By a careful comparative analysis of the ways in which women are presented in The Sons Veto, Tony Kytes - Arch Deceiver, and On the Western Front, written in the nineteenth century, examine the role of women in society.

Authors Avatar

By a careful comparative analysis of the ways in which women are presented in the following three stories, written in the nineteenth century, examine the role of women in society. In so doing, comment on the ways in which the values and attitudes depicted in theses stories have contributed to their situation.

        Women’s role in society now, is very different to how it used to be, mainly due to the suffrage movement. In the nineteenth century women couldn’t vote, were not considered equal to men, and also couldn’t even earn a living. Most of the time men would look down at women as they were seen as the inferior gender and often were patronizing, the first example of this is in ‘The Son’s Veto’ where the female (Sophy) is being corrected by her own son! ‘Has, dear mother-not have!’ Her son is a public school boy; does this make him think he is better than others and superior? He is certainly frustrated with his mother’s apparent stupidity. Sophy has not got Standard English dialect, most probably from a bad upbringing, so in her son’s eyes she embarrasses him, although she knows herself she does not fit.

        The lack of education is problematic in marriage as if either partner does not have the same education and background they’re most unlikely to be unhappy in marriage.

        

It is apparent to us that Sophy does not love her husband, the Vicar and married him out of respect-‘Sophy did not exactly love him, but she had a respect for him which almost amounted to veneration’ We must remember that in the nineteenth century, for a women securing a husband was the same as securing a future, so many women did not marry out of love. This is similar in ‘Tony Kytes-the Arch Deceiver’ although all three women in this story have been treated badly all three are willing to marry even if they state that they are not-‘She walked upon her father’s arm, thinking and hoping he would ask her again.’ And ‘She would not have refused Tony if he had asked her quietly’–when Tony asks for Hannah’s hand in marriage she refuses although does not want to-‘I do refuse him! Partly because her father was there and partly, too, in a tantrum because of the discovery, and the scratch that might be left on her face.’ When Tony tries again he is refused for the second time and again the women is uncertain of her refusal-‘though she looked back when she’d gone some way’ and when he finally tries for the last time he is not refused and so marries Milly who is seen as the safe option from the start but also we must remember he had chosen her in the first place.

Join now!

‘On the Western Circuit’ also displays characters that do not marry out of love; Charles only reason for marrying Anna is because he slept with her and she became pregnant, he thought he loved her but only fell in love with Mrs Harnham, through the letters she was writing for Anna and he realises when he next sees Anna that she is illiterate, in absolute horror. Mrs Harnham enjoys writing to Charles-‘The luxury of writing to what would be known to no consciousness but his was great, and she had indulged herself therein’ and later we discover that Mrs Harnham has ...

This is a preview of the whole essay