• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain isnt tough when considering whether to let asylum seekers stay here- far too many get in. In this essay I am going to answer the statement shown above and show both sides of the argument

Extracts from this document...


"Britain isn't tough when considering whether to let asylum seekers stay here- far too many get in." In this essay I am going to answer the statement shown above and show both sides of the argument. An asylum seeker is someone who leaves his/her country and goes out to look for a safe place to live. A refugee on the other hand, is a person who runs away from his/her country because he/she is afraid of something. Why do they exactly leave? Refugees and asylum seekers may leave their countries because there might be war, fear of their safety, protection and persecution- discrimination of race, gender, religion or political opinion. There is no particular place as to where asylum seekers come from, however in 2002, the top five countries are said to have been, Iraq (14,940), Zimbabwe (7,695), Afghanistan (7,380), Somalia (6,680) and China (3, 735). Those figures are always changing due to adjustments in economical and political complications. Asylum seekers may leave their own country for a variety reasons, for example, they may be experiencing war, their human rights are not being respected and there are several other reasons. Some countries are so harsh such that some people can be arrested, sent to prison or occasionally tortured just because of their religious/ political beliefs. If the situation in a country changes for the better, then as a result, there are often less asylum seekers form that country. The number of people applying for asylum in the UK has been rapidly decreasing over the recent years. ...read more.


A law abiding citizen is someone who always follows the law and never breaks it. If asylum seekers were to break the law or commit a crime etc, they would be put in detention and most likely deported. This is the main reason why asylum seekers are classed as law- abiding because if they did anything wrong they would be scared of being deported. This shows that there is no reason as to why asylum seekers shouldn't be allowed to stay in the UK because most of them would do the right things. Another reason is that they make a huge contribution to the British economy and culture. Some of them are highly educated and therefore have good jobs- doctor, dentist, engineer etc and those that aren't well educated, start their own businesses where a lot of money is earned. About 1,200 medically qualified refugees/ asylum seekers are recorded on the British Medical Associations database. Those who come to the UK well educated would have done a lot of hard work in their country. Asylum seekers are people who are just looking for a safe place to stay but many people look at them in the wrong way. Just because they may have had to flee from another country to the UK, doesn't at all mean they carry deadly diseases or are people who looking for trouble which mean they shouldn't be allowed to stay in the UK. This isn't a good way for people to look at asylum seekers in and I personally find it unfair and disrespectful. ...read more.


This wouldn't be good at all, but would probably have an influence on youngsters- they may see it as a cool/ grown up thing to do and start doing it themselves. This might increase the amount of crimes in our communities. Nevertheless, not all asylum seekers are like this! The reasons I've shown above, all go to show and prove that asylum seekers shouldn't be allowed to stay in the UK- most of them cause chaos, trouble and stress. No one should have to suffer their problems and so the easiest way to prevent this, is to simply not allow asylum seekers to stay in the UK. Overall, I personally come to conclude that asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in the UK. I've looked into both sides of the argument and find that not allowing them to stay in the UK is just horrible. Asylum seekers are just the same as anyone else and therefore should be allowed to stay wherever they want, without being forced away or badly judged by others. I think by not allowing them asylum seekers to stay in the UK is totally disrespecting their human rights because there isn't a specific place where only asylum seekers should stay- they should be able to stay wherever they can get help. If asylum seekers stay in the UK, it allows them and others to mix with a range of other people from different groups. I think some people should start to appreciate the fact that we are all different and therefore come from different backgrounds which should be respected. If everyone had the same background, our world would be very boring. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Writing to Argue, Persuade and Advise essays

  1. Arguementative Essay

    This leads people to believe that the British National Party is a threat to the stability of the country and we risk another holocaust if they come into power. Do you believe that people with this sort of attitude towards the holocaust should be authorised to make an effort to rule the country in which we live in?

  2. GCSE essay "Pride and Prejudce"

    Once married, the couple's relationship is amusing. Charlotte encourages her husband to be engaged with as many activities as possible, 'at work in the garden ...reading and writing and looking out the widow,' so she can be left alone in the drawing room.

  1. Letter to Editor on Refugees. This editorial presented a point of view concerning ...

    The Australian society, culture and the economy had always been benefited from the immigration of people from all around the world. Immigration must be non-discriminatory and not based on nationality, origin, religion, language, gender, disability, sexuality, age or social backgrounds.

  2. Horoscopes: Fact, fiction or fun? Horoscopes are a part of our life, its ...

    They are also a smart people, likes to work in more than one job. Love to break rules and hate routine. Travelling and unknown things attract them their best friend is their other half "because he is a twin". (7)

  1. War Photography

    But from Duffy's way of thinking, the photographer is going through emotional agony trying to forget what his lens has captured. He has to deal with the guilt of not being able to offer help to those who he has desperately harassed and published their miserable lives in a cheap paper.

  2. invasion of iraq in 2003

    of power because at the beginning of the story Ivan Dmitrich did not believe in playing lottery , it was his wife's idea in the first place and so therefore he feels threatened because he believes his wife Masha deserves the right to make the decisions about how to spend the money.

  1. Response Essay on Gandhiji

    It is the application of the principle that matters and not the principle. Ultimately Gandhi Ji's aim of getting rid of the British was fulfilled as he did get them to leave India. This is the proof of what his beliefs are. Here the application for his principles are justified.

  2. Arguing in support of refugees in Australia

    and still face the harshest consequences of powerlessness where they are not only forced to ?place (your) their fate in the hands of other people? but also out of reach with the people that make them feel power, their family and friends.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work