win.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Training was shortened even further as the battle intensified until new pilots began to arrive for operations having had only hours of training. Such inexperience would show in the air and would also reflect in the numbers of RAF losses.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    The purpose of this speech was mainly propaganda. It was used to boost the morale of the civilians and especially the pilots. The speech was made at a time when Churchill needed to show he was up to the job of leading the British people.

  1. Compare the treatment of the battle of Agincourt by, respectively, Laurence Olivier and Kenneth ...

    Colour is not over-used in this battle scene as it was not a new feature and not very vibrant colours are needed for mud and blood! In the Olivier version fighting is minimized and the general impression is the overwhelming numbers of the French against the elite, more select army of the British.

  2. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    He will also be biased against the Nazis due to the amount of pain and suffering they inflicted on him and his fellow R.A.F. pilots. Interpretation 4.Is about newsreels that were screened at cinemas across the country, they where produced by the British government to inform the public of the Battle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work