Browning cleverly uses the narrative device of a dramatic monologue to portray his version of an Arthurian legend.

Authors Avatar

Browning cleverly uses the narrative device of a dramatic monologue to portray his version of an Arthurian legend. This form of writing can be extremely useful, as it is able to engage the reader through its continuous effect. Browning skilfully probes the nature of the character so that he reveals things about himself that he did not intend to disclose. In this way, this method reveals secrets, feelings and thoughts that would otherwise remain hidden. The reader is ‘listening’ to the tale and takes a role unlike the therapist; interpreting what is really being said. There is a certain pleasure in being able to see and understand this secret world that Browning himself cannot see. The poem seems to contain a more psychological approach; hence drawing the reader in. ‘Roland’ is somewhat more human, rather than the heroic knight. This is seen through the confusion and doubt in his mind, which has been demonstrated by the use of question marks and exclamation marks. These thought processes are merely tools to emphasise on this dramatic monologue. The middle section gradually builds tension and suspense. No doubt horror and disgust is felt at the thought of stamping on a ‘dead man’s cheek’.

        Browning also tends to use colloquial language from time to time. He uses it to discuss his fate, as ‘then the trap shuts’, sealing his fate, implying that he has an intimacy with his own fate.

        Roland imagines that he sees other knights. The landscape is personified as a malicious character. The idea of a “ragged thistle-stalk” adds to the feelings of unease and horror.

Browning also uses metaphors and similes. These simple and common devices just add to the illustration of the Arthurian legend. The comparison of a ‘distorted mouth that splits its rim gaping at death’ to nature is ironic. Nature is the most benevolent. It is a symbol of peace and beauty. What you see is what you get. To compare it to death is disturbing and furthermore worrying.

Browning may have used the form of a dramatic monologue to portray the idea of Arthurian legends. However, Tennyson chooses to tell his tale through a dialogue. This form allows the reader to have a feel of the whole situation by maintaining an overall insight of the poem. The action mainly takes place between two characters, King Arthur and Bedivere. The poem builds suspense, with mention of ‘Merlin’ and the ‘brand Excalibur’. Suspicious results over Bedivere are the consequence of his actions. He attempts to conceal the truth from King Arthur, as he does not want ‘a precious thing’ to be lost forever from the Earth. This form of writing gives the reader an advantage. At one point or another of the poem, the reader is involved with what happens while the other character (mostly King Arthur) is left in the dark. Though, Tennyson never actually approaches the reader in the poem, it makes the reader feel almost special. The thought of knowing something that another doesn’t seems satisfying. It makes you feel part of the tale as you soon await the resection of the other character once the truth is revealed. As the readers, we are required to change roles as each person talks.

Join now!

In one section of the poem, Bedivere has a sly dialogue with himself. This allows the reader to learn more about the character and his thoughts in the current situation.

Tennyson also makes it regular to use the method of repetition. He displays increasingly ritualistic forms of repetition. Due to this style of writing, it makes the poem more enjoyable to read. It also allows the reader to always look back and remember past events of the poem because it is quite long.

        The settings and atmosphere of both poems are taken very seriously. They set the scene for the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay