• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

By close study of "Valentine" and "I Wouldn't Thank You for a Valentine" shows how Carol Ann Duffy and Liz Lockhead express their views on love.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

By close study of "Valentine" and "I Wouldn't Thank You for a Valentine" shows how Carol Ann Duffy and Liz Lockhead express their views on love. Although Carol Ann Duffy and Liz Lockhead are both writing on their views and experiences to do with Valentine's Day and love in general, the tone varies greatly between the two. Liz Lockhead's "I Wouldn't Thank You for a Valentine" is satirising the idea of Valentine's Day, but still believes in love and her feeling about it are sincere. In contrast Carol Ann Duffy's "Valentine" is really just using Valentine's Day as a way of mocking the entire idea of love. Her poem comes across as being more aggressive, and uses a conceit, in the form of an onion, to mock the metaphysicals. In Carol Ann Duffy's "Valentine", a poem about Duffy and her views on Valentine's Day and love in general, the tone is really quite aggressive. One of the ways she expresses this is through the way that the poem is structured and by some of the language she uses. For example she starts off the poem by saying "Not a red rose or satin heart" in a one line stanza, which paints a very blunt, harsh, negative picture. ...read more.

Middle

Although both poets are Scottish it is only Lockhead's accent that is obvious. She uses Scottish dialect such as "swither" and "canny be bothered" throughout her poem, which suggest to the reader that she isn't taking it very seriously, but is proud of her heritage and is willing to show it. The first line in Lockhead's poem is "I wouldn't thank you for a valentine", which is very similar to Duffy's poem, "I give you an onion", in that it starts off with a blunt, negative statement. However Lockhead's is an ordinary sentence that wouldn't be considered unusual, unlike Duffy's, which would be considered to be very unusual indeed, and thus makes Duffy's more memorable. Whereas Duffy is against the whole idea of love, Lockhead supports the idea of love but is against the commercialism of Valentine's Day and the clich�s associated with it. She sums this up in one sentence, "The whole Valentine's Day Thing is trivial and commercial", and Lockhead goes on to say that it is "A cue for unleashing clich�s and candyheart motifs to which I personally am not partial". The way that Lockhead uses capital letters for the words "Day" and "Thing" as well as for Valentine suggests that that it has become an event because of the commercialism associated with it and for no worthy reason. ...read more.

Conclusion

Unlike Lockhead's poem, "Valentine" uses plenty of metaphors. For instance "it will make your reflection a wobbling photo of grief", proposes that you would be depressed and crying continually, and because she uses the word "photo" suggests that the effects of this would be permanent. To paint a very vivid image of her feelings, she uses similes such as "It will blind you with tears like a lover" and "It promises light like the careful undressing of love." These tell you that love was meant to be good, but always ends up breaking your heart in the end. The way Duffy says "undressing of love" also suggests possible dishonesty. Together these poetic devices portray a depressing image that is only enhanced as the poem continues. It clear to see that both poems have been strongly influenced by the writer's feminist beliefs and both have similar points of view on Valentine's Day. However, I prefer "I Wouldn't Thank You for a Valentine" by Liz Lockhead because of the original way in which the poem is structured and the humorous tone and general light heartedness depicted throughout her poem, which make for an easier and more enjoyable read, but Duffy's more serious approach and very vivid imagery portrayed in "Valentine", while still interesting, does not quite flow as well and therefore is not quite as enthralling a read. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Carol Ann Duffy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Carol Ann Duffy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How has Duffy used classical myths in order to comment on the nature of ...

    5 star(s)

    Furthermore the use of the placing the word 'whistling' on its own on one line, implies the carefree tie in which the man felt at one with his surroundings, master of the house, accompanied by his dog, with his wife close at hand.

  2. Compare and contrast Carol Ann Duffys treatment of love and language in the poems ...

    The second stanza starts with "Falling in love". The line starts two line breaks down from where the sentence would start if it was part of stanza two. This positioning reflects the content - the text has fallen, just as she has fallen in love. "Glamorous hell" is an oxymoron - there is no way hell can be glamorous.

  1. An evaluation of TWO poems on the theme of 'outsider'- 'Education for leisure' by ...

    This indicates that respect and concentration was still present in the hospital. '...cage...' this word shows that the woman is lost in her own world and is not aware of what is going on outside. She is sitting there but she is an 'outsider' in her own mind.

  2. Mrs Beast - Carol Ann Duffy

    - look, love, I should know," In the second stanza Mrs Beast approaches the House of the Beast, she seems sure of herself - or wants to give that impression - she is independent, knows her own mind and is prepared to leave at the hint of any negative attitude from the Beast.

  1. Compare 3 poems by Carol Ann Duffy in which she shows us that things ...

    She banishes the orthodox ideas as untruthful and unrealistic. Duffy gives us all of the things that we do not expect from a love poem. Assumptions are wrong. Expectations, conventions are broken, even shattered by what we read in the poem. Duffy links the qualities of an onion to those of love.

  2. Explain how Carol Ann Duffy conveys her feelings towards the subjects of the two ...

    The 'ordered rows' also reminds me of rows of body bags, full of the victims of war. The tone of this poem makes me assume that she is praising the war photographer and sympathising with those suffering through war, particularly women and children.

  1. Mrs Midas - Carol Ann Duffy

    I believe these statements have both obvious and conflicting hidden meanings. The Field of the Cloth of Gold refers to the meeting ground of King Henry VIII and King Francis I, Where both kings attempted to outshine each other with lavish golden tents and clothing etc.

  2. Carol Ann Duffy - Childhood and Youth

    This transition is also shown in the physical form of a young child to adolescence. Duffy portrays primary school as a "safe" haven and when the child becomes more aware of their surroundings they begin to take that metaphorical journey to knowledge however the teacher, or in the case of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work