• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Book Review: First Day on the Somme

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Book Review: The First Day on the Somme November 20, 2007 On July 1 1916, in one of the largest military operations to ever be executed, the British army entered into the bloodiest battle it has ever known. This was the battle of the Somme, a conflict that is etched into the collective memory of Britain as a tragedy. The first day on the Somme, the focus of this book, saw the loss of nearly 60,000 British troops, the largest loss in a single day in all of British History. Martin Middlebrook investigates, in depth, the events and circumstances that led to such a battle, and such an outcome, with regards to the British involvement. Through close examination of diaries and official records, as well as a wealth of interviews and correspondence with actual soldiers who experienced the battle first hand, Middlebrook takes us from the the evening before the attack to several days after the attack in excruciating detail with the personal narratives of those who were there. He analyzes the actions of all parties connected to the battle, from the infantryman to the general to the politician in London. Before Middlebrook describes the day of July 1, he provides the reader with a mass of background information to help understand why the battle went the way it did. ...read more.

Middle

The destruction of the barbed wire required a very accurate and precise artillery attack, especially when using shrapnel shells, and this was not achieved. On top of that, a large number of shells did not explode. Men reported seeing hundreds of unexploded shells strewn across the battlefield. The second great mistake, from Middlebrook's point of view, was the exclusion of troops to secure German trenches immediately after the shelling stopped. This could stem from Rawlinson's overconfidence in the artillery. If key positions were attacked before the Germans had time to prepare their defenses, British troops could have quickly gained an advantage over the Germans. Middlebrook argues that Rawlinson had little faith in new army soldiers, and that he thought a rushing attack would be to complicated and confusing for them to execute. Instead, it was ordered that the men should adhere to the rigid wave system. Men, loaded with a large amount of equipment, walked in lines across open ground with German machine gunners directly in front of them. Middlebrook says "It was the senselessness of sending up to eight waves of heavily laden men across open ground, without any sort of advance guard, that caused a high portion of the casualties" (280) ...read more.

Conclusion

A feature of the book that I found especially insightful and compelling was the inclusion of the perspective of German military personnel. Throughout the narrative of the text, Middlebrook quotes German soldiers with the same manner he quotes British soldiers. Understandably, the British offering far outweighs the German, but the inclusion at all is refreshing. The reader is shown the fundamental similarities between sides and is given a broader understanding of humanity in war. In the end, the goal of this book is to explore if the first day was a success and if the battle as a whole was worthwhile. Middlebrook looks at Haim's original objectives to determine what might mean. "The French were relieved from defeat at Verdun; the positions held by the Allies at the end of battle were better than on 30 June; Losses were inflicted on the Germans." (289) But, as Middlebrook states "the British assault had been on such a scale that success, in this limited sense, had been inevitable. The terrible losses made it a success hardly worth having" (290) This book provides the reader with a clear view not only of a single battle, but of the elements of the British army in 1916. Most importantly, it gives the reader a glimpse into the mind of the soldiers who fought in that battle and that army. It is a powerful piece of literature that is both enlightening and engaging. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Gunga Din Analysis

    4 star(s)

    The author has definitely conveyed the fear and the terrifying development of weapons and warfare of the time among the regiment. The author has also demonstrated that every person can act as well as the next and that people should not be limited or judged by their skin colour, rank or ethnicity.

  2. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    Haig's first stage of attack would be a seven-day bombardment of the German trenches. This apparently would eliminate all Germans and the British would be able to walk no mans unopposed, in an orderly fashion.

  1. Why is the battle of the Somme regarded as a great military ...

    shelling of the German front line was to cut the barbed wire so that the troops could get to the trenches. The fact that the shells had been so poorly made meant the only thing they did to the barbed wire was make it more tangled up.

  2. Saving Private Ryan Examine Steven Spielberg's use of images and Presentation of war. ...

    This shows us how men turned to god in war putting their lives in his hands this is a religious icon and shows some morality in war. There faces show us straight away that they are all terrified. We hear men vomiting, this shows us how scared the men are

  1. Compare the presentation of war in the Olivier and Branagh versions of 'Henry V'. ...

    The battle is very graphic and gory, showing many individual fights and men being killed very violently. As it starts to rain, the lighting becomes darker making the mood generally more depressing. The battle goes into slow motion and only the sound of the rain and swords clanging are heard with the occasional scream as men die.

  2. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    The Luftwaffe concentrated all their strength on knocking out Fighter Command and made repeated attacks on the airfields. Of the 33 heavy attacks in the next two weeks, 24 were against airfields. The key sector stations were hit repeatedly: Biggin Hill and Hornchurch four times each, Debden and North Weald twice each.

  1. "How far was the Battleof the Somme a "Victory" for the British?"

    Richard Tames can be considered as a historian who gives detailed statistical values: "...July 1916 500 Germans had surrendered to the British army, however on October the British took another 60000 casualties. ... 141 days since the Battle of the Somme had begun British General Headquarters estimated their casualties 415000 and the French lost 195000 casualties in the south."

  2. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    These figures indicate that Germany lost almost double the amount of planes than Britain and this may be the reason why Britain won the Battle of Britain as Germany lost far more planes. Recent research indicates that Hitler's heart was not in an attack on Britain but that he wanted

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work