• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Both authors have to convince the reader that the main character is mad. How do they do this? Which portrayal is more effective? Why? Bradbury and Poe.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Both authors have to convince the reader that the main character is mad. How do they do this? Which portrayal is more effective? Why? Both Bradbury1 and Poe2 work extremely hard to convince the reader that the main character is mad. They achieve this by each using a wide variety of different techniques, and each madness can be seen to bear both similarities and differences. For example, motivation for murder is different in each case. Immediate reactions to the crime itself are also different. However, the short stories culminate in a similarly undesirable ending for both characters. This essay charts how both writers masterfully portray madness in their chosen protagonist. It compares and contrasts the two texts to discover exactly how Poe and Bradbury use words with precision and style to create an unchallengable impression that each character is insane. The first thing that the reader notices at the beginning of The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl is the way the story is told; Bradbury uses third person to describe what is happening. This is different to The Tell Tale Heart, where Poe writes in first person. What are the effects of these different ways of writing? Using first person really invites the reader to get an insight into the protagonist's mind and how he3 operates. Poe uses this to allow the reader to develop a sense of understanding the character and his motivation. This actually draws the reader into the story, so that she may think some of the character's ideas are rational (which they are clearly not), and subsequently begin to wonder about her own sanity. It could be argued that Bradbury's way of telling the story is just as effective as Poe's. This is because the reader of The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl is also let in on the character's thoughts and emotions, so that here too, the reader may empathise with him. ...read more.

Middle

Although each paranoia is slightly different - Poe's protagonist is terrified of a faceless 'danger' while Acton fears that Huxley has 'set him up' for the murder by Huxley by encouraging him to leave his fingerprints all over the house. This paranoia of Acton's is developed by replaying conversations that he had with his victim. It is probable, though not certain, that Acton exaggerates many of the things that Huxley said. For instance; "Feel this binding. Feel of it." Acton emphasises the word 'feel', which Huxley would not have done when he said it. By believing his theory that Huxley had planned his own murder in order to get Acton put into prison (totally implausible) he manages to relieve himself of some of the tremendous feeling of guilt which is bearing down on him. In fact everything that Acton does throughout the story is an attempt to 'undo' what he has done, or at least to try to forget or detach himself from his victim. He is constantly trying to escape - most importantly from his conscience, but also from the police. An interesting idea is when Huxley's drunken friend knocks on the door - "I know you're in there, Huxley! Open up, dammit! This is Billy-Boy, drunk as an owl, drunker than two owls." It may be that what is said has little meaning, and that the words Bradbury used are just typical of what someone might say when they have had too much to drink. However, surely it is a possibility at least that the 'owl' that the drunk likens himself to is a metaphor for what Acton is afraid of? Owls are well known for their silent flight, and perhaps this suggests that Acton is very worried that something - the police or his conscience - will swoop in and catch him out without warning. Is it also an idea that the owl is what he is trying to be - as "quiet" as possible so that he doesn't let anyone know that it was him who killed Huxley? ...read more.

Conclusion

1 Author of The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl 2 Who wrote The Tell Tale Heart 3There is no unequivocal evidence in The Tell Tale Heart that the main character is male - it is only implied on page 93 when the character counter-claims suggestions that he is a "madman", and that; "You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing." Most readers probably assume that he is a man because of the crime he commits, which requires a certain amount of strength. Besides this, the tone of the text and the choice of vocabulary build up the idea that the protagonist has a masculine identity. It is also worth thinking about the text in context - Poe wrote The Tell Tale Heart in 1843, and at that time few women would have received an education, especially those from families with little or no money. The impression I get is that the protagonist is possibly a servant of the old man, and if this is the case it is even less likely that a person with such low status and wealth would have such an excellent command of English and extended vocabulary as is displayed by our murderer if she was a woman. 4 We are not given any real proof that Huxley has been having the affair with Lily (his wife), only that Huxley tells him, "She says she'll go with me to Mexico City" and when Acton asks where Lily is, Huxley replies, Do you think I'd tell you, really?" These are not the words of a man who is trying desperately to protest his innocence, so right from the beginning, the idea that Huxley is not a very decent person has been established in the reader's mind. But it really doesn't matter whether Huxley did have an affair with Lily or not; it is Huxley's personality which Bradbury describes and makes suggestions about in the text which show us why Acton killed him. 5 As The Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl was in 1963, adapted by Ilona Ference which featured Leonard Rossiter as William Acton ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Edgar Allan Poe section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Edgar Allan Poe essays

  1. How effectively do Poe and Bradbury use narrative voice, narrative structure and language to ...

    Bradbury can, however, use the omniscience of his narrator to explore the nature of Acton's madness using the element of time. Because Bradbury's narrator can skip backwards and forwards in time, he is able to emphasise Acton's erratic insanity. Poe is constrained by the necessity of telling the story the

  2. Choose two of the pre-20th century short stories that you have studied. Compare and ...

    With the appearance of the police, the narrator, who in the beginning attempts to prove his fake innocence, cannot tolerate the guilt any longer and eventually confesses to his "perfect" crime. "Villains! [...] I admit the deed! -- Tear up the planks!"

  1. By comparing‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ with ‘Hop Frog’ discuss the ways in which the writersportray ...

    In contrast to the wallpaper, the garden represents the narrator's hope of freedom. The garden is described as 'delicious' and where everything in the wallpaper is bad and infectious, everything in the garden is good and healing. However the narrator is locked away with her illness and is unable to

  2. How Doyle and Poe represent crime in their stories

    It also illustrates the fact that the criminal wasn't targeting the old man for anything between them, or for his money and fortunes, which shows that the killer's thoughts and actions are clearly supernatural and were deliberately performed. This portraits the fact that the criminal is undoubtedly insane about getting rid of the old man's eye.

  1. How does Poe create a picture of the psychotic/insane central character?

    Furthermore, Poe uses long sentences for explaining things like when the narrator tells you about his preparations to kill the man but Poe creates short sentences for the exciting parts of the story, for example: "It was the beating of the old man's heart".

  2. Explore the techniques used by pre-twentieth century authors to build fear and tension for ...

    This arouses suspicion in the reader, as we do not know what to think. Edgar Allan Poe continually tries to befriend the reader, yet he is horrific. We start to feel sympathetic towards him, and pathos is created. The man continued to present the reader with explanations and excuses for his "evil deed."

  1. Within 'The tell-tale heart' the author has to convince the reader that the main ...

    The man eventually gives in and confesses due to the constant noise of a heart beat coming from the dead body. As soon he hears the clocklike sound of the heart beat he starts getting on edge and uneasy, sounding even more crazy as time goes by.

  2. The truly mad man is someone that does not recognise his madness. Analyse the ...

    When the narrator speaks of the eye his speech begins to break up and get very jumpy " I think it was his eye! yes, it was this!" ; similar to the way he speaks at the beginning. The exclamation marks suggest a high pitched voice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work