By Analysing Chapter 2 consider the presentation of the friendship that exists with Stephen and Keith

Authors Avatar

Sophie Tataryn                                                                                                       MCM

By Analysing Chapter 2 consider the presentation of the friendship that exists with Stephen and Keith

   In the first chapter of Michael Frayn’s novel ‘Spies’, amongst the limited amount of characters introduced, is Keith. The reader is given no background knowledge about him, only that “Does he ever think about the things that happened that summer?” meaning that Keith is a significant person as it is implied that he shared the narrator’s (revealed as Stephen in chapter 2) experience that particular, somewhat haunting summer. However in Chapter 2 a lot more information is given about Keith and details about the depth of friendship between Keith and Stephen begin to emerge.

   In Chapter 2, one of the first memories Stephen comes to is that of his house.

“…in spite of the fact that it’s attached to No.3- the only semidetached pair in the Close,” indicating that Stephen is somewhat the odd one out, when he says ‘only,’ and almost uncomfortable about admitting to this. He then goes on to describe his ghastly neighbours who were ‘even more shameful’ than his house, and how they ‘brought us down with them.,’ and he then goes on to expresses his distress about being attached to the ‘undesirables’.  Also that he was still somewhat ‘faintly embarrassed about it’ despite all the years that had past. Throughout this chapter, Stephen implies to the reader how his house was neglected, and ‘never tended’ to, and this could easily link to his and his parents’ relationship with each other. Next, Stephen then describes how he ‘doesn’t need to open the front gate because it’s already, rotted drunkenly away from the top hinge,’ as he makes his way to Keith’s house, however, once arriving there, he goes through the ‘White wicket gate on its well oiled hinges and closes it carefully behind him’. The keywords here are ‘white’ suggesting purity (unlike the rot on Stephen’s gate), and ‘carefully’ as Stephen obviously feels he should treat Keith’s gate with respect, even if he has no regard for his own, as it has been so well maintained.  Immediately the gates highlight the contrast between Keith and Stephen, however the contrast then grows as the reader is introduced to Keith’s house, which is perceived as ‘neat’, ‘flawless’ and ‘perfection’ by Stephen. This is because Keith’s house is exactly the opposite of Stephen’s, and the unlikely forming of friendship of these two boys is defiantly presented with the differences of lifestyle and houses.

Join now!

   Another key point used in the presentation of friendship between Stephen and Keith is the boys’ appearance. Stephen is described as ‘grubby’, with one of his ‘grey socks’ slipping down his leg into a thick concertina. The narrator (older Stephen) asks the rhetorical question ‘What do I feel about him as I watch him now?’, and then goes on to answer this himself claiming his appearance to be ‘unsatisfactory’. Keith is then bought into the story, and his appearance, like the houses, is the exact opposite of Stephen; ‘His shirt, though, not to short, his shorts are not to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay